COMMERCIAL CRIME COVERAGE ANALYSIS
(August 2009)
INTRODUCTION
This analysis is based on the Insurance Services Office
(ISO) 05 06 edition. Changes from the previous edition are in bold print.
Commercial crime coverage
can be written on either a discovery form or a loss sustained form. It may be
written as a monoline policy or as a coverage part in a commercial package
policy. The forms are:
- CR 00 20–Commercial Crime Coverage Form (Discovery
Form)
- CR 00 21–Commercial Crime Coverage Form (Loss
Sustained Form)
- CR 00 22–Commercial Crime Policy (Discovery Form)
- CR 00 23–Commercial Crime Policy (Loss Sustained
Form)
This analysis evaluates
Form CR 00 21, Commercial Crime Coverage Form (Loss Sustained Form).
Like all ISO forms,
defined words are offset by quotation marks in the policy or coverage form but
are not in this analysis. The words you and your mean the named insured listed
on the declarations. As discussed in the Common Policy conditions, the first
named insured is the entity that receives premium statements, cancellations and
similar notices. The words we and us refer to the insurance company providing
the coverage.
Eight separate insuring
agreements are available in each of the commercial crime coverage forms. If any
insuring agreement has NOT COVERED indicated next to it on the declarations,
the policy does not cover or provide protection for that insuring agreement. Therefore,
it is possible to issue a policy where only a single crime insuring agreement
applies.
Coverage applies to losses sustained by the named insured under the
following circumstances:
- The loss must
be the result of an occurrence.
- The occurrence
must take place DURING the policy period shown on the declarations.
- The loss must
be discovered by the named insured DURING the policy period or the
extended discovery period.
All of the above are subject to:
- Condition
E.1.g: Extended Period To Discover Loss;
- Condition
E.1.k: Loss Sustained During Prior Insurance Issued By Us Or Any
Affiliate;
- Condition
E.1.l: Loss Sustained During Prior Insurance Not Issued By Us Or Any
Affiliate; and
- Definitions of
the terms discovered and occurrence in Section F of the coverage form.
The 05 06 change eliminated the Loss Sustained Condition and moved it
into the insuring agreement. It also added a reference to important conditions
that affect the losses covered. One final change was the addition of a
definition for the term "discovered."
1. Employee Theft
Employee theft covers
losses to money, securities and other property. It covers the unlawful taking
of covered insured property by employees. Coverage applies regardless of the
number of employees involved in the loss. This is an important point, since the
limit of insurance applies to each act and not to each employee. In this insuring agreement, theft includes
forgery (05 06 addition).
Example: Ten employees at Easy Pickings, Inc. devise a scheme to
siphon cash from the accounts receivable. The total loss is $500,000. The
policy limit of insurance for employee theft is $200,000. Easy Pickings, Inc.
argues that each employee should be covered for $200,000 with a total
possible loss payout of $2,000,000. The company argues in vain. The policy
coverage pays the limit per occurrence, not per employee. Because the
employees are all part of the same scheme, the policy limit of $200,000
applies.
|
Example: An employee at Easy Pickings steals merchandise from the
warehouse and sells it to friends. This employee's actions were completely
separate from the ten-person scheme so the $200,000 limit of insurance on the
policy applies separately to this claim.
|
2. Forgery and Alteration
This insuring agreement
applies to the actions of outsiders. Coverage does not apply to forgery or
alteration of checks done by the named insured or any employee, manager,
director, trustee or representative. Coverage applies only to checks drawn on the
named insured's accounts or the accounts of any party while acting as an
insured's agent. Checks include drafts, promissory notes, and orders or
directions to pay money. It also
includes substitute checks as defined by the Check Clearing for the 21st
Century Act (05 06 addition). A check can allegedly have been drawn,
meaning there may be some doubt whether the check was actually drawn, against:
- An insured's account;
- Another party's account; or
- An account that no longer exists.
Example: A thief breaks into Plumber's Palace and steals checks
from the bottom of a stack he finds in the comptroller's office. During the
next few weeks, the thief writes checks against the insured's account until
the cashing of unauthorized checks is reported to the comptroller.
|
One of the unusual
features of this coverage is that it provides defense coverage if the named
insured is sued for refusing to pay on a check or an instrument believed to be
forged or fraudulent. The insurance company must first give its written consent
to the named insured to defend itself against such a suit. It then pays the
reasonable legal expenses relating to defense of the suit. The defense coverage
is unlimited and is in addition to the policy limit for forgery and alteration
coverage.
3. Inside the Premises–Theft of Money and Securities
This insuring agreement
contains three basic coverages:
- It pays for the loss of money and securities from the
insured premises or banking premises caused by:
- Theft committed
by a person actually present inside (05 06 change) the
premises or a banking premises; or
- Disappearance or destruction of money or
securities.
This
insuring agreement does not cover merchandise or stock. Premises are considered
to be the interior of the building occupied by the named insured and from which
business is conducted. Banking premises is also defined.
- It covers damage to the interior of the premises and
to the exterior of the building during an attempted or actual theft. In
order for coverage to apply to damage to the exterior of the building, the
named insured must either own the building or be legally liable for damage
to its exterior.
- It covers damage incurred during an attempted or
actual theft to locked safes, vaults, cash registers, cash boxes and cash
drawers inside the premises.
4. Inside the Premises–Robbery or Safe Burglary of Other Property
Other property means
property other than money and securities having intrinsic value and not
otherwise excluded. Intrinsic is defined by the American Heritage College Dictionary as "of or relating to the
essential nature of a thing; inherent." A chair has intrinsic value. An idea,
in and of itself, has no intrinsic value unless it is applied and made into
something.
Under this insuring
agreement, coverage applies only to robbery of a custodian or to safe burglary.
The act must take place within premises located in a described building.
Robbery is a subset of theft that involves actual bodily harm or the threat of
bodily harm, violence or intimidation or the unlawful taking of property
witnessed by another person. A custodian may be the named insured, members,
partners or employees but NOT watchpersons or janitors.

|

|
NOT A CUSTODIAN
|
A CUSTODIAN
|
Losses from robberies either
during normal business hours or after hours that do not involve watchpersons or
janitors are covered. A person working late and turning on the alarm before
leaving is not a watchperson, unless hired specifically to have custody of the
property (with no other duties). A watchperson is the security guard hired to
watch the premises during normal business hours.
Example: Eric is working late. He is asked to lock up when he
leaves, meaning he has custody of the premises. However, he is not a
watchperson or a janitor. He sees the cleaning staff opening desk drawers to
dust inside. The next day, several people are missing valuable tools,
software and other items. Eric believes they were stolen by the cleaning
staff. Since he was not threatened and did not actually witness an obvious
act of stealing, there is no coverage under this insuring agreement.
|
Under this insuring
agreement, damage to the premises from an attempted or actual act of robbery or
safe burglary is covered as well as damage to a LOCKED safe or vault. If an
open safe or vault is damaged during a robbery, it is not covered. However, a
loss to property inside the safe or vault is covered.
5. Outside the Premises
Money and securities are
covered for theft, disappearance and destruction while outside the premises and
in the custody of a messenger or armored car company. Coverage includes theft,
robbery or other instances of accidental loss.
Example: A suitcase full of cash bounces out of the back of a
pickup truck, tumbles across a bridge, falls 120 feet into a river and is
never recovered. This situation would be eligible for coverage.
|
Other property is covered
outside the premises when it is in the custody of a messenger or an armored car
company but only for robbery. Robbery must include at least the threat of
bodily harm, violence or intimidation or the messenger must actually observe
the commission of an unlawful act.
Example: A crate of rare vases that bounces out of a truck and
falls to the river below never to be seen again is not covered but coverage
applies if that same vehicle is car-jacked and the robber throws the crate
into the river.
|
In either case, a
messenger must be the named insured or a partner or employee of the named
insured. Employees do not include independent contractors (other than an
armored car company), leased employees or any agent or broker. Coverage for
leased employees may be added by using Form CR 25 05–Include Leased Workers As
Employees.
Example: Pink Elephant Phine Liquors arranges to have its truck
fleet operated by truck drivers leased from Perki Personnel, a professional
employment organization. When delivering a load of liquor to a Pink Elephant
warehouse, the driver is robbed at gunpoint. There is no coverage for this
claim because the leased driver was not a messenger as defined in the policy.
|
6. Computer Fraud
This insuring agreement
covers money, securities and other property fraudulently transferred by
computer from the insured premises or banking premises to a location other than
the insured premises or the banking premises. It does not include transfer to a
messenger. Coverage is worldwide. A fraudulent transfer of funds from an
insured's Swiss bank account to someone in the United States is covered in the
same way as a person breaking an office and uses an insured's computer to
transfer funds from the insured's account to his or her Swiss bank account.
Coverage also applies if someone remotely hacks into an insured's computer and sends
money to the thief's personal bank account. Coverage applies to locations and
premises outside the United
States.
Example: Josie Proust, the top salesperson for Cyberfroot
Distributors, was staying in a hotel in Beijing.
She regularly conducted business from her room. While at a meeting with a
local group of lychee and pomegranate farmers, someone broke into her room,
stole some of her valuables and hacked into her laptop to transfer funds from
her account. This insuring agreement covers this computer fraud loss.
|
7. Funds Transfer Fraud
This insuring agreement
provides coverage for the loss of funds resulting directly from a fraudulent
instruction directing a financial institution to transfer, pay or deliver funds
from the insured's transfer account.
8. Money Orders and Counterfeit Money (05 06 change)
This insuring agreement
covers counterfeit money accepted in
good faith in exchange for purchases. It also covers money orders accepted by
the named insured in good faith but not accepted when presented by the named
insured for payment. The coverage territory is limited to the United States, its territories, its possessions
and Canada.
There is no coverage for fake euros when traveling in Europe.
Note: Cashier's
checks and other negotiable instruments are NOT covered.
Related Article:
Counterfeit Cashier's Checks
The 05 06 edition replaces the phrase counterfeit paper currency with
the defined term counterfeit money. This is a significant increase in coverage
because the defined term includes traveler's checks, register checks and money
orders in addition to currency, bank notes and coins.
The limit shown on the
declarations is the most paid for all
loss that results from an occurrence (05
06 change). If a loss is covered
under more than one insuring agreement, the company pays ONLY the largest limit
of insurance available and not the sum of each available limit (05 06 change).
In some cases, this could create a significant reduction in coverage.
Example: Acme Company sustains a loss that involves both
employees and non-employees. It is found to be a single occurrence and
coverage is available under Insuring Agreements 1, 3 and 7. The coverage
limit is $300,000 under Insuring Agreement 1, $100,000 under Insuring
Agreement 3 and $250,000 under Insuring Agreement 7. The total loss is
$500,000. In the previous edition, Acme could have recovered under each of
the insuring agreements and have been fully compensated. Under the current
edition, the maximum recovery is $300,000, the highest limit available.
|
A situation like this
could have claimants and claimant attorneys searching for ways to utilize the
differing definitions of occurrence within the insuring agreements so a loss
situation may qualify as a multiple occurrence.
Each of the eight
insuring agreements can have a different deductible. In most cases, smaller
accounts do not require deductibles for most coverages. The insurance company
does not pay any loss until the deductible amount stated on the declarations is
satisfied.
In previous editions,
the policy indicated that if different deductibles exist for a given loss, only
the highest deductible was applied. In the 05 06 edition, this provision is
removed. When the deductible provision is now read in conjunction with the
limit of insurance, it can be implied that the applicable deductible is the one
shown on the declarations and associated with the highest limit of insurance.
However, it is not stated this way. With the removal of the deductible
limitation language, confusion may arise about which or how many deductibles
apply to a given loss. Due to this ambiguity, an insured could argue that the
lowest (or even that NO) deductible, should be used. In such disputes, any ambiguity
could be construed in favor of an insured's interpretation.
Example: Continuing the Acme example above, the
deductible for Insuring Agreement 1 is $10,000, the deductible for Insuring
Agreement 3 is $1,000 and Insuring Agreement 7 has no deductible. The insured
argues that no deductible should apply but the insurance company argues that
the deductible that should apply is $10,000.
|
1. These exclusions apply to each of the eight insuring agreements,
unless otherwise stated.
a. Acts Committed by You, Your Partners or Members
Any theft or dishonest
act of the named insured, whether committed alone or with another individual or
an employee, is excluded. The named insured cannot claim coverage for the
dishonest act of an employee if the named insured is involved in the same
misdeed. For the purposes of this exclusion, a member is an owner of a Limited
Liability Corporation (LLC).
b. Acts of Employees Learned of by You Prior to the Policy Period
This exclusion applies to losses committed by employees with a history
of committing a dishonest act. If the named insured, partners, members,
managers, officers, directors or trustees hire an individual that one or more
of them knows has committed theft or engaged in dishonest acts prior to the
policy period, coverage does not apply to any loss caused by that employee.
However, coverage does apply if the member, partner, manager, officer,
director or trustee aware of the dishonest acts is in collusion with the
employee to commit the theft or dishonest act.
Example: Trent
has a troubled background. Rick, the vice president of operations, hires Trent to help him with
inventory. Rick uses Trent
and his shady contacts to help him fence items they steal from their
company's warehouse. When the loss is discovered, the insurance company
cannot deny coverage. This is because Rick is the only one at the company
aware of Trent's
dishonest past.
|
c. Acts of Employees, Managers, Directors, Trustees or Representatives
This exclusion applies to
all insuring agreements EXCEPT Insuring Agreement A.1, Employee Theft. In
addition to excluding acts committed by an insured, other dishonest acts, such
as forgery, committed by employees and outside persons working together are
also excluded.
d. Confidential Information (05 06 addition)
This new exclusion explains that the crime policy is not designed to
cover losses due to identify theft. Any loss caused by or resulting from any
disclosure or use of the named insured's confidential information is not
covered. This includes, but is not limited to, patents, trade secrets,
processing methods or customer lists.
In addition, any loss caused by or resulting from any disclosure of confidential
information of others, such as financial or personal information is not
covered.
This is considered to be a clarifying exclusion, because the policy was
never intended to cover such losses.
Example: Marguerite works in Acme College's
Record's Department. Her boyfriend, Phillip, asks for some information about
his roommate, Paul, and uses it to steal Paul's identity. Paul discovers the
identity theft when he attempts to secure a student loan. The police track
the release of information to Phillip and Marguerite, both of whom have left
town. Paul demands that the school system compensate him for the monetary
loss due to Marguerite's actions but the insurance company denies coverage
under the crime insuring agreements.
|
e. Government Action
Loss resulting from
government seizure, forfeiture, and other taking or destruction of property is
not covered.
Example: The owner of Shot Docks Bass Boat Rentals files a claim
for the loss of a boat. The boat is valued at $37,000 and the owner states
that "some official persons" took it from her premises. The claims adjuster
questions her and denies the claim. He learns that the boat was confiscated
under a federal controlled substances law.
|
f. Indirect Loss
Indirect losses that are
ineligible for coverage include:
- Loss of income as a result of not being able to use
money, securities or other property. This means that coverage does not
apply to loss of interest income on money that could have been invested.
There is no coverage for loss of income on stock holdings that could have
appreciated during an upturn in the market. Finally, loss of profit due to
the loss of a chance to sell product stolen from an insured is not
covered. Business income coverage available in commercial property forms
pays for the loss of income on property other than money or securities.
Related
Article: Time Element Coverage Forms Analysis
·
Legal liability claims. Coverage for property of
others is available only by endorsement. However, some direct damage coverage
is provided in specific insuring agreements.
- The cost of establishing the amount of a loss. Such costs
can be substantial.
Examples:
-
The expense of hiring auditors to examine
books "cooked" by an employee
-
The cost of independent investigators hired to
ferret out the scope of a financial loss and who caused it.
-
The cost of hiring forensic or other
specialists to determine what missing inventory was stolen and what was
simply part of an inventory shortage.
Coverage for these
costs and expenses is available by attaching Form CR 25 40–Include Expenses
Incurred To Establish Amount Of Covered Loss.
|
Related Article: Commercial Crime Coverages
Available Endorsements and Their Uses
g. Legal Fees, Costs and Expenses
Costs, fees or legal
expenses incurred by the insured for any reason, including those for a covered
loss, are not covered EXCEPT under Insuring Agreement A.2, Forgery and
Alteration.
h. Nuclear Hazard
Losses caused by or
related to nuclear energy in any manner are not covered.
i. Pollution (05 06 change)
There is no coverage for any loss or damage resulting from pollution
and pollution is defined within the exclusion. The definition is identical to
the one used in ISO property coverage forms. While there are no court cases to
justify this addition, it is added as a precaution against attempts to obtain
pollution coverage through policies not having pollution exclusions.
j. War and Military Action
Losses caused by or
related to war or warlike action, including
rebellion, insurrection, revolution and government power used to defend against
such actions, are not covered (05 06
change).
This wording is similar to what is found in other ISO property coverage
forms.
2. These exclusions apply to Insuring Agreement A.1: Employee Theft
Coverage.
a. The Employee Cancelled Under Prior Insurance exclusion has been
rewritten, broadened and is now Exclusion 1.b: Acts of Employees Learned by You
Prior to the Policy Period (05 06 change).
a. Inventory Shortages
There is no coverage for
shortages of money, securities or other property if the only proof of loss is
discovery of a shortage via an inventory. This also includes profit or loss
calculations, such as mistakes on the books or in ledgers. However, for
eligible losses, an insured's books, ledgers and inventory records may be used
to substantiate the amount of the loss.
b. Trading
Losses resulting from
trading are excluded. Trading activities include stock-trading losses,
commodity-trading losses, and merchandise-trading losses (where batches of
product are exchanged). Certain trading losses to a genuine, not a fictional,
account are covered by CR 25 16–Add Trading Coverage.
Related Article:
Commercial Crime Coverages Available Endorsements and Their Uses
c. Warehouse Receipts
Warehouse receipts document
storage and transfers of products between, usually, separate entities. A
fraudulent transfer can occur when property is delivered to someone not
authorized to receive it. A forged instrument is frequently used by an
individual having a seemingly legitimate claim to the property, but does not.
Coverage does not apply to these situations or to errors in issuing, signing, canceling
or failing to cancel any warehouse receipt. CR 25 17–Add Warehouse Receipts
Coverage can be attached to insure fraudulent transfer of warehouse receipts.
Related Article:
Commercial Crime Coverages Available Endorsements and Their Uses
Warehouse Operators Legal
Liability Coverage, an inland marine coverage, can also be purchased to cover
fraudulent or other improper or negligent transfer of goods, other than by
employee theft.
Related Article:
ISO Warehouse Operators Legal Liability Coverage Form
3. The following exclusions apply to Insuring Agreements A.3: Inside
the Premises–Theft of Money and Securities, A.4: Inside the Premises–Robbery or
Safe Burglary of Other Property, and A.5: Outside the Premises.
a. Accounting or Arithmetical Errors or Omissions
Loss that is caused
merely by mathematical errors is excluded. There is no standard endorsement
available to "buy back" this exclusion or to purchase this coverage.
b. Exchanges or Purchases
There is no coverage for
loss in any exchange or purchase of any property. There is no standard
endorsement available to "buy back" this exclusion or to purchase
this coverage.
Example: A customer pays the marked price of $2,000 for a piece
of furniture. It is determined later that the price should have been $20,000.
Further investigation shows that the mistaken marking was an act of
intentional fraud and the customer provided information that was also
fraudulent. Even though this appears to be criminal activity, coverage does
not apply because this loss was the result of a purchase.
|
c. Fire
There is no coverage for damage (05/06 addition) or loss caused
by fire except:
(1)
Coverage applies for loss or damage to money and securities. This is very
important because no other commercial property coverage forms protect against
fire damage to money and securities.
(2)
Damage to a safe or a vault. This is duplicate coverage with the property
coverage forms and could be considered primary to the property form since it is
specific in nature.
d. Money Operated Devices
Theft of money from
vending machines or other money or coin-operated devices is not covered unless the
money is continuously counted and recorded by the machine itself. There is no
standard endorsement available to "buy back" this exclusion or to
purchase broader coverage.
e. Motor Vehicles or Equipment and Accessories
Damage to any motor
vehicle, its accessories or trailer is excluded. Coverage for theft of motor
vehicles is available under commercial automobile comprehensive coverage,
garage dealer coverage and garagekeepers' liability
coverage. It is also available for vehicle manufacturers through commercial
property coverage forms. The term "motor vehicle" is not defined in this
coverage form as it is in other ISO forms.
f. Transfer or Surrender of Property
Loss or damage to
property given to someone outside the premises or banking premises because of
unauthorized instructions is not covered. Coverage does not apply to property
given up because of the threat of either bodily harm or property damage. There
is also no coverage for property relinquished due to computer-generated threats
to harm the named insured's products or to release confidential information (05
06 addition). However, since this type of activity is considered to be a
form of extortion, coverage is available by purchasing Optional Insuring
Agreement CR 04 03–Extortion–Commercial Entities or by purchasing a
Kidnap/Ransom and Extortion Policy.
Related Article:
CR 04 03–Extortion–Commercial Entities
This exclusion does not
apply to Insuring Agreement A.5, Outside the Premises, if the property was in
the custody of a messenger who had no knowledge of the threat at the time the
trip began, or who knew about the threat but was the victim of an entirely
different threat.
g. Vandalism
Vandalism losses to the
building, premises, safes or cash drawers are not covered. Vandalism is
properly insured under commercial property coverage forms. In certain
situations, vandalism and theft are concurrent causes of loss. These are
different losses that occur at the same time.
Example: During a riot, vandals break a business's showroom
windows and steal merchandise. Some time later, other persons climb through
the debris to steal fixtures and other building materials. Vandalism is the
proximate cause of the theft loss and the building losses should be covered
by the property policy. Theft of merchandise by the burglars who climb
through the broken windows is covered under Crime Insuring Agreement A.4,
Inside the Premises–Robbery or Safe Burglary of Other Property.
|
h. Voluntary Parting with Title to or Possession of Property
There is no coverage if
an insured voluntarily parts with title to or possession of any covered
property because of a trick or scheme concocted by another party. There is no
standard endorsement available to "buy back" this exclusion or to
purchase this coverage.
4. The following exclusions apply to Insuring Agreement A. 6: Computer
Fraud.
a. The Exchanges or Purchases exclusion is eliminated and replaced by
the Credit Card Transactions exclusion (05 06 change).
a. Credit Card Transactions
Coverage does not apply if the loss is the result of use of any type of
credit, debit, charge or other similar card.
b. Funds Transfer Fraud
There is no coverage if
the loss is a result of a fraudulent instruction directing a financial
institution to transfer, pay or deliver funds from the transfer account to an
unauthorized party. Coverage for this exposure is available under Insuring
Agreement A.7, Funds Transfer Fraud.
c. Inventory Shortages
Losses where the only
evidence of loss is an incorrect inventory count or a profit and loss statement
computation error are not covered.
d. The Voluntary Parting with Title to or Possession of Property
exclusion is eliminated. However, since credit cards are often used in such
transactions, coverage is still probably not available because of the Credit
Card Transactions exclusion (05 06 change).
5. The following exclusion applies to Insuring Agreement A. 7: Funds
Transfer Fraud.
Loss due to using a
computer to fraudulently transfer money, securities or other property is not
covered. Coverage for this exposure is available under Insuring Agreement A.6,
Computer Fraud.
1. Conditions Applicable to All Insuring Agreements
a. The Cancellation as to Any Employee exclusion is eliminated from
this section and moved to Conditions that apply to Insurance Agreement A.1 only
(05 06 change).
a. Additional Premises or Employees (05 06 addition)
When a named insured adds employees and/or premises, coverage
automatically applies without an additional premium charge during that policy
term. The only exception is when the new premises or employees are the result
of a consolidation, merger or acquisition. Refer to the consolidation, merger
or acquisition condition below for information on the exception.
b. Concealment, Misrepresentation or Fraud
Any fraudulent act
committed by the insured voids coverage. Intentional concealment or
misrepresentation of a material fact about the property covered, the insured's
interest in the covered property or in any claim also voids coverage. Voiding
coverage includes existing claims as well as future claims.
c. Consolidation–Merger or Acquisition (05 06 change)
Coverage applies for 90
days for newly acquired entities, premises, assets or liabilities of another
entity and its employees. The coverage is automatic but the insurance company
must receive written notice of the acquisition. There is no coverage after 90
days unless the insurance company adds it to the policy. Additional premium may
be required. The only losses covered are those that occur AFTER the date of consolidation,
merger or acquisition.
d. Cooperation (05 06 addition)
The named insured must be cooperative and work with the insurance
company with respect to all insurance policy terms and conditions.
e. Duties in the Event of Loss
·
If illegal activity is involved or suspected,
let the insurance company and the police know about the loss as soon as
possible. The police do not need to be notified if the loss involves employee
theft or alteration or forgery.
- Submit to an examination under oath and sign a
statement. This is required when requested by the insurance company.
- Provide any records considered pertinent to the
loss to the insurance company so it can examine them as needed (05 06
addition).
- Provide a detailed, sworn proof of loss within 120
days after the date of loss. This is longer than in most policies, because
of the extraordinarily long amount of time that may be needed to work
through a complicated employee theft scheme or other fraud, and where
trails of money or computer fraud are involved.
- Cooperate with the insurance company in the
investigation and claim settlement.
f. Employee Benefit Plans
Insuring Agreement A.1,
Employee Theft coverage applies to the employee benefit plans listed on the
declarations. This is not employment practices legal liability coverage that
covers such things as forgetting to enroll an employee during the open
enrollment period. Employee benefit plans coverage applies to fraudulent or
dishonest acts, such as theft of retirement funds by an employee.
- Only the plans listed on the declarations are covered
under Insuring Agreement A.1, Employee Theft.
Example: The
Jones Company Retirement Plan is listed on the declarations as covered. If
the plan administrator changes but the plan name does not, coverage continues.
Example: The Jones Company Retirement
Plan through ABC Funding is listed on the declarations as covered. If the
insured transfers the plan's assets to DEF Funding, replacing ABC Funding,
coverage does not apply to the new plan unless the policy is endorsed to
recognize the change.
|
- For plans that are jointly insured with any other
insured plan, the insured is responsible for making sure the limit of
insurance is enough to cover the plans as if they were insured separately.
This language is included because federal laws require some employee
retirement and other benefit plans to carry a specific limit of fidelity
coverage. This provision places the responsibility for selecting that
limit on the insured and not on the insurance company.
- This coverage pays only for loss of funds and other plan
property. It does not apply to loss to desks or other property associated
with the administration of the plan.
- If the first named insured is not the same name as
the covered employee benefit plan, any loss payment must be held by the
insured for the benefit of the plan. In other words, the insured is not
permitted to commingle loss payment or claim funds with general business
funds.
- If the policy covers two or more employee benefit
plans, losses arising out of one occurrence are shared by the funds in the
same proportion as the required limit in each plan bears to the total limit
required for all plans which share the loss. Any payment due is made
directly to the plan or plans sustaining the loss (05 06 addition).
Example: A loss of $100,000 is
suffered by three plans that share coverage under the same crime policy.
Covered Plan A requires a limit of $500,000, Covered Plan B requires a limit
of $200,000 and Covered Plan C requires a limit of $50,000. The policy limit
is $1,000,000. The policy reimburses Plan A 500/750 of the loss, Plan B
200/750 of the loss and Plan C 50/750 of the loss.
|
- No deductible
applies to employee benefit plan coverage
g. Extended Period to Discover Loss
Losses must occur prior
to the cancellation date of coverage but may be discovered:
- Within one year from the date of cancellation.
However, if another policy covering the same loss was purchased to replace
the insurance under this policy, the extended period of discovery ends
immediately.
Example: Peggy had no idea that employees were skimming money
from the cash registers. Her crime policy expired on January 1, 2007 and was
not renewed. She discovered the loss on June 10, 2007. The loss is covered if
the employees began stealing the money from the cash registers before January
1, 2007 and during the previous policy period, January 1, 2006 through
December 31, 2006.
|
- Within one year from the date of cancellation if the
coverage applies to employee benefits plan. There is no exception.
h. Joint Insured
- The first named insured acts for all other insureds,
unless excluded, deleted or, for some reason, is ineligible for coverage.
In that case, the next named insured listed becomes the first named
insured. The first named insured is responsible for premium payments and
receives all notices issued by the insurance company, such as cancellation
notices.
Example: The named insured reads John Wilson, Wilson, Inc.,
Wilson, LLC and Wilson, Johnson and Miles. As the first named insured, John
Wilson is responsible for paying the premium. He does not pay and, because he
is the first named insured, he receives the cancellation notice. He does not
notify any of the other entities that the coverage is cancelled. Afterwards,
when a loss occurs, the other named insureds have no recourse against the
insurance company because the first named insured had been notified.
|
- Knowledge by one insured of anything affecting the
insurance coverage is considered to be knowledge held by all insureds.
This is an important point because not all insureds on the policy may be
wholly owned by the first named insured. They may be partnerships or
corporations involving significant outside ownership.
Example: Prior to the
policy cancellation, John Wilson lets Wilson, Johnson and Miles hire Millie, one
of his employees. John forgets to tell Wilson, Johnson and Miles that Millie has
a criminal record. Since all named insureds are considered to know what each
of the others knows, any employee theft losses involving Millie are excluded.
|
- An employee of one insured is an employee of all
insureds.
- The extended period to discover loss condition
applies separately to each insured.
Example: John Wilson does
not purchase any replacement coverage so he has a one-year extended period to
discover loss. Once the other named insureds realized the policy had been
canceled they bought additional coverage. Their extended period to discover
loss ends on the effective date of the new coverage.
|
- The limit of insurance applies to all insureds. A
separate limit does not apply to each insured.
Example: All three named insureds shared a single bookkeeper.
When she didn't return from her vacation, it was discovered that all accounts
had been emptied. John Wilson sustains a $100,000 loss, Wilson, Johnson and
Miles has a $75,000 loss and Wilson LLC has a $50,000 loss from this single
occurrence. The insurance company will pay only a total of $100,000 (its
stated policy limit).
|
- When the insurance company pays the first named
insured for a loss, the claim is satisfied for all named insureds. The one
exception is employee benefit plans, which must receive a separate
settlement (05 06 addition).
Example: The insurance company pays John Wilson the
$100,000 loss. He takes the payment and leaves town. The other two named
insureds are left with no payment and no recourse except against John
Wilson's assets.
|
i. Legal Action Against Us
As with most policies, no
insured can pursue legal action until that insured has complied with all the
policy terms. An insured must wait up to 90 days after filing a proof of loss
and any lawsuit must be filed within two years of the date the insured
discovered the loss, not the date the loss was filed. If a state law or local
statute requires different time periods, the policy is amended or conformed to
comply with those requirements.
j. Liberalization
If the insurance company
broadens coverage without making an additional premium charge during the policy
period or within 45 days before the start of the policy period, the broadened
coverage applies.
k. Loss Sustained During Prior Insurance Issued by Us or Any Affiliate
Note: The Loss Covered Under This Insurance and Prior Insurance Issued
by Us or Any Affiliate condition is removed and replaced by wording in Section
B, Limit of Insurance (05 06 change).
A person or persons may
perform numerous dishonest acts over a period of years before being caught, but
all such acts are considered one occurrence. If the insured maintains
continuous coverage with the same insurer or group of insurance companies,
coverage applies back to the inception date of the continuous coverage.
However, the policy limits do not accumulate because of the multiple years.
Instead, the highest limit available during the total period is available to
settle the total loss over the years in which they occurred. Because of some
confusion and court cases, such as Auto Lenders Acc Ace. Corp.v Gentilini Ford,
Inc., 181 N.J. 245, 854 A.2d 378 2004, the condition now has three parts and
includes three examples.
- If a loss is sustained in part during the current
insurance and in part during prior policies and there was no break in
coverage, the loss in the current policy period is settled first and the
losses in the prior periods are then settled.
- If a loss is sustained entirely during a previous
policy period, there was no break in coverage between the date of loss and
the current policy, and the current policy covers the loss, the insurance
company settles the loss under the most recent previous insurance first
and then settles the remaining amounts during previous insurance.
- Any settlement is made as follows:
- The highest single limit of insurance available
during any policy period when the loss occurred is available for the
loss.
- No settlement is paid until the deductible that
applies under the current policy is satisfied. That deductible is the
only one applied to the entire loss settlement, regardless of the number
of policy periods involved.
Note: While the language in this condition
is lengthier than what existed in t previous form editions, the intent is unchanged.
Examples:
- An employee has been siphoning funds from
Below Ground Enterprises for three years. The insured discovers the loss this
year and calculates the amount at $100,000. The limit of insurance on the
current policy is $100,000 but was only $25,000 three years ago. The loss
payment is $100,000.
- Referring to the
previous example above, the limit was reduced two years ago from $100,000 to
$25,000. The insured is still eligible for the $100,000 loss payment because
the limit of insurance at the time of the occurrence was $100,000.
|
Example: Alice
stole $50,000 two years ago, $20,000 last year and $30,000 this year, for a
total loss from this one occurrence of $100,000. Alice's employer maintained a $50,000
coverage limit in each of these three years. These limits cannot be added
together even though the dishonest acts were perpetrated during each of these
years. The maximum limit available for this one occurrence is $50,000.
|
l. Loss Sustained During Prior Insurance Not Issued by Us or Any
Affiliate
This condition applies only
if there was no lapse in coverage between the current coverage and the previous
coverage. Even a one-day lapse in coverage nullifies this important benefit. If
a loss sustained in a previous policy term is discovered after the end of that
policy's discovery period, coverage applies under the current policy if both
the old and new policy have the same coverage and one immediately replaces the
other. The limit of insurance available is the lesser of the two
policy limits.
Example: Number One, Inc. moved its coverage from STU Accident
and Casualty Insurance Company to the ABC Indemnity Company. It had been with
STU for five years. Number One discovered a loss that occurred during the STU
policy but after the discovery period expired. ABC Indemnity covers the loss
for either the limit of insurance under the STU policy or the limit under
their policy, whichever is less.
|
The coverage available
under this condition cannot be combined with the coverage available under
Condition k. to increase the insurance limits. The limits under Condition k.
are taken into consideration with the limits of the previous company and the
lesser is the one chosen.
The important distinction
is that if coverage stays with one company or group, the highest limit is used
to settle claims. If coverage moves between companies, the lowest limit is used
to settle claims. This creates a significant coverage gap if an insured changes
insurance companies.
m. Other Insurance
This condition is totally rewritten with the 05 06 edition but is not
really changed. It is much clearer than in the previous edition.
If other insurance is written under the
same terms and conditions as this insurance, the policies will share any loss
proportionally. If the other insurance is not written under the same terms and
conditions, this coverage is excess. It pays only after the loss exceeds the
limit of insurance under the other policy or the deductible under this
insurance, whichever is higher. The ability of the insured to collect the other
coverage does not enter into consideration.
Example: Hershel changes insurance carriers. Because of the terms
of the cancellation and non-renewal conditions, the two package policies
overlap by two days. A holdup occurs at his business on one of those
overlapping days.
Scenario one: the two
crime coverages are identical, each contributes equally.
Scenario two: one of
the package policies has an automatic property extension endorsement that
provides holdup coverage with a $2,500 limit. The policy with the extension
is primary and the crime coverages are excess.
|
If this insurance is excess over other
coverage, this coverage only pays after the limit and deductible of the other
coverage is exhausted, whether it is collectible or not. If a deductible
applies to this coverage, the deductible amount is reduced by the amount of the
underlying coverage and the underlying deductible. This means the insured does
not have to jump the hurdle of both the deductible and the underlying limits.
Example: Continuing the example above, each of the two crime
coverages had a $2,500 deductible. Since the property extension had a $2,500
limit, the deductible was satisfied and the crime coverages paid the
remaining loss, subject to the limit of insurance condition.
|
n. Ownership of
Property; Interests Covered
Property covered includes
owned property, leased property and property held for others.
Note: This is an
important change! The prior edition's exception that no coverage applies to
property inside the client's premises and the requirement that the insured be
legally liable for the property of others to be eligible for coverage were
removed (05 06 change).
o. Records
The insured must have
records available that substantiate any loss reported.
p. Recoveries
- Recoveries made by the insurance company, minus
recovery expenses, are returned to the insured until the amount of its
loss above the deductible amount is paid. Any remaining recovery amount is
paid to the insurance company until it is completely reimbursed for the
loss settlement it made. Any additional recovery amounts available go to
the insured to reimburse its deductible. If any money remains after the
first three items are paid, the insured is paid for losses sustained not
covered by this insurance.
- Recoveries do not include reinsurance recoveries by
the insurance company or the cost of original securities if duplicates
have been issued.
q. Territory
The United States, its territories and possessions,
Puerto Rico and Canada
constitute the covered territory. Exceptions apply for Insuring Agreements A.1,
A.2 and A.6 as outlined below.
r. Transfer of Your Rights of Recovery Against Others to Us
The insured cannot waive
subrogation rights for any reason. In most property insurance policies, the
insured can waive rights of subrogation in writing before the loss, but this
option is not available in the crime policy.
s. Valuation–Settlement
(1) The
terms of the limit of insurance section apply first after which the following
applies:
(a)
Money is valued at its face value. If the money is foreign currency, it can be
replaced for the face value of that country's currency or the equivalent in
U.S. dollars at the exchange rate or value published in the Wall Street
Journal on the day the loss was discovered.
(b)
Securities are valued at their price at the close of business on the day the
loss was discovered. Securities are either replaced or cash is paid, at the
insurance company's option. If replaced, the insured must sign over all rights
to the lost securities to the insurance company. The insurance company then
pays for the cost of a lost securities bond, if the cost of the bond is less
than the value of the security or securities at the close of business on the
date the loss was discovered, or the limit of insurance, whichever is less.
(c)
Replacement cost is paid for damage to the premises or other property, subject
to the limit of insurance. The damage must be repaired or replaced promptly. If
it is not, the insurance company pays only the actual cash value of the covered
property.
(2)
Property other than money can be paid for in either the currency of the country
where the loss occurred or the equivalent in United States dollars, at the
exchange rate published in the Wall Street Journal on the date the loss
occurred.
(3) Any
property the insurance company replaces or pays for becomes the property of the
insurance company.
2. Conditions Applicable to Insuring Agreement A.1: Employee Theft
a. Termination as to Any Employee (moved here from Conditions Applying
to All Insuring Agreements) (05 06 addition).
This insuring agreement can cease to apply to any employee. The time
and the manner in which this is done depend on the circumstances.
- As soon as the
named insured, partners, members, managers, officers, directors or
trustees learn that an employee has committed a dishonest act, all
coverage for that employee ends. It does not matter if the dishonest act
happened before or after the employee joined the named insured's business.
The only exception is if one of the named groups of company
representatives was in collusion with the employee and concealed the
dishonest act of the employee in order to further his or her own dishonest
plans.
Example: Sherry is watching a rerun
of a reality crime show and is shocked to see the on screen arrest of Jackie,
who she had hired six months earlier and was considered trustworthy. Sherry
decided not to share this information with her business partners. Two months
later, Jackie disappears along with half of the company inventory. During
examination it is discovered that Sherry had knowledge of Jackie's past so
coverage is denied.
|
- The insurance
company can terminate coverage for an employee by mailing notice to the
named insured at least 30 days before the date that cancellation takes
effect.
b. Territory
Losses caused by
employees located temporarily outside the United
States, its territories and possessions or Canada are covered for up to 90 consecutive days. This coverage
does not apply to employees permanently relocating to another country.
3. Conditions Applicable to Insuring Agreement A.2: Forgery and
Alteration
a. Deductible Amount
No deductible applies to legal expenses.
b. Electronic and Mechanical Signatures
Electronic, mechanical or other similar means of duplicating signatures
are acceptable and considered the same as handwritten signatures.
However, coverage does not apply for electronic signatures that do not produce
a visible handwritten signature but that are used in electronic commerce to
verify the sender and the sender's intent.
c. Proof of Loss
The instrument involved
with the loss, such as the check, must be attached to the proof of loss. If the
instrument cannot be provided, an affidavit describing the cause and amount of
loss must be provided in its place.
d. Territory
The territory condition does not apply to this insuring agreement since
coverage applies anywhere in the world.
4. Conditions Applicable to Insuring Agreement A.4: Inside the
Premises–Robbery or Safe Burglary of Other Property and Insuring Agreement A.5:
Outside the Premises
a. Armored Motor
Vehicle Companies
If a contract is in place
that allows for recovery from the armored vehicle company directly or from its
insurance company, this policy is excess over the recovery amount.
b. Special Limit of
Insurance for Specified Property
The maximum amount
available in any one occurrence for loss of precious metals, precious or
semiprecious stones, pearls, furs or fur articles is $5,000. Fur includes
expensive minks or inexpensive rabbit. This includes articles, whether complete
or not, whose principal value is
derived from the fur, precious metals or precious stones. This limit also
applies to manuscripts, drawings or any kind of records, the cost of
reconstructing them or reproducing any information in them.
Example: The Coat Company manufactures two nearly identical
ladies' jackets. The one trimmed with fur wholesales for $500. The one
without fur trim wholesales for $350. Because the fur trim amounts to only
$150 of the value of the $500 coat, it would not be subject to the limitation
because the value of the fur is less than half of the total value of the
coat.
|
5. Conditions Applicable to Insuring Agreement A.6: Computer Fraud
a. Special Limit of
Insurance for Specified Property
Property consisting of
manuscripts, drawings or records, including the cost of reconstruction or
reproduction, is subject to a $5,000 limitation. There is no further limitation
on electronic records.
b. Territory
The policy territory is
worldwide.
These definitions apply to all crime insuring agreements.
1. Banking premises refers to the interior of a bank or a similar
safe depository. Does it include the vestibule or entrance hall at the bank
where the ATM machine is located? At a main branch, does it extend to the
entire premises, including the securities division and the insurance agency?
Banking premises do not include a stock brokerage or other financial
institution, except a banking institution or similar safe depository. In the
current era of financial services reform, more combination financial
institutions may develop. The premises may house a bank branch in one area and
other functions, such as insurance, stocks and bonds sales and administration,
in other areas of the building. In that situation, would the entire financial
institution be classified as a bank? The policy language is not clear. The
interior of a bank may be best defined by the federal or state laws that apply
to the banking institution where the covered loss occurs.

|

|
The definition of Client is removed in the 05 06 edition.
2. Counterfeit money is a money
imitation designed to deceive and be accepted as real money (05 06 change).
3. Custodian means the insured, including partners, members or
employees having custody of property INSIDE the premises. It does not mean
anyone acting as a watchperson or as a janitor. Watchperson is defined as
someone hired to watch. An employee working late and responsible for locking up
when leaving is not a watchperson. Janitor
is not defined; therefore, a person hired to perform duties such as cleaning or
light maintenance would be the common understanding of the term.
Example: Becky is a very conscientious administrative assistant. Once
she came in on a Sunday night to clean up the company conference room so that
it was ready for a Monday morning partners meeting. Even though she was
performing janitorial type duties she was still considered a custodian
because her job function is that of an administrative assistant.
|
4. Discover or discovered refers to when the named insured has enough
information to reasonably think that a covered loss has occurred or will happen
soon. There is no requirement concerning having knowledge of specific details,
such as the time or location of a loss.
It also means the time when the named insured receives notice of an actual
or potential claim which involves an insured being held liable to another party
for a loss that may be eligible under this insurance policy.
This definition's paragraphs may both cause confusion. The first
concerns the reasonable man theory.
When is there enough information to prompt a reasonable person to get an insurance
company involved? The second paragraph refers to "notice" but does not define
the word. The result is that interpreting the matter could lead to legal action
and court decisions.
5. Employee:
a. Employees ARE:
- Natural persons employed by the insured and for up to
30 days after termination of employment. This time period does not apply to any employee terminated due to
his or her dishonest acts (05 06 addition). The person must be
compensated directly by salary, wages or commissions and the insured must
have the right to direct or control the activities of the person. The
difference between employees and independent contractors can be vague and
is somewhat fluid. Recent employment cases have scrutinized long-term
independent contracts to determine whether individuals are truly
independent or are de facto employees. Each situation is different and
requires expert legal advice to determine whether these persons should be
considered as employees or not.
Example: Kent fires employee Bob. On Bob's
last day at work, Kent
collects his keys and other items as Bob removes his personal items. However,
Bob made and kept a duplicate key. Two weeks after being fired, he uses this
key to steal merchandise from Kent's
warehouse. Bob is an employee under the definition and Insuring Agreement A.1
Employee Theft provides coverage for his actions.
|
- Temporary employees are employees if they are hired
to meet seasonal or short-term workloads or to substitute for permanent
employees on leave. Insurance coverage does not apply when temporary
employees have custody of property OUTSIDE the insured premises. They
would not be covered as a messenger or even when operating the outside
cash register during a sidewalk sale.
- Leased employees are employees. There must be a written
agreement between the insured and a labor-leasing firm for the leased
employee to perform duties related to the insured's business. A leased
employee is not a temporary employee as described above.
- Trustees and officers of the employee benefit plan,
as well as the plan employees, are employees. Third-party administrators
or other independent contractors hired to administer covered employee
benefit plan(s) are not
employees. Directors or trustees of the named insured plans are considered
employees while handling funds and other property that belong to the plan.
A plan director may have administrative duties relating only to the plan
but have nothing else to do with the insured's business.
- A former employee, director, partner, member,
manager, representative or trustee used as a consultant is an employee.
- Guest students or interns pursuing studies or duties
are employees, unless they have care and custody of the insured's property
outside the covered premises.
- Employees of
merged or consolidated entities are employees, provided the merger or
consolidation occurred before the effective date of the current policy (05
06 addition).
- Managers,
directors or trustees are employees when performing duties usual to those
of an employee or when serving on a committee at the request of the board
of directors or board of trustees. A director is not an employee when
sitting in board meetings or doing director tasks (05 06 change).
b. Employees ARE NOT agents, brokers, factors, commission
merchants, consignees, independent contractors or other similar parties and others not specifically mentioned as
employees (05 06 change).
6. Employee benefit plan means any welfare or pension plan subject
to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Insurable plans
include defined benefit pension, target benefit, profit sharing, 401(k), Keogh,
Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) Plans, group health, life, disability,
unemployment and cafeteria (Section 125) plans and prepaid legal services.
Government plans such as Social Security are not included.
7. Forgery is the signing of someone else's name with the intent to
deceive. However, forgery does not apply when the insured or an employee signs
something for which he or she has no signature authority.
8. Fraudulent instruction means any of three different things:
·
An electronic, telegraphic, cable, teletype,
telefacsimile or telephone instruction supposedly transmitted by the insured
but actually transmitted by someone else without the insured's knowledge.
·
A written instruction issued by the insured
forged or altered by someone without the insured's knowledge or consent.
·
An electronic, telegraphic, cable, teletype,
fax, telephone or written instruction initially received by the insured,
supposedly transmitted by an employee, but sent by someone else without the
insured's or the employee's knowledge or consent.
9. Funds are money and securities and are usually associated with
an employee benefit plan.
10. Manager is a person who is a director of a limited liability
company. Manager is not the typical employee with supervisory responsibilities.
That person would be considered an employee.
11. Member is an owner of a limited liability company. A member may
also be a manager.
12. Messenger includes the insured, the insured's relatives,
partners, members or any employee having care and custody of the property
outside the premises. If the named insured is either an individual or a
partnership, a relative is considered a messenger when having custody of
property outside the premises. If the business is a corporation, it does not
have relatives. However, the president's spouse as well as the spouse of a
rank-and-file employee could be considered a messenger.
13. Money is currency, coin or bank notes in current use with a
face value. Money also means traveler's checks, register checks and money
orders held for sale. Register checks are no longer used in the banking
industry but the term remains. Cashier's checks are NOT considered money.
14. Occurrence
This definition is significantly expanded in the 05 06 edition. The
coverage intent is the same but wording has been added to clarify the intent
due to ambiguities cited in Auto Lenders Acceptance Corporation v. Gentilini
Ford, Inc. 181 N.J. 245, 854 A 2.d 378 2004. The major change is that the
emphasis is on the individual committing the act instead of the act itself. The
defined occurrence must take place during the policy period or in the period
defined in Condition E.1.k or Condition E.1.l.
Under Insuring Agreement
A.1, Employee Theft, an act or acts
committed by an employee acting alone or with other persons is an occurrence.
The act or acts can be by an individual, the combined total of several related
or unrelated acts or a series of related or unrelated acts.
Examples:
Five employees work
together to skim money at different times and by different means from their
company's accounts. This is treated as a single occurrence.
Five employees who do
not know of each other's plans or what they are doing skim money at different
times and by different means from their company's accounts. This is treated
as five different occurrences.
|
Under Insuring Agreement
A.2, Forgery or Alteration, forgery of
one or more instruments committed by
a person acting alone or with other persons is an occurrence. The act or acts
can be by an individual, the combined total of several related or unrelated
acts or a series of related or unrelated acts.
Under all other insuring
agreements, an act or acts committed by
a single person or with other persons is an occurrence. The act or acts can be
by an individual, the combined total of several related or unrelated acts or a
series of related or unrelated acts. This also includes an act or acts not
committed by ANY person.
Example: A theft ring is never identified but evidence shows it
has been at work in the insured's plant for five months and has stolen
hundreds of different products. This constitutes one occurrence.
|
15. Other property must have intrinsic or inherent value, cannot be
money or securities and must not be property otherwise excluded. It does not include computer programs,
electronic data or specifically excluded property (05 06 addition).
16. Premises are the interior PORTION of the building occupied by
the insured and used to conduct its business. What portion of the building is
occupied when the insured is a tenant in a mall with an interior corridor or
the insured operates with a pushcart or kiosk in the mall? What about the
storage locker located in a separate part of the mall? The lease would be the
starting point to determine the meaning of premises in these situations.
17. Robbery is the unlawful taking of covered property from someone
having custody of it and where actual bodily harm or threat of bodily harm is
involved. It can also be an obviously unlawful act witnessed by the person
having custody of the covered property.
Example: A customer in a store is observed shoplifting at the end
of the aisle and security is called. Until and unless that customer threatens
or harms an employee, a robbery has not taken place.
|
Example: An employee is taking a package of product from one
store to another. When the employee is stopped at a stop sign, a pedestrian
reaches into the vehicle and steals the package. This is a robbery because
the employee witnessed it being removed.
|
18. Safe burglary requires evidence of forcible entry into or the
removal of the entire safe or vault from the premises.
19. Securities include negotiable and nonnegotiable instruments
that represent money or property. Some securities may represent commodities,
such as grain or coal. Securities also include tokens, tickets, revenue and
other stamps, including stamps in a postage meter. Securities can also be
evidence of debt related to credit or charge cards but only if the evidence of
debt is against a card not issued to the insured.
20. Theft is the unlawful taking of any covered property. The theft
must be to the deprivation or loss of the insured. If the item stolen has no
value, there is no theft according to this definition.
21. Transfer account is an account maintained by the insured at a
financial institution from which funds may be transferred, paid or delivered by
means of electronic, telegraphic, cable, teletype, telephone or fax
instructions. This is done through an electronic funds transfer system or by
written instructions that permit certain types of electronic transfers to be
completed.
22. Watchperson is a person retained specifically to have care and
custody of property INSIDE the premises and having no other duties. If the
insured hires a watchperson who also patrols the grounds, this person does not
meet the definitions of watchperson for the purposes of this insurance.