LIQUOR LIABILITY
COVERAGE FORMS UNDERWRITING CONSIDERATIONS
(November 2025)
Underwriting liquor liability coverage
involves evaluating risks from a distance. The actions, or inaction, of an
insured party can trigger an accident. Like all risk exposures, accidents may
or may not happen. Since underwriters do not have a direct relationship with
the individuals who cause these incidents, they cannot influence the outcome
once an accident occurs. Their primary objective is to minimize the likelihood
that the insured will engage in actions that could lead to such events.
|
|
Example: Jon
was a surgeon with a young family. One day, while he was driving to work,
Shirley struck him with her vehicle. She was 18, driving a stolen car, and
intoxicated. Red's Bar and Grill served her drinks an hour before the
accident. Red's was held legally liable for Jon’s injuries because it served
a person underage. |
The only action an
underwriter could have influenced was whether Shirley was able to get a drink
at Red’s. Once that first drink was served, Red’s became a party to the
accident according to the law and the insurance company that issued the
coverage became responsible for defending the legal action and paying damages.
One of the initial
underwriting considerations is the type of liquor license the business holds.
Neither of the liquor liability coverage forms provides coverage if the
establishment lacks the appropriate liquor license. Each state has different
rules and requirements for issuing liquor licenses, but the most common types
include:
Liquor and alcoholic
beverage manufacturers are the most removed from consumers among all businesses
in the liquor industry. As a result, their exposure to liquor liability is
lower than that of other liquor-related businesses.
A manufacturer's
primary exposure is likely to be product liability, which is covered by the
Insurance Services Office (ISO) CG 00 01 – Commercial General Liability
Coverage Form. However, it still does not include liquor liability.
Manufacturers may still face situations requiring separate liquor liability
coverage, such as the following:
Manufacturers involved
in direct sales should be classified as applicants with off-premises
consumption. The primary consideration is whether their procedures prevent or
eliminate sales to underage customers online or by mail. Simple statements like
'underage drinkers are not permitted to purchase alcohol' are not sufficient.
Will these statements withstand court challenges? Can they prevent lawsuits and
other legal actions? Manufacturers must implement responsible and credible
measures to ensure that Internet and mail order sales are restricted to adults
21 and over.
Liquor and alcoholic
beverage distributors and wholesalers have liquor liability exposures that are
generally between those of manufacturers and package stores. However, their
liquor liability exposure is usually relatively low unless, similar to manufacturers,
they engage in direct sales to customers through the following:
Direct sales to
customers or warehouse pickups are crucial to underwriting, especially when
they involve large quantities of liquor or alcoholic beverages. These customers
might be buying liquor for underage drinkers, and the distributor could be the
only source with assets to cover a significant loss.
Businesses that sell
liquor and alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption face losses mainly
because of lax or inadequate procedures for screening customers. It is best to
implement strict procedures, such as requiring customer identification for
every alcoholic beverage purchase. Underage employees should never be allowed
to ring up alcoholic beverage sales because:
The ratio of alcoholic
beverage sales to sales of all other products is significant. Establishments
with high alcoholic beverage sales ratios typically face higher risk of loss.
Businesses selling
liquor and alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption face the most
significant risk of loss. They are more accountable and held to higher
standards than other businesses because they not only monitor but also serve
their customers. These businesses must manage two key conflicts of interest.
Their profits rely on
steady sales to regular customers, but the same factors that drive sales also
increase the risk of alcohol-related incidents or losses. Therefore, it is both
challenging and crucial for these businesses to balance the risk of losing
customers by refusing service to those who are already intoxicated or about to
be, against the need to increase profits.
Underwriting businesses
like these starts with analyzing the ratio of alcoholic beverage sales to food
and non-alcoholic beverage sales. Higher alcoholic beverage sales indicate a
greater exposure to liquor liability loss. The underwriting analysis should
also assess other activities that may take place on the premises to encourage
and increase alcohol consumption. Examples include:
Each of these activities raises the risk
of loss by encouraging customers to consume more.
|
Example:
Krazees Party Towne is the city's
hottest bar. It has built its reputation by featuring excellent local bands
and entertainment that appeals to the twenty-something crowd who love to
party. One of the most popular bands is called the Wallbangerz. This dance band attracts a very lively crowd, and
Krazees’ owner tries to book them at least twice a month because of their
wild performances and successful array of gimmicks. During each set, the band
features a couple of "Banger Beats." These are songs where the
customers must order and finish a popular vodka drink when the song is played
and before it ends. The receipts at the end of the night reveal that
drink sales soar when this band plays. Needless to say, the number of
seriously inebriated customers also soars. |
On the other hand,
activities that promote eating food have the opposite effect. Food actually helps decrease the amount of alcohol consumed and
lowers the possibility of loss because it absorbs some of the alcohol and reduces
the level of intoxication and impairment.
There are ways to help
control the exposure to liquor losses. Proper training is the key to
controlling exposures. Here are some key areas underwriters consider when
assessing a risk:
·
Bartenders
should monitor the number of drinks served to each table to help prevent
overconsumption.
·
Servers
must be trained to consistently request proper identification from everyone
they serve.
·
Training
by TIPS* or similar groups is the best way to handle customers and should be
mandatory, along with establishing a clear set of procedures and adhering to
them.
·
Develop
designated driver incentives and arrangements with local taxi companies so they
are available when needed.
NOTE: TIPS is an acronym for
Training for Intervention ProcedureS. This is a training program offered
by Health Communications, Inc. Information on TIPS can be found at
www.gettips.com.
Loss of experience and
background information about the business owner is important. A key detail is
the status of its liquor license and whether it has ever been revoked or
suspended.
Related Court Case:Liquor
Liability Suit Based on Failure to Restrain Patron Did Not Circumvent Exclusion
Special events licenses
are issued for specific activities or events where alcohol is served. These
events typically last only a few days or hours, but the exposure risk may be
greater than that of a regular business operation. Usually, special events are
marked by a lack of controls or insufficient oversight, often due to the event
sponsor’s inexperience in managing alcohol-related situations. The most
important factor is control.
Loss exposures are
minimized when the sponsor arranges for and has enough people to do the
following:
Open or self-serve bars
should be prohibited. Serving and wait staff should be trained and experienced
in handling customers who consume alcoholic beverages.
Restaurants and other
establishments might not actually serve alcohol. However, they can create an
environment where alcohol consumption is not only allowed but encouraged. They
may arrange non-alcoholic setups, entertainment, and other furnishings related
to drinking. Covering this exposure is challenging because liability laws are
not always clear about when a license is required.
It is crucial to
carefully review the establishment's activities, the age of patrons, and its
hours of operation. It is also vital to determine whether the insured chooses
not to serve alcohol or is compelled to do so because their liquor license was
revoked.
ISO developed a scale
for each state that grades the level of liability it assigns to operations that
supply or sell liquor. States with lower numerical grades indicate that
establishments involved with liquor or alcoholic beverages present lower risks.
Underwriters use their company's
underwriting guidelines, state grades, and judgment to determine the
appropriate premium for a specific risk. Some insurance companies have filed
and published rates.
Licenses for special
events serving alcohol are issued for specific, limited time periods.
Therefore, a flat premium charge is usually applied instead of the standard
rating formula. This charge should be based on the type of exposure and the
state grade.
Related Article:Liquor
Liability Coverage Forms Rating Considerations
Consult the state exception pages of the ISO Commercial Lines Manual (CLM) for mandatory endorsements specific to each state.