(April 2013)
INTRODUCTION
There are two Insurance
Services Office (ISO) Commercial General Liability (CGL) Coverage Forms. CG 00
01 covers on an occurrence basis. It covers liability or damage losses that
occur during the policy period, regardless of when the insurance company is
notified of the loss or claim. The key to this coverage approach is the date of
loss or the period of time when the loss occurs. Coverage triggers based on the
date of the occurrence.
Example: Malarky's Market is insured
under CG 00 01 for the period 03/01/13 to 03/01/14. A customer slips, falls,
and sustains injuries on 04/15/13. In this case, coverage applies because the
fall that resulted in injury occurred during the policy period. However, the
customer neglects to inform Malarky or the
insurance company of the injury until 04/16/14. Even though the claim is reported
more than a year late and during another policy period, Malarky’s
coverage for the period when the injury occurred responds because the injury
occurred during the 03/01/13 to 03/11/14 policy period.
|
CG 00
02 covers on a claims-made basis. Coverage triggers based on the actual
filing date or receipt of the claim, in addition to
the date of loss or injury. It handles any insured loss or claim filed during
the policy period, regardless of when the actual loss or injury occurred,
subject to the retroactive date on the declarations. While the retroactive date
can be any date, it should be the first date that claims-made coverage applied
to the risk. This is because an occurrence coverage form applies to any loss or
damage that occurs prior to that date. Claims-made coverage applies only to covered
losses that occur after the retroactive date.
Example: Referring to the
example above, Malarky is insured under CG 00 02.
All other details are the same. In this case, subject to the retroactive date
and any extended reporting periods, coverage may not apply because it was not
reported to the insurance company until after the end of the coverage period.
|
CG 00 02 was developed to help the insurance industry deal with long-tail
loss development in certain types of liability claims and to enhance the claims
adjusting, actuarial, and ratemaking processes. In some cases, many years can
pass between the date that a loss occurred and the date it is reported to the
insurance company. As a result, some of the traditional statistical approaches
used in the ratemaking process are not always credible. Claims-made coverage
eliminates some of the gap in the tail and offers coverage at the time the
claim is made instead of when the loss actually occurs. This results in more
credible statistics, loss costs, rates, and more adequate premium charges.
The two coverage forms
are mostly identical. This analysis briefly addresses the areas that are
identical and more thoroughly examines the areas that are different.
Related Article:
CG 00 01 and CG 00 02–Commercial General Liability Coverage Forms Analysis
WHEN TO USE CLAIMS-MADE COVERAGE INSTEAD OF OCCURRENCE COVERAGE
CG 00 02 has not been
very popular with or well received by most commercial insureds.
While the premium charged is usually lower than the premium charged for CG 00
01, most insureds are more concerned with potential
long-tail exposures. In many cases, CG 00 02 is the coverage form of last
resort for insureds that cannot obtain coverage under
CG 00 01.
There are numerous cases
where an insured is sued for loss events that occurred 25 or more years
earlier, long after the occurrence coverage form expired. While the insured
benefits by the coverage this form provides many years after the fact, the
insurance company sustains losses it never expected and that the premium charge
did not contemplate.
An example is the
occurrence coverage form written for a comparatively small premium charge that
must respond to an asbestos claim brought for today's dollars for an incident
that occurred decades earlier. In this case, all the potential exposures
involved with asbestos were not known when coverage was written. As a result,
insurance companies are not able to recoup the huge claims and loss expenses
they incurred. CG 00 02 would have been the more appropriate coverage form for
these exposures and situations if they were known at the time and the coverage
form was available.
CONCERNS OVER REPLACING ONE COVERAGE FORM WITH ANOTHER
Extreme caution must be exercised
when replacing one of these coverage forms with the other because of the
potential gaps in coverage that can result. Both the insurance agent and the
named insured must be aware of these gaps and understand the possible
consequences.
Gaps in coverage usually
occur in one of two areas. The first is the retroactive date in every
claims-made coverage form. The other area involves the type of endorsements used
when the change takes place.
Related Court Case:
Agency and Managing General Agent Held Liable For Providing
Claims-Made Rather Than Occurrence Liability Insurance
COMPARE: ISO COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE FORMS–CG 00 01
(OCCURRENCE BASIS) TO CG 00 02 (CLAIMS-MADE BASIS)
SECTION I–COVERAGES
Coverage A–Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability
1. Insuring Agreement
- Subparagraph a. is identical in both coverage forms.
- Subparagraph b. 1. is identical in
both coverage forms.
- Subparagraph b. 2. and b. 3. and subparagraphs c., d., and e in the occurrence
coverage form address events that occur during the policy period.
- Subparagraph b. 2. and b. 3. and subparagraph c. in the claims-made coverage form
address events reported during the policy period or any extended reporting
period and that did not occur before the retroactive date and the dates
when a claim is considered made.
2. Exclusions
The bodily injury and
property damage liability exclusions are identical in both coverage forms.
Coverage B–Personal and Advertising Injury Liability
1. Insuring Agreement
- Subparagraph a. is identical in both coverage forms.
- Subparagraph b. (1) is identical in both coverage
forms.
- The rest of subparagraph b. in the occurrence
coverage form states that the loss must occur during the policy period.
- The rest of subparagraph b. in the claims-made
coverage form addresses events reported during the policy period or any
extended reporting period and that did not occur before the retroactive
date and the dates when a claim is considered made.
2. Exclusions
The personal and
advertising injury liability exclusions are identical in both forms except for
exclusion c. Material Published Prior to the Policy Period.
- The occurrence coverage form states that coverage
does not apply to personal and advertising injury that arises out of oral
or written publication of material that first took place before the policy period began.
- The claims-made coverage form states that coverage
does not apply to personal and advertising injury that arises out of oral
or written publication of material that first took place before any retroactive date on the
declarations.
Coverage C–Medical Payments
1. Insuring Agreement
This is identical in both
coverage forms.
2. Exclusions
These are identical in
both coverage forms.
SUPPLEMENTARY PAYMENTS–COVERAGES A AND B
This section is identical
in both coverage forms.
SECTION II–WHO IS AN INSURED
This section is identical
in both coverage forms.
SECTION III–LIMITS OF INSURANCE
This section is identical
in both coverage forms.
SECTION IV–COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITONS
- Condition 2. Duties in the Event of Occurrence,
Offense, Claim, or Suit:
- Subparagraph a. in the claims-made coverage form
states that notice of a notice of an occurrence or offense is not notice
of a claim. This statement is not part of the occurrence coverage form.
- Subparagraph b. in both coverage forms are
identical except for the first sentence. In the claims-made coverage form,
when a claim is received by an insured the rest of the paragraph applies.
In the occurrence form when a claim or a suit is brought against an
insured the rest of the paragraph applies.
Note: This difference is because under
the claims-made coverageform, the timing of claim
notice is what is important, not the type of claim.
- Condition 4. Other Insurance, subparagraph b. Excess
Insurance, in the claims-made coverage form has an additional provision
that is not in the occurrence coverage form. It states that this insurance
is excess over any other bodily injury or property damage insurance coverage
written on any other basis than on a claims-made basis and that is effective
before this coverage's effective date. However, this is only if either of
the following apply:
- There is no retroactive date on this policy’s
declarations
- The other insurance has a policy period that
continues after the retroactive date on the declarations
Example: Michael’s Metals’ insurance has been written on
occurrence coverage forms for the past ten years. On 01/01/13, coverage is
written on a claims-made coverage form with a retroactive date of 01/01/10.
On 03/01/13, Michael receives a claim for a loss that occurred on 06/01/12.
The 01/01/12 to 01/01/13 occurrence form is primary on this claim but the
claims-made coverage form is available as excess over it.
|
- Condition 10. Your Right to
Claim and Occurrence Information in the claims-made coverage form is not in
the occurrence coverage form. This condition details the claims-made claim
information the insurance company releases for all coverage periods, the
parties it releases the information to, and the conditions related to
release of this information.
SECTION V–EXTENDED REPORTING PERIODS
This section is in only
the claims-made coverage form. It explains the extended reporting periods and
terms available if coverage is cancelled, not renewed, or replaced by coverage
with a retroactive date later than the one on this policy. It also applies if
coverage is renewed on other than a claims-made basis. It explains how the
limits of insurance apply and how the premium is charged for the extended
reporting period.
Related Article:
CG 00 01 and CG 00 02–Commercial General Liability Coverage Forms Analysis
SECTION V–DEFINITIONS (CG 00 01) SECTION VI–DEFINITIONS (CG 00 02)
This section is identical
in both coverage forms, other than the different section number used for the
definitions in the claims-made coverage form because it includes the section on
extended reporting periods.
ADDENDUM
The following example
illustrates the differences in the way coverage triggers in the occurrence
coverage form versus the way coverage triggers in the claims-made coverage form.
Time line to trigger coverage in the occurrence
coverage form:
The claim is filed on 12/01/13 for a covered
injury loss that occurred on 07/15/12 under the occurrence coverage form
written for the period 03/01/12 to 03/01/13.
The date that the covered injury loss
occurred must be within the coverage period. However, the date the claim is
filed has no effect, other than potential statute of limitations issues in
certain jurisdictions.
Coverage inception date
|
Occurrence date
|
Coverage expiration date
|
Date claim filed
|
03/01/12
|
07/15/12
|
03/01/13
|
12/01/13
|
Time line to trigger coverage in the claims-made coverage form:
Using the same example and scenario above, coverage is denied. This is
because the claim is submitted after the policy period. This assumes there is no
extended reporting period involved.
Retroactive Date
|
Coverage inception date
|
Occurrence date
|
Coverage expiration date
|
Date claim filed
|
03/01/12
|
03/01/12
|
07/15/12
|
03/01/13
|
12/01/13
|