Craig had to drive Candice’s car in order to reset the check engine warning light after he repaired it. He received her permission to drive 60 miles in order to pick up his son and reset the engine warning light. The check engine light might have reset but the vehicle unfortunately sustained further damage when he rear-ended a vehicle driven by Jeanette and Gloria who then sued his employer, among others.
Craig’s employer, Gabe’s Auto, notified its auto and general liability carriers of the accident. Charter Oak, its general liability carrier, refused to provide any coverage because it was an auto accident. Gabe’s argued that there was coverage because it was a garage operation and Craig was driving a customer’s auto. Charter Oak pointed out that driving a customer’s auto is covered but only when on premises or next to it.
The question was: How close is “next to it”?
Click here to learn how the court ruled.