Scott, a security guard, was injured when the driver of a truck he was inspecting unexpectedly closed the truck's roll down door. Scott's back and neck were injured so he sued the employer of the truck driver. The employer's CGL carrier refused to cover the loss because of the automobile exclusion. Scott argued that the automobile exclusion would not apply because, at the time of the loss, the truck was not being operated as a truck.
Click here to see how the courts interpreted the argument that a truck was not a truck.