CLASSIFYING RISK–WHY PROPER RISK CLASSIFICATION IS IMPORTANT
(October 2013)
A competent physician
never treats a new patient based solely on the contents of the previous
physician’s patient files. He requires a new examination. Similarly, a competent
insurance agent should never accept the classifications on a new customer’s
prior policy without independently evaluating that customer’s exposures.
The agent should examine
the prior policy, much as a physician refers to the information in the previous
physician's file. However, the agent should consider three reasons that
classifications may have to be changed.
- The information concerning who last classified the
risk and the criterion used is usually not readily available. The previous
producer or the party responsible for classifying the risk may have been
extremely knowledgeable and proficient. However, that person may have had
a bad day, and made poor decisions. That person may have relied on even
older information that another previous producer developed. It is also
possible that the party who prepared the information may not have had any
idea what he or she was doing and just threw something together that
looked right. A new agent should never blindly duplicate the efforts and
thought processes of a previous producer without thoroughly evaluating and
analyzing the risk.
- Most successful commercial operations respond to
changes in their marketplace or environment. When market or economic
conditions are difficult, and normal product lines do not perform as they
should or did when times were better, the successful enterprise may decide
to develop, manufacture, and market additional
product lines as a hedge against the difficult market conditions. On the
other hand, another enterprise might specialize in a particular product
during economic boom times and diversify if needed during economic
downturns in order to enhance and increase its cash flow and to utilize
excess manufacturing or storage capacity.
- ISO regularly changes classifications but the changes
may not be predictable or even logical. An applicant may have been
accurately classified in the past and even up to the present time.
However, a new classification approach renders the old classification
obsolete and it may require using completely new classifications. The new
approach may even require that an old classification be split into two or
more classifications or that previously separate classifications be combined into one entirely new classification.
The insurance agent is
the customer's representative to the insurance company. As such, he or she is
responsible for providing appropriate and accurate classifications that should
be based on the risk’s current business operations.
Accurate classification
information allows the insurance company to develop the proper premium for the
specific risk. Not doing so can lead to serious pricing errors that can also
affect the risk’s desirability and acceptability from the underwriting
standpoint. This problem almost always tends to compound itself. If the initial
classification and rating is wrong, subsequent attempts to correct the errors
usually result in the error getting worse instead of better.
If an incorrectly
classified risk is sold based on a lower premium, the error will eventually be revealed,
corrections made, and the client disappointed by the unpleasant surprise due to
the correction. In many cases, the agent loses the customer and the cycle
begins all over again.
In addition, the
insurance company’s relationship with a specific agent can become strained when
it discovers a pattern of misclassification errors from that agent. This can
lead to remedial actions, such as removing binding and pricing authority from
that agent, as well as other restrictions.
CLASSIFYING RISK–HABITATIONAL PROPERTIES
(October 2013)
INTRODUCTION
Everyone lives in a habitational property. Personal lines coverage forms and
policies insure a habitational property occupied by
the same person who owns it. However, commercial lines coverage forms and
policies insure such properties that a business or person owns that others
occupy.
CLASSIFICATIONS
Assigning residential
classifications is subject to Commercial General Liability Rule 31. It states
that the proper classification is the one that best describes either the
occupancy or the ownership of the particular premises.
The Insurance Services
Office (ISO) developed these classifications to recognize the many different
types of commercial habitational exposures:
- Class Code 60010: Apartment Buildings (NOC)
- Class Code
60011: Apartment Buildings–Garden
- Class Code
60012: Apartment Buildings or Hotels–Time Sharing–Less Than Four Stories
- Class Code
60013: Apartment Buildings or Hotels–Time Sharing–Four Stories or More
- Class Code
60015: Apartment Hotels–Less Than Four Stories
- Class Code
60016: Apartment Hotels–Four Stories or More
- Class Code
61000: Boarding or Rooming Houses
- Class Code
63010: Dwellings–One-Family (Lessor's Risk Only)
- Class Code
63011: Dwellings–Two-Family (Lessor's Risk Only)
- Class Code
63012: Dwellings–Three-Family (Lessor's Risk Only)
- Class Code
63013: Dwellings–Four-Family (Lessor's Risk Only)
- Class Code
64500: Housing Projects–Federal, State, Local
HOUSING PROJECTS
Class Code 64500: Housing Projects–Federal, State, Local is the
most inclusive category. This classification is used if a federal, state, or
local governmental unit or entity owns or manages the premises, regardless of the
type of residential occupancy. This applies even if the particular building fits
within one or more of the other habitational
classifications. This classification is used exclusively in cases where a
federal, state, or local governmental unit owns and manages the housing project
being considered.
GARDEN APARTMENTS
The notes for Class Code 60011: Apartment
Buildings–Garden in the General Liability Classification Tables explain when to use this code. All buildings must be two
stories or less. In addition, all building must be subject to the same
management and access to the same community facilities. The buildings may contain
single or multiple units.
Example:
Marcy Village consists
of fourteen cottages. Five of the cottages are two-family dwelling units and
the rest are single family dwellings.
Scenario 1: Marcy Village, LLC owns all fourteen units. It
maintains the premises, including the common sidewalks and landscaping. Marcy
Village is rated as a garden apartment.
Scenario 2: The single family dwellings are each owned by
different owners and rented out. Marcy Village, LLC owns the two-family
dwellings. Marcy Village manages the entire Village, including the common
sidewalks and landscaping. Marcy Village is rated as a garden apartment.
Scenario 3: The ownership is the same as in scenario 2 but the
owner of each dwelling maintains its own premises and there is no common
landscaping or maintenance. This is not a garden apartment and each property
must be considered separately.
|
Another classification
must be considered if the risk does not meet all of the criteria.
APARTMENT HOTELS
There is a distinction
between apartment buildings and apartment hotels. Simply stated, apartment
hotels rent some or all of its habitational units on
a daily basis. If the number of units so rented is not more than 15% of all
units in the building, one of the apartment building class codes is used. If
the number of units so rented exceeds this percentage, the risk is classified
as an apartment hotel.
BOARDING OR ROOMING HOUSES
There are no footnotes
that explain when Class Code 61000:
Boarding or Rooming Houses is used instead of apartments or apartment
hotels. This means that the ISO PAAS manual must be examined to review the
operations this code contemplates. The main difference is bathrooms. Boarding
houses have shared facilities. Apartment hotels units have private facilities.
DWELLINGS
Dwellings that the named
insured owns and rents to others are rated using one of the dwelling codes
above. However, this is only if they do not meet the criteria established in
the Garden Apartments classification. It is important to note that, according
to the footnotes, a dwelling may be an apartment or dwelling that a corporation
owns and provides to employees or others for use without a lease and without
payment. It also includes time-share apartments that corporations own that are used
exclusively by their employees and executives.
NOT OTHERWISE CLASSIFIED
Class Code 60010: Apartment Buildings (NOC) can be used if all of
the listed habitational classes have been reviewed
and a particular risk does not fit into a class based on the footnotes and operations
that PAAS contemplates. The not otherwise classified class codes are not used
until all other selections have been considered and rejected.
SUMMARY
What seems to be a
dwelling might actually be a garden apartment and what appears to be an
apartment building could actually be an apartment hotel. The only way to be
certain is to know your insured, the way it does business, and pay close
attention to the classifications and notes in the General Liability
Classification Tables.