It was just a small misunderstanding! |
Jim was a small contractor needing a small workers compensation policy. Jim's insurance agent, Christopher, provided exactly what he needed. The estimated policy premium was $850. The policy was issued, Jim paid the premium and the matter was resolved. The agent-client relationship continued without any apparent concern when the policy renewed for the same premium as the first year. Jim then received the first of two shocks. Cincinnati Insurance Company billed him for $12,503 in additional premium as a result of the premium audit it performed on his business. After the second policy term, Cincinnati's premium audit resulted in an additional premium charge of $10,747. Cincinnati Insurance and Jim failed to reach an agreement, Jim refused to pay and Cincinnati sued to collect the $23,250 total premium due. Jim turned around and sued Christopher, requesting he pay $22,500 because he neglected to properly explain the potential increase in premium.
Christopher argued that he had performed his job faithfully by obtaining the policy as requested and that Jim simply neglected to read it. He stated that he informed Jim that there would be a premium audit but admitted that he did not mention the possibility of an additional premium as a result of it.
The trial court ruled in Christopher’s favor but the appellate court overturned that decision in favor of Jim. Its opinion was that, even if Jim had read the policy, he would not have expected an additional premium equal to nearly 15 times the original charge.
Click here for more details on this court case. |