Volume 160

APRIL 2020

Return to main screen

COURT CASE:

Unsolicited Texts Not Covered By Cyber Endorsement

McAdoo Cosmetic Surgery (McAdoo) obtained a list of customers of a spa, without consent, that contained personally identifiable information (PII). McAdoo used that information to send text advertisements. David Bochenek (Bochenek) filed suit asserting that McAdoo had violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) and Consumer Fraud Act of 1986 (CFA) by sending him the unsolicited texts. McAdoo notified its insurance provider, Doctors Direct Insurance (Doctors Direct).

McAdoo had medical professional liability insurance coverage with Doctors Direct Insurance that included a cyber claims endorsement. Doctors Direct filed for summary judgment arguing that there was no duty to defend and indemnify because the allegations did not fall within the definitions of the endorsement and specifically the “privacy wrongful act” definition.

The policy read, in part, that it provided coverage:

“To reimburse protected parties, up to the applicable limit indicated in this endorsement, for costs protected parties become legally obligated to pay as a result of a Cyber Claim for any Network Security Wrongful Act or Privacy Wrongful Act. . .”

Cyber was defined as:

“a demand for money or services as compensation, such as a claim letter, notice of attorney’s lien, or a civil suit, administrative proceeding, arbitration or mediation seeking to compel such compensation in which protected parties must participate."

The endorsement defined a “privacy wrongful act” as:

“any breach or violation of U.S. federal, state, or local statutes and regulations associated with the control and use of personally identifiable financial, credit or medical information, whether actual or alleged, but only if committed or allegedly committed by protected parties.”

The court agreed with Doctors Direct and granted it summary judgment. McAdoo appealed.

The higher court noted that the complaint was not associated with the control and use of personally identifiable financial, credit or medical information and affirmed the trial court’s decision.

 

Doctors Direct Ins., Inc. v. Bochenek, 2015 IL App (1st) 142919, 38 N.E.3d 116