(March 2022)
This is an analysis
of the ISO (Insurance Services Office) Homeowners Program’s Comprehensive Policy
form, 03 22 edition. Differences between it and the 05 11 edition program will
appear in bold.
Related Articles:
HO 00 03–ISO Homeowners 3 - Special Form Coverage Analysis
Note:
This article contains several discussions of earlier edition HO policy forms.
Throughout, ISO
made an editorial change. Any reference to the term “policy” has been slightly
revised to “Policy.” Likely in the hopes to restrict application of meaning to
a given, applicable insurance policy issued to a given policyholder. (03 22
Change).
Under this
provision, the insurance carrier agrees to provide homeowners insurance (as
described in the following policy pages) in exchange for the named insured
paying the policy premium AND complying with the required policy provisions.
Note: The named insured has to meet BOTH conditions in order to
qualify for coverage.
|
Examples: Larry had
faithfully paid his HO insurance premiums for 12 years when he turned in a
claim. His house was completely destroyed by a fire. The insurance company
denied his claim. Their investigation revealed that Larry burned down his own
home in order to pay off gambling debts with the insurance proceeds. Paid
premium? Yes. Complied with policy? No. Coverage? No. Mary sent in a HO insurance claim for some severe storm
damage. She sent in a perfect proof of loss with supporting documents and a
complete inventory of damaged personal property. Her insurer turned down the
claim since she let the policy lapse for nonpayment several months earlier.
Paid premium? No. Complied with policy? Yes. Coverage? No.
|
|
This
portion of the Comprehensive Form policy defines the terms that are critical to
understanding how the policy responds to coverage situations. The following is
a summary of the defined terms that, throughout the policy, appear in quotation
marks:
A. "You" and "your"
These
are used in the policy to refer to the "named insured" who appears on
the policy’s declarations. “You” and “your” also extend to the named insured's
spouse, but only if he/she lives in the same household.
"Our," "us" and
"we"
These three terms
are used as references to the company providing the homeowner policy.
B. The HO 05 Comprehensive form policy also
makes use of the following, defined terms:
1. “Aircraft Liability,” “Hovercraft Liability,” “Motor Vehicle
Liability” and “Watercraft Liability”
a. “Aircraft Liability,” “Hovercraft Liability,” “Motor Vehicle
Liability” and “Watercraft Liability” refer to legal liability for “bodily
injury” or “property damage” that is related to the use or ownership of these
items. Such liability would also encompass loss involving the following:
|
An insured permitting
another party to use a vehicle/craft (entrustment) |
Maintaining, using,
being within, operating, using, or unloading or loading a motor vehicle
when involving any person meeting the policy’s “insured” definition. (03 22
change). |
|
|
An insured's vicarious liability related to
vehicle/craft |
An insured's negligent
supervision related to vehicle/craft |
|
The specific change in B.1.a. is that the
policy now makes a distinction to restrict liability for motor vehicles to
insured parties when it is extended to any person in the earlier editions of
the form. (03 22 change).
b. The vehicle and craft definitions go further, describing the
following:
(1) Aircraft - refers to devices that are used or designed for
flight. It does not include model or hobby aircraft that is not intended
(designed) to carry people or cargo.
(2) Hovercraft - refers to vehicles that are powered by force of
cushioned air; naturally, such devices have motors. They must also be designed
to travel over the ground, at ground level. This means a self-propelled
motorized ground effect vehicle and includes, but is not limited to, Flarecraft
(brand of air-cushion device) and other air-cushion vehicles; and
Related Court Case: “Aircraft
Definition Held Not to Include a Parachute”
(4) Motor Vehicle – refers to separate definition that appears
later in this section.
2. "Bodily injury"
This term refers to
sickness, disease, or bodily harm, and includes any resultant death. Further,
both the cost of care required by and any loss of services caused by any of
these conditions also qualify as bodily injury.
Related Court Case: Emotional Distress Held Not to Be Bodily Injury
3. "Business"
a. “Business” refers to a trade, occupation, or profession, EVEN
when such activity occurs only on a part-time or occasional basis
b., c. The policy
now extends this definition specifically to mineral rights at any insured
location that an insured formally leases and situations that qualify as
Home-sharing host activities. (03 22 Change).
d. The policy’s definition does exclude the following instances
from its business definition:
·
Activities that only reimburse volunteers for
expenses that are directly related to the activity
·
An insured who provides home day care to his or
her relatives
Related Court Case: Babysitting Activity Held Subject to Liability Exclusion for Business
·
Mutual exchanges of home day care services
The policy’s
“business” definition also makes an exception for activities that involve
modest amounts of income. Specifically, an activity is not considered to be a
business if it generates no more than $5,000 (up from $2,000 - 03 22 Change)
in compensation during the 12-month period before the homeowner policy period.
Note: The business definition refers to the value of compensation,
NOT merely cash. So, the details surrounding an activity may substantially affect
how a given activity is treated.
|
Example:
Janie is an active photographer and sometimes she is asked to take photos.
Sometimes she receives payment or takes photos in exchange for items or
services. She is concerned about her coverage should her hobby be involved in
a loss. She meets with her agent and asks the following: ·
If her hobby compensation exceeds $5,000 in
any 12 months before a policy period, does it retain its status as a business
forever? ·
Does the reference to total income include
“non-monetary” compensation? ·
Does the reference to total compensation take
gross or net receipts into consideration? ·
Is the reference to total compensation in the
12 months before the inception date affected by the basis of collecting
income? Her
agent shares that, frankly, these issues may likely only be addressed when a
loss occurs. He tells Janie to track any compensation and they may have to
discuss adding an endorsement or buying separate coverage. |
4. Cannabis is a
defined term. It refers to:
a.
Consumable items that contain any measurable amount of either natural or
synthetic THC (Tetrahydrocannabinol) or cannabinoid. Essentially, items that
include chemicals derived from cannabis that are capable of creating a feeling
of euphoria.
b. Examples of items referenced in part 4.a. include:
(1) plants or their parts that belong to the Cannabis L. family.
Flowers, roots, seeds, stalks, and stems of such plants are included in the
definition.
(2) The cannabis definition is even broader than what appears in 4.a. and b (1)
above. The term refers to mixtures and items derived from such plants or
chemicals (waxes, resins, oils, hash, hemp or even included in infusions and
edibles) including marijuana. (03 22 Change).
5. “Employee”
This term refers to
a person whose duties involve tasks that are NOT performed by a “residence
employee” AND who either:
6. Home-sharing host
activities
This term refers to the following:
a. Making use of a covered residence, in whole or in part, available to persons
when the transaction is facilitated by any especially designed platform. The
transactions may involve paying a fee for the property’s use (renting) or other
exchanges of value.
|
Example: Jarla has rented a bedroom
from The Kellys for two weeks. She’s paid them a fee that covers the rent as
well as to reimburse them for the use of a printer and stands. Besides
attending an arts festival, Jarla is also an exhibitor and she is finishing
up some pieces to be displayed at the fest. This all qualifies as a
home-sharing host activity. |
7.
Home-sharing network platform
a.
Refers to, essentially, any digital medium created both for making residential
space and related property available for use by other parties.
b. the
property use agreement (transaction) may be completed (rental fee payment,
exchange of services or similar form of compensation) via the medium. It may
include a website, phone application, community (network), etc. (03 22 Change).
8.
Home-sharing occupant
a., b.
This term applies to the party or parties who contractually agreed to make use
of an insured’s residential and related property. The contract has to have been
made via a method that meets the policy’s definition of a home-sharing network.
Persons who occupy or use the property, along with the party(ies) that directly
participated in the contract, also qualify as home-sharing occupants. (03 22
Change).
|
Example: Harlen asks Frieda, his long-term companion, to go on a month-long
vacation. Harlen uses a smart phone application to lease Thander’s spacious Arizona
home. Neither Harlon nor Frieda have ever visited a desert climate. While
only Harlen is on the short-term lease, Frieda also would be treated as a
home-sharing occupant under Thander’s policy. |
|
9. The Comprehensive Form homeowner
policy contains a multi-part definition of persons who qualify as insureds and
there are a number of exceptions.
a. The term initially refers to:
|
Example: Henry’s 4,700 square foot
home is insured with a Comprehensive Form homeowner policy. While visiting a
friend, they decide to play tennis. During intense play right at the net,
Henry swings at a line drive and smashes his friend’s wrist, breaking it. The
friend claims that Henry did it on purpose to win the game and he sues. Henry,
the named insured, would be covered under his policy. |
|
(Meaning relatives who live at the insured
location with the named insured)
Note:
Such persons must BOTH be younger than 21 AND have a named insured, his or her
spouse or a relative of the named insured/spouse as their caregiver.
b.
The definition of insured includes persons who are residents of the named
insured’s household who are full-time students. In order for a full-time
student to qualify as an insured, he or she must either be younger than 24
years of age and be related to an insured OR be younger than 21 years of age
and be in the care of someone in the named insured’s household.
c. The following persons are insureds,
but ONLY regarding section II, the liability portion of the homeowner policy:
|
Example:
Lynn is a very busy freelance artist who works from her home. She hires
Cameron, a local dogwalker, to handle duties for “Blaze,” Lynn’s Husky.
During a walk, a bicyclist passes Cameron and Blaze, the dog lunges at the
cyclist who is bitten as well as injured by being knocked of his bike. The
biker sues Cameron. Cameron would be treated as an insured under Lynn’s HO
policy. |
However,
anyone in possession of an insured’s watercraft or animal is denied insured
status if any business purpose is involved.
Related
Court Case: “Automobile Exclusion Held Not Applicable to Liability
Arising from Vehicle in Dead Storage”
The
Comprehensive Form policy’s definition of insured continues. It also states
that, whenever the word “insured” immediately follows the word “an,” the phrase
refers to one or more “insureds.” In other words, an “insured” means one or
more persons who have covered status under the policy.
10. “Insured location”
This
term refers to a variety of circumstances that includes the following:
|
Example: Richie’s home is covered by
a Comprehensive form policy. The lot next door, which Richie also owns,
contains a large garage. Unfortunately, since that lot was never listed on
the policy, it does not qualify as an insured location. |
|
Note: The building has to be for the
insured’s residence. Land where an insured is building a residence that he
plans to rent to another party would not be an insured location.
Other
situations that qualify as an insured location include:
-
An insured’s individual or family cemetery plots
or burial vaults
-
Part of a premises which is rented and used by
an insured but only if for non-business purposes
11. “Motor vehicle”
A
motor vehicle is a vehicle that is self-propelled, runs on land or on water
(amphibious 03 22 change), and includes any trailer that is towed or
carried by such a vehicle. All of the following would qualify as motor
vehicles:
|
cars |
trucks |
vans |
recreational
vehicles |
certain golf carts |
|
motorcycles |
mopeds |
all-terrain cycles |
all-terrain
vehicles |
snowmobiles |
|
sports utility vehicles |
motorized carts |
self-propelled mowers |
lawn tractors |
motorized bikes, scooters, and similar vehicles |
|
Any of the above items that are designed as amphibious
(capable of operating on land, water- including underwater), also qualify as
motor vehicles. (03 22 Change). |
||||
Any
vehicle or amphibian that is motorized and self-propelled is considered
to be a motor vehicle. Both of these elements must be present.
Related
Court Case: “ATV Injury Not Covered by Homeowners Policy”
Items
such as sleds, non-motorized carts, bikes, and similar property do not qualify
as motor vehicles.
12. “Occurrence”
This
term refers to an accident and also to repeated exposure to similar conditions.
However, in order for the accident or repeated exposure to be considered an
occurrence it must cause "bodily injury" or "property
damage" and that BI or PD must take place during the policy period.
Related
Court Case: Negligent Misrepresentation Not "Occurrence"
13. "Property damage"
This
term refers to direct damage to tangible property (including its destruction)
or the direct or indirect damage caused by the loss of use of tangible
property.
Note:
What is meant by property damage may face changes in light of the Covid19
pandemic.
14. "Residence employee”
Refers
to a person hired directly by a person who, by definition, is considered to be
an insured. It also applies to a person an insured hires to work for him or her
via a contract with a firm that leases workers. In either case, the worker’s
duties have to be related to maintaining or using the insured premises.
Note: A person, who performs such
duties for an insured, but at a different location, also qualifies as a
residence employee as long as that work is not connected to an insured’s
business.
|
Example: Greta decides to help her
good friend Paul. Paul was trying to finish a room renovation in time to
welcome his new baby. Greta loans Paul her full-time handyman to help him for
a few days. During the days he is assisting Paul, the handyman still
qualifies as a residence employee under Greta’s policy. |
15. “Residence Premises"
Refers
to any of the following that are used mainly for family residential purposes:
HOWEVER,
any of the above must be listed on the policy declarations of the residence
premises.
Related
Court Case: "Insured Premises" Exclusion Held Not Applicable
to Claim Based on Negligence - Not Premises Liability
C.
With regard to the HO 05 Comprehensive Form Policy, there is a special
consideration.
Persons who are deemed to be home-sharing occupants (as defined in the
policy) are NOT occupants such as boarders, guests, roomers, or tenants. (03 22
Change). Their status is restricted
and totally dependent on their residing on covered property due to a
home-sharing agreement.
This coverage
section protects the following types of property:
·
The residence that appears on the declarations
page
·
Any structures that are attached to the
described residence
·
Any materials or supplies that are located
either next to or on the residence premises.
However, any
material or supplies have to be for the purpose of adding to, altering, or
repairing the residence or other structures described on the declarations.
|
|
Example:
Pamela is renovating a home that is covered by a Comprehensive form
policy. She is installing ironwork that requires use of a blowtorch and puts
the torch down as she leaves for lunch. The torch falls over, onto carpeting.
Because the torch’s tip is still extremely hot, the carpet catches fire and
the room is quickly engulfed. The drywall and lumber that are being stored in
the room is destroyed. Even though it was not yet part of the home, the
building material was intended to be part of the house; therefore, it
qualifies for coverage. |
Note:
Remember that the residence should be a one- to four-family dwelling in order
to qualify for homeowner coverage. Also, be aware that land, even land on which
covered property sits, is NOT covered by the Comprehensive form policy.
|
Example: A very wet spring leaves the
ground completely soaked. The insured has a large, old, Chinese Elm in his
side yard. Due to the soaked ground and the lack of root support, the Elm
falls over and lands upon a large shed. It destroys the shed and leaves a
gaping hole in the lawn. While the shed is covered, the damage to the lawn
(caused by the tree) is not. |
|
Care should be taken when insuring a dwelling
to determine the proper replacement cost of the dwelling itself (minus any land
value). Sometimes the lot upon which the dwelling is built may be more valuable
than the dwelling. In these circumstances, the home's market value is
substantially influenced by its land value. The market value of such a home
becomes a factor that should be discounted when determining the insurable value
of the home.
1.
Other structures on the "residence premises" are protected under this
coverage part. An “other structure” is, literally, a structure that is other
than the primary residence premises. Therefore, besides having some other use,
an “other” structure must also exist separately from the primary residence. In
other words, an “other” structure cannot be attached by any significant means
to a primary residence. The policy states that, in order to qualify as an
“other” structure, the structure has to clearly sit apart from the dwelling. If
the structure is connected to the dwelling by anything more substantial than a
utility line or a fence, it will be considered as part of the dwelling.
|
Example:
Greta Cargo’s cottage home is covered by a Comprehensive form policy with the
following limits: |
|
|
Coverage Part |
Insurance Limit |
|
A |
$180,000 |
|
B |
$18,000 |
|
C |
$90,000 |
|
D |
$54,000 |
|
Greta loves her cottage home (including a
small, built-in garage) as well as her deluxe, lattice gazebo (worth nearly
$18,000) that sits 25 feet behind her home. Greta enjoys having breakfast in
the gazebo but hates that she has to dress before walking between the gazebo
and the house. Greta hires a local carpenter who builds two walls that are
attached from her cottage’s back door to the front panel of the gazebo. Now
Greta may travel back and forth between the structures in complete privacy.
However, the gazebo is now part of the dwelling and not a separate structure.
The financial consequence is that, instead of having the entire Coverage B
limit available to cover the gazebo, the Coverage A limit has to cover the
cottage and the gazebo together. |
|
Besides gazebos, other examples of structures
covered under Coverage B are:
2.
Situations that are NOT covered
As it is with Coverage A, the insurance under
Coverage B does not apply to land, including the land upon which the other
structure sits.
The wording regarding uncovered situations states
that no coverage is available for other structures:
Related Court Case: “Damaged Property
Used in Farming Excluded”
There are a couple of important exceptions to
these exclusions. First, the policy will cover a rental to a person who is not
an insured under the policy IF the structure is used only as a private garage.
Another exception is granted when the garage
is used to store business property (EXCEPT FOR GAS OR FUEL) that is owned by an
insured or by a tenant who lives on the residence premises. The prohibition for
fuel does not apply to fuel that’s in a vehicle’s fuel tank.
|
Example:
Glenn lost his garage in a fire. He is worried about his insurance coverage.
At the time of the fire, the garage was filled with thousands of dollars’
worth of P.A. equipment. He owned the property and used it in his business as
a local sound engineer. He gets good news and bad news. While he is relieved
to find that the garage is covered, the destroyed business property is NOT
eligible for protection. |
3.
The limit of insurance for Coverage B is restricted. The maximum amount of
coverage available is ten percent of the applicable dwelling’s insurance Limit.
The Coverage B limit is an additional amount of insurance protection. Payment
under Coverage B DOES NOT affect the amount of Coverage available under
Coverage A.
1.
Covered Property
Personal property owned by or used by an
“insured” is covered anywhere in the world.
Personal property owned by others can be
covered but only if the insured asks that it be covered and either of the
following applies:
|
Example: Clara Sweethart’s home
suffers a kitchen fire during a weekend when her son has invited several of
his college friends over. The friends’ luggage and clothing are ruined by
soot and smoke. Clara’s claim for damages includes the loss of the luggage
and clothing since she feels responsible to her guests. |
|
2.
Limit for Property at Other Locations
a.
Other Residences
There is a special limitation for personal
property that is usually located away from the insured’s primary residence.
Under this circumstance, either the greater of 10% of the Coverage C insurance
limit or $1,500 applies. (The dollar amount under the previous HO
Edition was $1,000). (03 22 Change).
Are there any exceptions to this special
limitation for property that’s typically located away from the residence premises?
Yes. The limitation DOES NOT apply in either of the following situations:
·
During the first 30 days after an insured
acquires a new principal residence and starts to move their belongings to the
new residence,
·
Personal belongings that have been moved from a
residence that is not fit to house the property because the residence is being renovated
repaired or remodeled after being damaged in a covered loss.
This limitation of 10% is not applicable for
the first thirty days from the time an insured begins to actually move personal
property to a new residence. The limitation is meant to provide a modest amount
of coverage to personal property that is never a part of the property that is
kept at the insured dwelling. The coverage amount is kept at a minimum so that
a single homeowner policy is not used to cover significant personal property
exposures that exist for more than one location.
The limitation encourages property owners to
buy additional, separate insurance to cover such situations. However, the policy
language also wants to preserve full coverage in certain instances such as when
the personal property is moved to either a temporary location or to a new,
permanent location. Neither instance significantly increases the overall
exposure for which insurers initially accept and assign premiums.
b. Self-Storage
Facilities
There is a limitation under the Comprehensive
form policy for personal property that is kept in a self-storage facility. The
property must either be owned or used by an “insured.” The limit is the greater
of $1,500 (increased from $1,000 in the previous HO Program edition - 03 22
Change) or 10% of the amount written under Coverage C.
|
Example: |
Property that is in storage because the
insured dwelling is being repaired, renovated, or rebuilt and, because of this
activity, the dwelling is not suitable for containing the property is not
subject to this limitation. In such cases, the full Coverage C limit is available.
In order to prevent a compounding of limitations, stored property that is usually
located away from the insured’s primary residence is not subject to this
limitation because it would be subject to the Other Residence limitation in
item a. above.
This coverage was introduced under the ISO
Homeowners Program 05 11 Edition. It is a substantial reduction of coverage.
Earlier editions did not include a limitation so the entire, applicable,
Coverage C limit would have been available.
The Comprehensive form includes a number of
classes of personal property that have specific monetary limitations. You
should notice that the categories involve different classes or property that,
due to their nature, are highly susceptible to loss or destruction. These limitations
are sub-limits that do not increase
the personal property insurance amount that appears on the policy declarations.
This
sub-limit increased from the 05 11 edition amount of $200. It applies to
the following:
|
money |
bank
notes |
bullion |
|
gold
other than goldware |
silver
other than silverware |
platinum
other than platinumware |
|
coins
and medals |
scrip |
stored
value and smart cards |
This
sub-limit increased from the 05 11 edition amount of $1,500:
·
securities
·
accounts
·
deeds
·
evidences of debt
·
letters of credit
·
notes other than banknotes
·
manuscripts
·
personal records
·
passports
·
tickets and stamps.
Note: This limit applies to valuable papers no matter the medium in
which they exist (i.e., paper or electronically). This modest limit includes
the cost to research, replace or restore the information from the lost or
damaged material.
This
sub-limit increased from the 05 11 edition amount of $1,500:
·
watercraft of all types, including their
trailers, furnishings, equipment, and outboard engines or motors
This
sub-limit increased from the 05 11 edition amount of $1,500. It applies to:
·
trailers or semi-trailers not used with
watercraft of all types
Related court Case: “Camp Trailer
Held Subject to Special Limits for Trailers”
This
sub-limit increased from the 05 11 edition amount of $1,500. The limited
coverage applies to jewelry, watches, furs, precious stones, and semi-precious
stones that are stolen. Loss of such property caused by other eligible perils
would not be subject to this limitation.
This
sub-limit is changed in the 03 22 edition of the ISO Homeowners Program, from
$2,500. (03 22 Change)
This
sub-limit applies to the following:
·
loss by theft of firearms and related equipment
This sub-limit would include property such
as:
·
ammunition
·
weapon loaders
·
scopes
·
gun locks
·
gun safes
·
miscellaneous firearm accessories including
parts
This
sub-limit is changed in the 03 22 edition of the ISO Homeowners Program, from
$2,500. (03 22 Change).
This
sub-limit applies to the following property, but only with it involves theft
loss:
·
silverware
·
silver-plated ware
·
goldware
·
gold-plated ware
·
pewterware
·
platinumware
Note:
This includes flatware, hollow-ware, tea sets, trays, and trophies made of or
including silver, gold, pewter, or platinum.
This
sub-limit is changed in the 03 22 edition of the ISO Homeowners Program, from
$2,500. (03 22 Change).
This
sub-limit applies to the following:
·
property, on the "residence premises,"
used primarily for "business" purposes
Note:
This limitation only involves property that is used PRIMARILY for any business
purpose.
This
sub-limit applies to the following:
·
property, away from the "residence
premises," used primarily for "business" purposes
In order for this sublimit to apply, the
“business” use has to be primary. In other words, the fact that a piece of
property may, occasionally, be used in business will not make it subject to
this limitation. However, if the property involves electronic apparatus, this
limitation is inapplicable IF such property is used with audio or video
equipment that is located in or on a motor vehicle. These items are subject to
limitations in items j. and k. below.
This
sub-limit affects portable electronic equipment:
·
loss to electronic equipment that is portable,
while in or upon a “motor vehicle,” but only if the electronic apparatus can be
powered from the vehicle’s electrical system. The equipment must transmit, receive,
or reproduce audio, data, or visual signals. Accessories are no longer subject
to this limitation. Instead, they are subject to item k. below.
Note:
A given electronic item must be portable and can have multiple power sources as
long as one possible source is the motor vehicle.
This
item was introduced in the 05 11 edition. The coverage was increased in the 03 22 edition from a
sub-limit of $250. (03 22 change).
This is a specific limitation of coverage for items closely
related to portable electronics referenced in item j. above.
·
loss to tapes, records, disks, media, wires, and
antennas which are:
- in or on a motor vehicle, and
- used with equipment that must transmit, receive,
or reproduce audio, data, or visual signals.
Note:
The above sub-limits apply to the ENTIRE CLASS of property referenced.
|
Example: Wendy came back to her car
after a wonderful, very long dinner with friends. She was dismayed to see
that her car windows were smashed in and all of the car’s contents were
stolen, including more than $800 in gaming components. When she turns in a
claim for that property under her HO policy, she’s saddened further to find
that only $250 of that part of the loss is eligible for coverage. |
|
This
sub-limit is introduced with the 03 22 edition of the ISO Homeowners Program.
(03 22 Change).
·
loss to aircraft that are deemed to be either a
model or hobby type that are incapable of carrying property or persons.
Note:
The above sub-limits apply to the ENTIRE CLASS of property referenced.
Related Article: Personal Articles
Floater
Related Article: Personal Articles Floater
Under Coverage C- Personal Property, there
are eleven categories of property that are excluded from coverage. The
excluded classes of property include:
a. Any
property that is separately described and specifically insured in this or other
insurance.
This exclusion is meant to prevent insureds
from collecting twice for the same loss. This applies regardless of the amount
of coverage provided by any other source of insurance. Besides discouraging
“double-dipping,” this should encourage insureds to insure property under a
policy that is the most appropriate.
b.
Animals, birds, or fish
While homeowner programs offer liability for
animals owned by insureds, they have not offered livestock or animal mortality
coverage.
|
Example: The Smith family was wakened
by a serious storm. Hurriedly, the family rushed into their fortified
basement. When the storm blew over, they found their house completely
flattened. Sadly, they also discovered their family pets. The animal loss is
not eligible for coverage. |
c.
Motor vehicles
This
item has been slightly revised under the 03 22 edition.
The reference to motor vehicles applies to
related equipment, and parts, but such parts have to be located within or on
a motor vehicle. (03 22 change). The following are exceptions to this
exclusion:
(1)
Portable electronic audio, visual and data devices but only if they can be powered
by a source that is NOT a motor vehicle’s electrical system.
Note: The exclusion of property that is
powered exclusively by the motor vehicle is intended to eliminate coverage for
equipment that should be covered more appropriately elsewhere such as under an
auto policy which generally provides more complete coverage for permanently
installed electronic apparatus. Although the exception is positive be aware
that the items covered are subject to the sublimits 3.j. and 3.k. described
above.
(2) This exclusion has another
important exception. There is coverage for certain motor vehicles. The
homeowner policy covers motor vehicles which are not subject to motor vehicle
registration and meet one of the following criteria:
·
Have the single purpose of servicing an
"insured's" residence.
|
Example: A golf cart modified to
carry lawn and garden supplies. |
·
Designed to assist the handicapped.
|
Example: Motorized wheelchair |
The Comprehensive form policy states that the
above exceptions to the motor vehicle exclusion apply only for vehicles used to
service a residence premises and that vehicles for handicapped persons be designed
to assist the handicapped. However, it’s uncertain whether this language
tweaking will have any practical effect.
One reason for such precise language is to
try to avoid gaps or overlaps between auto and home policies.
Related Court Case: Motorized Vehicle Exclusion Applies to Riding Mower Injury
d.
Aircraft
The policy defines aircraft as any
contrivance that is used or designed for flight. This property exclusion does
not apply to hobby or model aircraft that is not designed or used to carry
people or cargo.
Note:
This section of the Comprehensive Form policy may become more important and may
face changes with the proliferation of drone ownership and use.
|
|
|
Example: Henry is an avid model plane
hobbyist. He has expanded his collection and owns a small drone. It is
powerful enough to lift items weighing up to 5 pounds. He has been known to
pick up and deliver items and transport them among many homes in his
neighborhood. The drone is NOT eligible for coverage when it is lost during a
home burglary. |
e.
Hovercraft and parts.
This exclusion is for any self-propelled
motorized ground effect vehicle, and includes Flare craft, air cushioned and
similar vehicles.
f.
This item was revised and reformatted in the 03 22 edition. The policy’s
protection does not extend to property that belongs to:
(1)
persons occupying the covered residence under instances that meet the
definition of a home-sharing agreement
(2)
Other persons who, while not directly involved in a home-sharing agreement, are
using the premises because of instances that qualify as home-sharing activities
(3)
This portion of the exclusion applies to property that is owned by boarders,
roomers and/or tenants. There is an exception for such property owned by such
persons who are an insured’s relatives. (03 22 Change).
There is an exception for such property that
belongs to an insured’s relatives. The purpose of this exclusion is to make
sure that the homeowner policy is not used to cover persons who should buy
their own tenant’s or homeowners insurance.
g.
Property that
(1) is located in any residential space which is actually rented to or that is
regularly reserved for use of a person that is defined as a “home-sharing
occupant.”
(2) furnishes an apartment regularly rented or held for rental to other persons
and that activity is performed by an "insured"
(This
item was revised and reformatted - 03 22 Change).
Property covered under the Landlord
Furnishings in Additional Coverages is an exception.
The policy’s intent is to restrict coverage
to protect property that is used by the insured instead of giving full coverage
to property that is used by other persons such as renters. This exclusion
dovetails with the protection found under Additional Coverages, Landlord’s
Furnishings.
h. Any
property that is possessed in order to facilitate its use under contracts to
share the space when transacted via, essentially, smart phone applications or
network platforms. (New defined term – 03 22 Change).
i.
Property that is either rented or held for rental to others but only while off
the "residence premises."
j.
"Business" data
The data can be stored in any of the
following:
·
Books of account, drawings, or other paper
records
·
Computers and related equipment
The policy refers to computers and related
equipment instead of the obsolete reference to electronic data processing,
tapes, wires, records, discs, and other software media.
|
Example: You have an insured who
takes home the only accounting records from his business and stores them on
his personal computer. When all the information on his computer is wiped out
during an electrical storm, there is no coverage available for the
restoration of his business data. |
Related Article: ISO Valuable Papers
Coverage Form
The cost of blank recording or storage media
and of pre-recorded computer programs available on the retail market is
covered.
k.
Credit cards, electronic fund transfer cards or access devices used to
withdraw, deposit or transfer funds.
This
item no longer makes a reference to former, additional coverage that provided a
modest amount of protection for such value cards. (03 22 Change).
l.
Water or steam.
The intent of this exclusion appears to
prevent coverage of the expense of water utility service from the policy.
Related Court Case: Pool Collapse
Damage Not Covered
|
Example:
The Jonkuls are away at a state park for most of a day. They return to find
that the hot water supply line to their kitchen faucet had burst and sprayed
water for hours. Their next water bill is more than double its normal amount.
That expense is not eligible for insurance reimbursement. |
Coverage is not granted for electronic or
computer-generated, currency, including cryptocurrency and it applies regardless
how the various currencies are named. (Defined term, newly added - 03 22 Change.)
Note: Digital currency refers to fiat
(government-backed and issued) currency, such as digital U.S. dollars, digital
euro, etc. Cryptocurrency is privately owned electronic money that is encrypted
and protected via blockchain technology.
n.
A variety of products and substances are deemed ineligible property. The
exclusion applies to the following:
(1)
Controlled Substances - refers to items, including chemicals, mixtures and
compounds that are described under the U.S. Federal Food and Drug Law.
(2)
Cannabis even when not categorized as a controlled substance (such as various
narcotic drugs)
However,
exclusion n does not apply to items (3) or n (4) below.
(3)
Prescriptions Drugs – medicines acquired via a licensed health care
professional and which are used according to applicable directions (dosage,
frequency, and circumstances, such as with or after a meal).
(4)
Hemp Derived Goods and Products
Coverage
still applies to items made from or which contains hemp (which does not contain
hallucinatory effects). Clothing, food, seeds, extracts, oils, lotions, materials,
and paper are examples. However, the exception is removed (exclusion is
applied) if their use violates local or state laws, codes, regulations, etc.
(Defined term, newly added - 03 22 Change)
This portion of the Comprehensive form policy
provides coverage for Additional Living Expenses, Fair Rental Value and Civil
Authority. The insurance limit that appears for Coverage D is the total amount
that applies to all three coverages. Specifically, Coverage D provides:
1.
Additional Living Expenses
If a covered loss makes the insured premises
unusable, this coverage pays an insured’s expenses which are beyond his or her
normal living expenses.
Note:
The extra expenses must involve the cost of maintaining an insured’s normal way
of life such as renting hotel or motel rooms, laundry service, eating out or
even gas expense if it can be attributed to being created by an insured loss.
a., b. Besides the insured, this coverage
is extended to persons related to the insured who also lived in the insured’s
home. Other eligible persons are those who younger than 21 that live in the
insured’s home. However, these youths must be cared for by residents who share
the insured’s living space and qualify as that insured’s relatives. (03 22
Change).
A time limit controls the payment of these
expenses. Payment will last until the damaged property is repaired or replaced,
or until the household has found a new, permanent residence, whichever
occurs first. This part of the additional coverage was slightly edited,
likely in an attempt for more clarity. (03 22 Change)
Related Court Case: Additional
Living Expenses Held Not Recoverable Following Contamination
2.
Fair Rental Value
This coverage pays an insured the fair rental
value of the part of the "residence premises" which the insured rents
out or holds for rental. Any payment is reduced by any expenses which cease
while the residence can’t be used.
Of course, the home must first be made
unavailable or unlivable by a covered cause of loss.
Payment
under additional living expenses or fair rental value will be for the shortest of the time required to repair
or replace the damage to property. This part of the additional
coverage was slightly edited, likely in an attempt for more clarity. (03 22
Change).
3.
Civil Authority Prohibits Use
If a civil authority prohibits the "residence
premises" from being used as a result of direct damage to neighboring
premises by a covered cause of loss, the additional living expense and fair
rental value loss as provided under additional living expenses and fair rental
value is covered for a maximum of two weeks.
|
Example: Kimmy’s neighbor’s home is
raided by the police because it was being used as a meth lab. The police
arrange to have the home decontaminated. Because the process is dangerous,
the police orders Kimmy’s family to live elsewhere for a couple of weeks. While
that is the same coverage period provided by the Comprehensive Form policy,
no coverage is available. The reason for the move is not a situation that
qualifies for coverage. |
The coverage periods extended under
additional living expenses, fair rental value, and civil authority are not
limited by the expiration date of the policy.
4.
Loss or Expense Not Covered
There is no coverage available due to the
cancellation of a lease or an agreement.
|
Example: A windstorm fells a tree
against Laura’s home, which caves
in a large section of wall. It is a spacious, ranch-style home and she rents
out a master bedroom. The renter finds a new apartment because of delays in
repairs. Laura can’t make a claim for her loss of three months’ rent. |
The
policy language advises that the ending of a given policy period does not
affect the application of these coverages under a given loss.
Section I of the Comprehensive
form policy provides several coverages in addition to coverage parts A through
D.
Note: Unless otherwise stated, the coverage amounts that appear in
this section are unchanged from the previous editions of the Comprehensive form
Policy.
1. Debris Removal
a. Reasonable expenses will be paid for the
removal of the following:
·
Debris of covered property if an insured peril
that applies to the damaged property causes the loss
|
|
Example:
Chuck’s home caught fire and the responding fire department tossed a lot of
their smoke and fire-damaged furnishings onto Chuck’s front yard to make sure
that the fire threat was extinguished. The costs to remove the furnishings
from the yard qualify for coverage under his policy. |
·
Ash, dust, or particles from a volcanic eruption
but only if they caused direct loss to a building or to property that is within
a building.
This coverage is a part of the limit of
insurance that applies to the damaged property. If the sum of the amount paid
for actual property damage and the debris removal exceeds the limit of
liability for the damaged property, an additional 5% of that limit of liability
is available for debris removal expense.
·
The named insured’s trees which are destroyed by
windstorm or hail
·
The named insured’s trees which are destroyed by
weight of ice or snow
·
Trees belonging to an insured’s neighbor which
are blown over or around by an insured peril under Coverage C
However, the trees must cause one or more of
the following:
- Damage a covered structure
- Block a driveway enough to prevent
registered motor vehicles from entering or leaving the premises
- Block a ramp or passage that eliminates a
handicapped person’s access to the dwelling.
Note:
The limit for any one loss is $1,500 for any one tree but only $3,000 for
all fallen trees (increased from previous limits of $500 and $3,000
respectively). (03 22 Change). While the increased coverage helps, it
would still be quite inadequate at a site where debris consists of a large
number of felled trees. Though the coverage amount is modest, it still offers
some protection to events that are commonplace, so it should be a valued
feature.
2. Reasonable Repairs
If covered property is damaged by a covered
peril, this additional coverage will pay the reasonable cost an insured incurs for protecting the property from
additional damage. Coverage includes reimbursement for repairing other damaged
property. Remember, in order to qualify for this additional coverage, the
expenses must involve covered property that is damaged by an eligible cause of
loss. This coverage does NOT increase the limit of insurance that applies to
the covered property AND the insured is still obligated to protect the property
from further damage per other policy conditions.
|
Example:
Buying and installing tarpaulins to cover a roof that was breached by a
felled tree limb. |
3. Trees, Shrubs and Other Plants
Specific perils are covered for trees,
shrubs, plants, or lawns on the “residence premises.” These perils are:
·
Fire or lightning
·
Explosion
·
Riot
·
Civil commotion
·
Aircraft
·
Vehicles not owned or operated by residents the
insured household
·
Vandalism
·
Malicious mischief
·
Theft
For all trees, shrubs, plants, or lawns,
coverage is available for up to 5%
of the limit of liability that applies to the dwelling.
No
more than $1,500 (increased from previous limit of $500 - 03 22 Change) of
this limit will be available for any one tree, shrub, or plant. However, this
is an ADDITIONAL amount of insurance. Payment under this additional coverage
does not affect the insurance limits that apply to other covered property.
Additionally, it is important to remember that there is NO coverage for
property grown for "business" purposes. This form now makes
specific reference to property grown as part of business activity or cannabis.
Neither class of property is eligible for coverage. (03 22 Change).
Related Court Case: Trees and
Shrubbery Damaged by Hurricane Were Not Covered
4. Fire Department Service Charge
This coverage pays up to a maximum of $500
for an insured who has a contract or agreement to pay a fire department a
service charge when the fire department is called to save or protect covered
property from a covered peril. However, the property MUST be located beyond the
limits of the city, municipality or protection district furnishing the fire
department response.
This is considered to be additional insurance and no deductible
applies to this coverage.
Related Article: Fire Department
Service Charges
5. Property Removed
If covered property is being removed from
premises that are endangered by a covered peril, the property moved is covered
for any direct damage for a maximum of 30 days. This additional coverage does
not affect the insurance limit that applies to the covered property. However,
it does provide temporary protection that is much broader than the normal
policy coverage.
Note: Many sources of damage are
excluded by the Comprehensive form policy; however, during a maximum 30-day
window during which endangered property has been removed, coverage applies to
ANY source of DIRECT damage, such as transportation perils.
Previous editions of the ISO HO Special
Form Policy used to have an Additional Coverage called “Credit Card, Electronic
Fund Transfer Card or Access Device, Forgery, and Counterfeit Money.” This item
was deleted. (03 22 Change).
6. Loss Assessment
a. The insurance company will pay up to $2,000
for “your” share of a loss assessment charged during the policy period against
you by a corporation or association of property owners (increased from
previous limit of $1,000). (03 22 Change.) The assessment has to be due to
a direct loss to property that is collectively owned by all members. Further,
the loss that triggers the assessment has to be caused by a covered peril under
Coverage A Dwelling.
Ineligible
Assessments - This additional coverage excludes protection against loss due
to earthquake and also due to any land shock waves or tremors occurring occur
before, during or after a volcanic eruption.
b.
No coverage is available for assessments made against an insured or a
corporation or association of property owners by any governmental body.
|
Example: Randi lives in Airy Acres, an
exclusive development. She receives a letter saying that she, along with all
of the other homeowners in Acres, is being assessed $950. Two weeks earlier,
the area experienced earthquake tremors. It turns out that the lining of the development’s
in-ground pool was cracked by the activity. The association’s property policy
does not cover the loss, so the assessment was made. Randi sends in her share
to the association and then files a claim to her insurer. She’s in no mood to
go swimming when she learns that the assessment doesn’t qualify for reimbursement
since it was excluded. |
This coverage applies only to loss
assessments charged against “you” as owner or tenant of the "residence
premises."
Regardless of the number of assessments, $2,000 is the
maximum amount that will be paid for a single occurrence. This insurance is
subject to the policy deductible that appears on the declaration page. However,
regardless of the number of eligible assessments in a single occurrence, the
deductible only applies once.
c.
Section I Condition Q. Policy Period does not apply to this coverage which
means that the loss that causes the assessment is not required to occur during
the policy period.
7. Collapse
This
protection applies to items eligible under Coverage A and Coverage B. This provision is one that has long caused
confusion. It’s length is likely due to the ongoing difficulty in providing a
clear explanation of coverage intent.
a.
The provision opens with a statement that coverage is only meant to respond to
loss involving abrupt collapse. Since the form is making this distinction, it
may have made more sense to title this item - 8. Abrupt Collapse.
b.
The Comprehensive form policy includes an explanation of what is meant by
collapse. Collapse is explained as an abrupt falling down of an entire building
or part of a building. The collapse has to be severe enough to make the
building or part of the building unusable for residential purposes.
c.
Neither a building nor a building part that is in danger of collapsing NOR a
part of a building which remains standing is considered as being in a state of
collapse. The nonexistence of a collapse condition applies even when the
remaining structure shows evidence of cracking, bulging, and sagging, bending,
leaning, settling, shrinking, or expanding.
|
Example: Claude has lived in his home
for 8 years and, during that time, it has been insured with a Comprehensive
Form HO policy. He notices that large cracks have appeared in the floor of
his home’s attached garage. He contacts his insurance agent about making a
claim. His agent gives him the bad news that, as the cracks are due to
settling, it would not be covered by his policy. |
|
d.
This additional coverage protects against tangible damage to covered property from
the total or partial collapse of a building caused only by one or more of the
following:
(1)
Perils insured against in the Comprehensive Form’s Coverage A and Coverage B
(2)
Hidden decay, however, if an insured has knowledge of decay, resultant collapse
loss is disqualified from coverage
|
Example: Jared was incensed that the
insurer that provided his Comprehensive Form HO policy had sent a letter
turning down his claim. His home had more than $7,000 in damages from the
collapse of a staircase and a wall. The letter included the insurer’s
justification. Jared had revealed to the insurer that he knew the area
underneath the stairs was damaged by an ongoing plumbing leak that he never
had repaired. |
|
(3)
Unseen insect or vermin damage
Note: Under
items (2) and (3), coverage is barred if any insured is aware of such damage
before a collapse occurs.
(4)
Weight, whether consisting of contents, equipment, animals, or people
(5)
Weight of accumulated rooftop rainwater
(6)
Use of poor-quality material or improper methods for construction, remodeling,
or renovation. However, any resultant collapse has to occur in the midst of
such activity.
e.
If property such as awnings, bulkhead, cesspools, decks, dock, drains, fence,
flues, foundation, patio, pavement, pier, retaining wall, septic tank, swimming
pool, underground pipe or wharf suffers a collapse loss because of the sources
specifically listed under items (2) through (6) above, no coverage applies. An
exception is granted for such when it is because of the direct total or partial
building collapse.
f. This coverage does not affect the
amount of listed coverage applicable to any given class of covered property.
Related
Court Cases:
“Collapse Held Covered Only According to its Popular Meaning”
“Insect Damage Not Collapse Unless Total”
8. Glass or Safety Glazing Material
a.
This additional coverage pays for any of the following:
·
Glass or safety glazing material breakage but
only if it is part of a covered building, storm door or storm window
·
Glass or safety glazing material breakage but
only if it is part of a building, storm door or storm window AND the direct
cause of loss is earth movement
·
Covered property that suffers direct damage from
glass or glazing material that breaks out of storm doors/windows or other parts
of the covered building
b.
This coverage does not include loss on the "residence premises" if
the dwelling has been vacant for more than 60 consecutive days immediately
before the loss. However, if the vacant building is damaged by earth movement,
coverage does apply. There is an important exception. A dwelling being
constructed is not considered vacant. Vacant status is also inapplicable to
homes that are not actively occupied because of remodeling, renovations, or
repairs. (03 22 Change).
Further, this provision does not cover loss
that results from the openings that exist after glass or glazing material has
broken. This wording merely prevents duplicate coverage with protection that
may exist under other parts of the policy.
c.
This coverage grants a maximum of $200 of protection (increased from
previous limit of $100.) (03 22 Change).
d.
This coverage does not increase the limit of insurance that applies to the
damaged property.
9. Landlord's Furnishings
The Comprehensive Form Policy protects
against damage to a landlord’s furnishings that is caused by the perils shown
under Coverage C - Personal Property unless the loss is due to theft.
A maximum of $3,000 per apartment is
available to protect the insured’s property that is located in areas of the
residence premises that are rented (or are available for rental) to other
persons. This additional coverage part also states that the $3,000 per
apartment limit is the maximum that can be recovered, regardless of the number
of appliances, carpeting or household furnishings that are damaged or destroyed
in a single loss.
(Increased from previous limit of $2,500 -
03 22 Change.)
Note:
This wording appears to address the situation of premises suffering a loss to
more than one area that is either rented or available for rent. It acts to
control this loss exposure. However, this coverage part could be found to be
ambiguous since the term, apartment, is not defined.
The damage to a landlord’s furnishings must
be caused by these perils:
a.
Fire or lightning
Related Article: Dwelling Policy Program
Perils
b.
Windstorm or hail
What
Windstorm or Hail Does Not Include
Windstorm or hail does not include loss to
property contained in a building when the loss is caused by rain, snow, sleet,
sand, or dust. This is the case unless the direct force of wind or hail damages
the building, causing an opening in a roof or wall and the rain, snow, sleet,
sand, or dust enters through this opening. Note that a closed window or door is
considered part of a structure’s wall. While blowing a door open is not
“creating an opening,” blowing a door off its hinges would qualify as “creating
an opening.”
Coverage
Restriction for Windstorm or Hail
This peril includes loss to watercraft of all
types and their trailers, furnishings, equipment, and outboard engines or
motors, but only while those items are inside a fully enclosed building.
Related Article: Dwelling Policy
Program Perils
c.
Explosion
This protection includes both internal and
external explosions.
Related Article: Dwelling Policy
Program Perils
d.
Riot or civil commotion
In other words, this is basically vandalism
coverage involving large crowds. Note that the reason for the riot or commotion
is unimportant.
e.
Aircraft, including self-propelled missiles and spacecraft
This peril will likely see new developments
with emerging risk of drones. Losses involving personal use of drones typically
have to do with invasion of privacy or accidental injuries.
f.
Vehicles
g.
Smoke
The policy only covers for smoke losses that
are both accidental and sudden, but bars coverage for loss that is due to smoke
from industrial operations as well as agricultural smudging.
Eligible smoke damage includes a situation
called “puffback.” Puffback is when a furnace, boiler or similar equipment
releases soot, smoke, vapors, or fumes onto the covered property and causes
damage.
Related Court Case: Pollution
Exclusion Held Applicable to Cigarette Smoke
h.
Vandalism or malicious mischief
|
Stephanie’s home is insured under a
Comprehensive Form HO policy. She rents out part of her home that was
converted to a small apartment which includes a sleeping area, bath, and a
small kitchen. Her tenant reports a loss that affected much of the
apartment’s furnishings owned by Stephanie. It turns out that the tenant’s
ex-boyfriend, upset over being dumped, broke into the apartment, and slashed
its upholstered items and broke tables and a countertop range. The Landlord
Furnishings provision should cover part of the loss. |
Related Court Case: Insurer Had to
Pay for Clean-Up Costs – Has an interesting twist on interpreting this peril.
i.
Falling Objects
The peril of falling objects does not include
loss to property contained in a building unless the roof or an outside wall of
the building is first damaged by a falling object. Any damage to the falling
object itself is not included.
Related Court Case: Temporary
Removal of Shingles from Roof to Make Repairs Did Not Affect Coverage
j.
Weight of ice, snow or sleet that causes damage to property contained in a
building.
This coverage is for personal property, not
for building damage. If a heavy accumulation of snow caused a section of a roof
to fall in and, miraculously, didn’t damage any personal property, no coverage
(under this section) is granted for the loss.
k.
Accidental discharge or overflow of water or steam from within a plumbing,
heating, air conditioning, or automatic fire protective sprinkler system or
from within a household appliance.
This
long-winded peril does not include loss to the system or appliance from which
the water or steam escaped. There is no coverage when the discharge or overflow
is caused by or results from freezing except as provided by this Additional
Coverage’s freezing peril. No coverage is available for damage on the
"residence premises" caused by accidental discharge or overflow which
occurs off the "residence premises." Finally, this peril excludes
damage from mold, wet rot, or fungus UNLESS such damage is hidden by walls, floors,
or ceilings of a covered structure.
This
peril is clarified further with the notation that none of the following is
considered to be a plumbing system or a household appliance:
·
Sumps
·
Sump pump or related equipment
·
Roof drains
·
Gutters
·
Downspouts or similar fixtures or equipment.
l. Sudden
and accidental tearing apart, cracking, burning, or bulging of a steam or hot
water heating system, an air conditioning or automatic fire protective
sprinkler system, or an appliance for heating water.
As with the accidental discharge or overflow of water or steam
peril, there is no coverage for loss due to freezing. For instance, if a home’s
steam heating system burst and no longer provided heat throughout the home, an
additional, independent loss could be created by other parts of the covered
property becoming subject to freezing temperatures. This peril merely excludes
coverage from this event.
m.
Freezing of a plumbing, heating, air conditioning, or automatic fire protective
sprinkler system or of a household appliance
In order for protection to apply to freezing loss, this peril
requires that an insured either takes care to maintain heat in the building or
must shut off the water supply and drain applicable appliances of water.
However, the water supply and adequate heat MUST be available if the home has a
protective sprinkler system. Ironically, the requirement to maintain water
supply and heat for a sprinkler system would prevent an insurer from denying a
loss to an appliance that freezes up and causes personal property damage.
|
Example: The Fieldstones come back
from their three-week ski vacation and find a mess in their home. During
their time away, their area experienced extended sub-zero weather. A water
supply pipe for their sprinkler system froze, burst, and flooded their home.
Fortunately, the damage to their home is covered under their Comprehensive
Form HO policy. |
|
n.
Sudden and accidental damage from artificially generated electrical current.
This
very broad peril is modified so that it doesn’t apply to certain items that are
commonly damaged, but can be easily protected, from this peril. It also does
not protect against routine replacement of items that can get “blown out” by a
power surge. Tubes, transistors electronic components or circuitry that are a part
of any of the following are specifically not covered for damage that would
otherwise be covered under this peril:
·
Appliances
·
Fixtures
·
Computers
·
Home entertainment units
·
Other types of apparatus
o.
Volcanic eruption other than loss caused by earthquake, land shock waves or
tremors.
101.
Ordinance or Law
a.
This coverage feature allows an insured to use a maximum of 10% of the Coverage
A limit to pay for increased replacement or repair costs that are caused by a
law or ordinance. The law or ordinance has to be the type that controls any of
the following:
·
Covered property that is damaged by a covered
cause of loss and which has to be constructed, demolished, remodeled, renovated,
or repaired
·
Destroying and rebuilding an undamaged part of
covered property when a law or ordinance requires its demolition because
another part of the covered property was damaged by a covered peril
·
Renovating and removing or remodeling an
undamaged part of covered property when a law or ordinance requires such action
because similar work must be performed on another part of the covered property
which was damaged by a covered peril
In other words, if a covered residence is
damaged or destroyed, the policy provides up to 10% of the Coverage A insurance
limit which deals with the increased loss costs created by local laws to handle
the manner in which damaged or destroyed real property is rebuilt or replaced.
|
Example: The top floor of Ned’s home
is demolished by straight line winds. He receives a reminder notice of a
local ordinance. Because more than 45% of his home was damaged, all of the
home’s plumbing must be replaced with PVC pipes. This adds $11,000 to the
cost of his repairs. Ned’s home is insured for $175,000, so he has up to
$17,500 to help with this substantial, added cost. |
b.
Part or all of this coverage may be used by an insured to pay for the increased
cost to remove debris created while constructing, demolishing, renovating,
remodeling, repairing, or replacing property described in 11a.
c.
This coverage does not include the following:
·
Any decreased value of covered property that is
created by the ordinance or law
·
Any costs required of an insured for handling, testing,
and/or monitoring pollutants (as is described in the policy) related to a loss
to covered property or which occurs at the covered location.
This coverage is an additional amount of
insurance, so payment under this provision does NOT affect the amount of
coverage that appears under Coverage A - Dwelling.
11.
Grave Markers
This coverage option permits an insured to
use up to $5,000 to pay for a headstone or mausoleum that is damaged by any of
the perils that qualify under Coverage C - Personal Property. The coverage
applies to such property, whether it is on or away from the insured premises.
However, any payment under this coverage part reduces the amount available
under the Coverage Part that responds to a given loss.
The insurer’s obligation under these coverage
parts is to protect eligible property for any source of direct loss. This means
that indirect loss does not qualify for coverage under Coverages A, B and C.
This portion of the policy goes on to list
sources of loss that are excluded. Specifically, no coverage is provided for:
1.
Causes of loss that are listed under Section I - Exclusions.
Note:
The excluded sources are ordinance or law, earth movement, water, power
failure, neglect, war, nuclear hazard, intentional loss, and governmental
action. There is also no coverage for various concurrent causation events.
2.
Loss involving any of the following:
a.
Loss caused by freezing of a plumbing, heating, air conditioning, or automatic
fire protective sprinkler system or of a household appliance, or by discharge, leakage,
or overflow from within the system or appliance caused by freezing.
However, there is coverage if the insured
takes the time to do either of the following:
·
Keep the building heated
·
Shut off the systems’ or appliances’ water
supply and drain the system/appliance.
Language also states that, if the building
has an automatic fire sprinkling system, the system must remain active and the
property must be heated so that it doesn’t interrupt the sprinkling system’s
operation.
This exclusion also specifies that sumps,
sump pumps or related equipment, roof drain, gutter, downspout or similar
fixtures or equipment are not considered to be plumbing systems or household
appliances. Therefore, freezing losses related to such equipment or drainage
systems are NOT subject to this exclusion.
b. Loss caused by cold weather conditions such as freezing,
thawing, pressure or weight of water or ice, whether driven by wind or not, to
any for the following:
(1)
Fence, pavement, patio deck, swimming pool
(2)
Footing, foundation, and other structures or devices that support a building or
structure
(3)
Retaining wall or bulkhead which does not support a building or structure
(4)
Pier, wharf, or dock.
This exclusion clarifies that such property is
constantly exposed and particularly vulnerable to loss from freezing, so they
are not eligible for coverage. Providing protection to such property against
freezing conditions and the pressures of wintry conditions would be akin to a
maintenance contract rather than an insurance policy. Property such as patios,
pools, wharves, and fences are virtually certain to be worn down and damaged by
cold weather conditions. The homeowners policy is intended to cover accidental
events, not virtual certainties.
c. Any
thefts
(1) No coverage exists when it involves
property theft related to any use of a covered residence that qualifies as
under the policy’s definition of a home sharing host activity. (03 22 Change).
(2) No coverage is available for property theft
that occurs in a dwelling or to a dwelling during the time that dwelling is
being constructed, including theft of materials or supplies intended for that
dwelling’s construction.
Once the dwelling is finished AND is occupied
(as a residence), this exclusion becomes inapplicable.
Note:
Under part 2. of Coverage A, there is insurance for building materials;
however, such coverage does not include THEFT protection.
Building materials and supplies are VERY
attractive targets for theft. This exclusion forces other parties (insureds and
building contractors) to:
·
take precautions to safeguard such property,
·
deliver and incorporate material as needed, or
·
seek specific coverage for the exposure (such as
endorsing additional coverage or buying a builder’s risk policy)
If either party decides to store such
materials on the insured premises, they also have to handle the risk of it
being stolen.
d.
There is no coverage for any of the following:
·
Mold
·
Fungus
·
Wet rot
But the policy does make an important
exception. The policy WILL provide coverage for mold, fungus, or wet rot if the
damage is hidden in the home’s walls, ceilings, or floors. However, the hidden
damage has to be due to the accidental discharge or overflow of water or steam
from a plumbing or air conditioning system, a household appliance, or a fire
sprinkler system. Coverage for hidden damage from accidental discharge and
overflow also exists when caused by several sources located away from the residence
premises, such as storm drains, water pipes, steam pipes, or sewer lines.
This exclusion also specifies that sumps,
sump pumps or related equipment, roof drain, gutter, downspout or similar
fixtures or equipment are not considered to be plumbing systems or household
appliances. Therefore, hidden rot or decay losses related to such equipment or
drainage systems do not qualify for coverage.
e. All of the following are also barred from
coverage under the Comprehensive form policy:
(1)
Wear and tear, marring, deterioration
|
Example: An insured turns in a claim
for his garage door which, a day earlier, suddenly slammed down on the ground
and is damaged beyond repair. Investigation of the loss found that the 15-year-old
garage door spring had suddenly broken and the door fell with the loss of
support. The damage resulting from the aged steel spring breaking is not
covered. |
(2)
Inherent vice, latent defect, mechanical breakdown (this refers to ANY quality
or characteristic found in property that causes it to damage or destroy itself)
(3) Smog, rust or other corrosion, or dry rot
Note: Dry
rot does not have the exception that applies to wet rot in item 1.d. above.
(4)
Smoke from agricultural smudging or industrial operations
|
Example: Klara and her neighbors live
next to a factory owned by Sausalita Sally Inc. She turns in a claim after
she spends $1,110 to have the outside of her home power washed. The damage
was due to the smoke from Sausalita’s operations. The factory has been
repeatedly cited for using inadequate filters for its factory exhausts.
Klara’s Comprehensive form policy will not cover this loss. |
|
(5)
Discharge, dispersal, seepage, migration, release, or escape of pollutants.
However, the pollution damage IS COVERED if it is caused by one of the eligible
perils insured against under Coverage C - Personal Property. Pollutants are
described as any solid, liquid, gaseous, or thermal irritant or contaminant,
including smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, chemicals, and waste.
Waste includes materials to be recycled, reconditioned, or reclaimed.
The difficulty with this exclusion is that it
can be applied very liberally. An insured will find it hard to make a claim for
a loss involving common substances found in homes that are classified as
pollutants, if the loss was not triggered by the sources of loss named under
Coverage C, such as fire, wind, or explosion.
Related Court Case: Pollution Exclusion Held Applicable to Damage Caused by Sealant Fumes
(6)
Settling, shrinking, bulging, or expansion, including resultant cracking, of
pavements, patios, foundations, walls, floors, roofs, or ceilings; footings
(the part of the foundation that sits directly upon earth) and bulkheads (a
retaining structure of wood, steel or reinforced concrete that protects a shore
or harbor).
Related Court Case: “No Structural Damage--HO "Collapse" Coverage Denied”
(7)
Birds, rodents, or insects
(8)
Animal activity related to nesting, infestation, secretions and waste discharge
or release.
(9)
Animals owned or kept by an "insured."
Exception
to 2.e.
This paragraph explains that the dwelling,
other structures, and personal property are all covered for damage caused by
the accidental discharge or overflow of water or steam from the following:
·
A storm drain, water pipe, steam pipe or sewer
pipe that is located away from the residence premises
·
A plumbing, heating, air conditioning or fire
sprinkler system or household appliance on the residence premises.
Coverage includes the expense of tearing out
and replacing any necessary part of the covered structure when the action is
needed to repair the system or appliance.
It is IMPORTANT to note that coverage for
demolishing and replacing property is available ONLY when water or steam has
actually damaged the property.
The Comprehensive form Policy does not
protect damage to the source of the escaped water or steam. Further, under this
provision, a sump, sump pump, roof drain, gutter, down spout, or similar
property is NOT considered to be a plumbing system or a household appliance.
Exclusion A.3. that is provided in the
section called Section I – Exclusions, does not apply to any water loss that IS
covered under items d. and e. within this Section I – Perils Insured Against
section.
Finally, this section states that it will
cover ensuing losses from items excluded in 2.a.- 2.e. that are not PRECLUDED
by any other policy provision. While “preclude” has a common definition that
makes it a synonym of “exclude” or “except,” it is not commonly used. Adding
this term along with the many references to exclusions and exceptions may make
it even more difficult for this statement to be easily understood by insureds.
This is especially so considering that the term “preclude” is making its debut
in the same paragraph that contains “ensuing,” another term that confuses
insurance purchasers.
It is very important to note that items
excluded in 1. in this Section I – Perils Insurance Against Section are not
subject to this exception. This follows with the anti-concurrent nature of
those exclusions.
Related Article: Concurrent Causation
and Anti-Concurrent Causation Clauses–A Discussion
This portion of the policy goes on to list
sources of loss that are excluded. Specifically,
no coverage is provided for loss caused by or involving:
1.
Vandalism and malicious mischief.
a. No coverage exists when it involves vandalism
or similar loss related to any use of a covered residence that qualifies under
the policy’s definition of a home sharing host activity. (03 22 Change).
b. This exclusion takes effect if the
insured premises is vacant for 60 days before the loss. Further, the exclusion
bars coverage for losses that ensue when caused by intentional and wrongful
acts committed during vandalism or malicious mischief.
“Vacant”
does not apply to homes that are under construction (including projects
involving remodeling, renovation or repairing).
|
Example: Kelly has a Comprehensive
form policy which runs from 8/1/21 to 8/1/22. On March 1, she moves to |
2. Collapse
No protection exists for this source of loss,
EXCEPT for the detailed description of coverage for collapse that is found in
the policy’s Additional Coverage Section (please refer above to item E.8. under
Section I-Property Coverages). The exclusion wording makes another, reference
to what is meant by collapse and it restates precisely the situations that are
ineligible for coverage.
This portion of the policy goes on to list
sources of loss that are excluded. Specifically, no coverage is provided for:
1. Broken fragile items such as (but not
exclusive to) bric-a-brac, eyeglasses, glassware, marble, porcelains, or
statuary.
The exclusion does NOT apply when the broken
items involve bronzes, cameras, jewelry, photographic lenses, or watches.
Further, protection is granted when such breakage is due to:
a. Fire or lightning, windstorm, or hail
Related Article: Dwelling Policy
Program Perils
b. Smoke
The policy only covers for smoke losses that
are both accidental and sudden, but bars coverage for loss that is due to smoke
from industrial operations as well as agricultural smudging.
c. Explosion, riot, or civil commotion
Note that the reason for the explosion, riot
or commotion is unimportant.
d. Aircraft, vehicles, vandalism, and malicious mischief
e. Either total or partial building collapse
f. Water, but only when due to circumstances that are NOT excluded under
other parts of this policy.
g. Theft (including theft attempts)
h. Sudden and accidental tearing apart, cracking, burning, or bulging of a
steam or hot water heating system, an air conditioning or automatic fire
protective sprinkler system, or an appliance for heating water.
2. Damage related to temperature or atmospheric extremes.
An exception exists. Coverage is provided
when damage to covered property is directly due to the action of hail, rain, sleet,
or snow.
3. Damage in the course of property refinishing, repairs, or renovation –
but doesn’t apply when this activity involves furs, jewelry, or watches
4. Damage to watercraft that collides, sinks, swamps or is stranded
This exclusion applies to the watercraft and its
trailer, equipment, motors/engines, and furnishings.
The exception to this exclusion is when the
collision is with a land vehicle.
5. Damage due to any person, group, organization or government unit’s
actions or decisions, including failing to act.
However, an exception exists for damage for
ensuing loss as long as the policy does not, elsewhere, exclude that source of
loss.
|
Example: An insured turns in a claim
for flood damage to his home’s major appliances and furniture. He later
explains that he had hours to move the property away from the flood but a
manager at the area’s only truck rental refused to rent a truck when he
shared that he planned to enter the neighborhood threatened by imminent
flooding. The insurance company denies the loss because flood is an excluded
loss. |
6. No coverage exists when it involves
vandalism or similar loss related to any use of a covered residence that
qualifies under the policy’s definition of a home-sharing host activity. (03 22
Change).
There is no insurance protection for either
direct or indirect loss that is due to any of the sources of loss that appear
in this policy section. The loss is excluded:
·
regardless of any other cause or event
contributing concurrently or in any sequence to the loss, and
·
regardless of whether the damage is localized or
widespread.
Another feature meant to clarify the
exclusions is the mention that several sources of loss are excluded regardless
of whether it is connected to human, animal or natural (force of nature)
activity. This addition appears to be the type that, rather than make a point clearer,
may result in creating new angles of attack for parties seeking coverage
loopholes. For instance, would a loss that occurred because of some mechanical
or computer-related error be interpreted as a human cause of loss?
A.
Under this part, the exclusions apply to all parts of the Comprehensive form
policy. Specifically, there is no coverage for:
1.
Ordinance or Law
This exclusion refers to any loss or expense
created by the enforcement of any ordinance or law regulating the construction,
repair, or demolition of a building or other structure, regardless whether a
physical loss takes place.
However, this exclusion does not apply to the
coverage granted under Additional Coverage 11. Ordinance or Law.
Related Court Case: Pollution
Exclusion Held Applicable to Damage Caused by Sealant Fumes
Besides construction-related costs, the
exclusion also applies to any loss in property value or to any pollution-related
loss (including expense associated with monitoring, testing, or remediation of polluting
events).
2.
Earth Movement
Earth movement is defined as an earthquake
and includes land shock waves or tremors that occur before, during or after a
volcanic eruption; landslide; mine subsidence; mudflow; earth sinking, rising,
or shifting. This source of loss is excluded regardless of whether it is
connected to human, animal or natural (force of nature) activity.
There is an important element of this
exclusion which may still result in coverage+. IF a fire, theft, or explosion
occurs after any earth movement, the policy will pay for the damage caused by
the subsequent loss. However, any damage resulting from earth movement would be
excluded from any payment made to care for theft, explosion, or fire damage.
Note: Such
events are often referred to as ensuing losses.
3.
Water
The Comprehensive form policy does not cover
a loss caused by any of the following:
a.
Flood, surface water, waves, tidal water, overflow of a body of water, or spray
from any of these, whether or not driven by wind.
b.
Water which backs up through sewers or drains or which overflows from a sump.
c.
Water below the surface of the ground, including water which exerts pressure on
or seeps or leaks through a building, sidewalk, driveway, foundation, swimming
pool, or other structure.
d.
The excluded situations mentioned under in items a. b. and c. above also apply to
damage caused by waterborne material. So, a distinction exists between damage
caused by water and damage caused by items borne (carried) by water. The
reference, allegedly, is intended make the exclusion definitive in barring
coverage for damage caused by debris-laden water or sewage. This exclusion
applies regardless of whether it is connected to human, animal or natural
(force of nature) activity.
|
Example: A stream near Courtney’s
house floods after a week of steady rain. The side wall of her shed is caved
in by a large tree trunk that was carried by flooding water. Courtney files a
claim for both the water and trunk-related damage. Her insurer denies the
entire claim, explaining that they consider all of the loss to be due to
flooding. |
Besides
excluding damage from water and waterborne material, this exclusion also bars
coverage from water (and material carried by water) that escapes or overflows
from any containment system. The systems referenced in the form include:
·
Dams
·
Levees
·
Seawalls
·
Other
boundaries
·
Other
containment systems
The exclusion applies to all property that is
referenced under the policy’s personal property section (Coverage C) while it
is on any premises controlled by a named insured (whether the control is via
ownership, possession, rental, occupied, etc.). Further, the exclusion is not
affected by the fact that a given loss was, on any level, due to weather
conditions. A narrow exception exists for such property that is not located on
any premises controlled by a named insured.
|
Example: James used to be an avid
outdoors enthusiast but has given it up. A friend has just discovered the joy
of the outdoors and James lends her several thousand dollars’ worth of
equipment for her to use for a camping adventure. The friend’s campsite is
destroyed during a flashflood and all of the equipment is lost. James is
upset, but later is buoyed when he finds that, although the loss involved
flooding, the property is eligible for coverage under his Comprehensive Form
HO policy. |
Direct
loss by fire, explosion or theft resulting from water damage is covered.
Related Court Case: “Anti-Concurrent Causation Exclusion Upheld in Katrina Flood Loss”
4.
Power Failure
This exclusion involves losses caused by a
failure of power or other utility service. However, the failure has to take
place off the "residence premises." If a covered cause of loss (such
as fire) occurs on the "residence premises," after the excluded power
failure, the policy will pay only for that ensuing loss.
5.
Neglect
This exclusion bars coverage for any failure
on the "insured’s" part to use all reasonable means to save and
preserve property at and after the time of a loss. This exclusion fits
perfectly with the intent of insurance to cover losses that are accidents or,
in other words, which are beyond the control of the policyholder. It is logical
to exclude payment for losses that could have been prevented by an insured
taking care to protect his or her property. Remember, though, that the
exclusion is for failure to take ordinary, rather than heroic, measures.
6. War
War is
considered to include any of the following and any consequence of any of the
following:
|
war |
undeclared war |
civil war |
warlike act by military force or personnel |
|
rebellion |
revolution |
insurrection |
destruction, seizure or use for a military
purpose |
Even
if a nuclear event is completely accidental, discharge of a nuclear weapon will
be treated as a warlike act.
7.
Nuclear Hazard
This exclusion consists of the event as
defined and to the degree explained in the nuclear hazard clause of SECTION
I—CONDITIONS.
8.
Intentional Loss
This exclusion refers to any loss that is due to any intentional act of any insured covered
by the Comprehensive form policy. An intentional act includes any act that is
meant to create a loss. Any conspiracy to commit such an act also qualifies as
an intentional act. The exclusion applies even to innocent insureds (insureds
who do not participate in an intentional act, including its planning). Adding
the reference to innocent insureds is a response to decisions in various
jurisdictions that obligated insurers to settle certain intentional losses.
Related Court Case: Accidental
Injury from Deliberate Act Covered
9.
Governmental Action
The policy does not allow coverage for
property that is described in Coverage parts A - Dwelling, B - Other Structures
and C - Personal Property, which is destroyed or seized under the orders of any
government unit or public authority. There is a very important exception
connected to this exclusion. If the government action or order is related to a
fire or the prevention of the spread of fire, any loss caused by the fire IS
eligible for coverage.
B. The
Comprehensive Form Policy bars protection to the property described under
Coverages A and B for the sources of loss listed below.
While excluding several additional sources of
loss, this section grants an important exception. The Comprehensive form policy
states that ensuing losses may be covered if they are not PRECLUDED by any other policy provision. According to Webster’s
Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary, preclude is defined as something to prevent
the presence, existence, or occurrence of; make impossible or to exclude or
debar from something.
Related article: Concurrent Causation
and Anti-concurrent Causation Clauses-A Discussion
The Comprehensive form policy does not
provide coverage for:
1.
Weather conditions
This exclusion only applies if weather
conditions contribute in any way with a cause or event excluded under Section
I—Exclusions, Paragraph A. The lead-in language that applies to the following 9
exclusions explains that direct and indirect loss is not covered. Loss is
excluded regardless of any other cause or event contributing concurrently or in
any sequence to the loss.
2.
Acts or decisions
The acts or decisions exclusion includes the
failure to act or decide on the part of any person, group, organization, or
governmental body.
3. Faulty, inadequate, or defective
This
includes planning, zoning, development, surveying, siting, design,
specifications, workmanship, repair, construction, renovation, remodeling,
grading, compaction materials used in repair, construction, renovation or
remodeling, or maintenance of part or all of any property whether on or off the
"residence premises.”
Such
losses are barred from coverage whether they occur on or off the premises.
Regardless of the number of people who have
an insurable interest in the property covered, the insurance company providing
the comprehensive form HO coverage is limited in its response. It won’t pay an
"insured" more than the amount of that "insured's" interest
applying at the time of loss. It also will pay no more than the limit of
liability for the covered property.
Specifically, the Comprehensive form policy
is only obligated to pay the policy limit that applies to a covered person who
has suffered a loss to covered property.
This section merely says that the insurer
will pay the portion of an eligible loss that exceeds the applicable deductible
and that payment is subject to the given limit of insurance.
When, in a given situation, more than a
single deductible applies to a loss; the insurer will only use the highest,
applicable deductible.
This provision also states that this item may
be pre-empted by specific deductible language that applies to other coverage
parts.
This provision reinforces
an insured’s prime obligation to strictly comply with its requirements. It
mentions that if an insured fails to perform the duties, and if that failure
adversely affects the insurer, the insurer is no longer obligated to provide
coverage. An insured's cooperation is critical to an insurance company's
ability to perform under the insurance contract.
Related Court Case: Uncooperative Insured Can’t Seek Arbitration
In case of a loss to covered property, the
named insured, the insured seeking coverage, or a representative of either
party is responsible for:
1.
Giving prompt notice to the insurance company or the insurance company’s
agent.
Related
Court Cases:
Notice to Broker Was Not Notice to Insurance Company
Notice to Independent Agent or Broker Held Not to Be Notice to Insurer
2.
Notifying the proper authorities in case of loss by theft.
3.
Protecting the property from further damage
If repairs to the property are necessary, the
insured is required to:
If a homeowner kept materials or supplies on
hand to help protect the covered property from loss, the policy should also
protect such property if it were stolen or destroyed by a listed or eligible
cause of loss.
|
Example: The Barkersons’ home was
vulnerable to loss when, during a thunderstorm, the roof was breached by a
fallen tree. The Barkersons hired a handyman neighbor to make some temporary
repairs and to cover the hole in the roof. The neighbor bought the necessary
supplies and made the repairs. Later, after receiving the neighbor’s repair
bill for $2,700, the insurer advised the Barkersons that, as the bill had
absolutely no details regarding materials, costs, or labor, it would only pay
$900 for the work. The insurer based its offer after inspecting the repair
job and making an estimate based on local material and labor costs. |
|
5.
Cooperate with the insurance company in the investigation of a claim.
This item acts as an important reminder that
the insured must be an active and willing participant in the claims process.
Related Court Case:
Breach Of "Cooperation" Condition by
Insureds Held to Warrant Insurer's Denial of Burglary Claim
6.
Prepare an inventory of damaged personal property.
The inventory must show the quantity,
description, actual cash value and amount of loss. The “insured” should also
attach any bills, receipts and related documents that will justify the figures
reported in the inventory.
|
Example: Berny’s claim for a large
fire loss is denied by his insurer. After several requests from his insurer
to provide more information on this lost personal property, Berny refuses to
share more than what he did immediately after the loss, sending a video of
his possessions. It did not include any other documentation such as date of
purchase, individual purchase costs or receipts. Berny merely claimed that
his loss should be valued at $52,000. |
This condition is unchanged from earlier
editions of the Comprehensive form policy.
Related Article: Actual Cash Value
Guide
7. As
often as is required by the insurance company, the insured must do all of the
following:
a.
Show the damaged property.
b.
Provide the insurance company with the records and documents that they request
and allow them to make copies.
c.
Submit to and sign an examination while under oath and without being in the
presence of any other "insured.”
This condition may appear to be heavy-handed,
but the insurer is in the vulnerable position of having to rely on the insured
concerning the scope of the loss. The insurer is merely asserting its chances
of getting accurate information for investigating a claim. Unfortunately, this
condition often becomes a battleground between insurers and claimants. The
interests of insureds may have been better served if this condition contained
some wording that obligated an insurer to exercise courtesy and reasonableness
when enforcing this provision.
8. The
named insured must send to the insurance company, within 60 days after its
request, a signed, sworn proof of loss which to the best of the named
insured’s knowledge describes the following:
a.
The time and cause of loss
b.
The interest of all "insureds" and all others in the applicable property,
including all available information on any property liens
c.
Other insurance which may cover the loss
d.
Information concerning any status changes affecting the property’s legal
ownership (title) or occupancy that took place during the policy term
e.
Any details on the damaged buildings regarding repair estimates and
specifications
f.
The inventory of damaged personal property described in an earlier part of this
section
g.
Additional living expense receipts and other information that can document a
loss involving fair rental value
Section
C., Duties After Loss, no longer contains references of obligations involving
credit card, electronic fund transfer card or access device companies. (03 22
Change).
Any mention of replacement or repair cost
does NOT include any expense created by any ordinance or law. The only
exception is the coverage described under Additional Coverage E.10. Ordinance
or Law. In light of this clarification, covered property losses are settled in
the following manner:
1. The
following types of property are paid at actual cash value at the time of loss
but not more than the amount required to repair or replace:
a.
Personal property
b.
Awnings, carpeting, household appliances, outdoor antennas, and outdoor
equipment. The exclusion is not affected if such property is attached to
structures.
c.
Structures that are not buildings (such as permanently installed playsets)
d.
Grave markers and mausoleums.
Actual cash value is generally considered to
be today’s replacement cost of the item minus depreciation.
|
Example: Jenny’s
house is destroyed in a tornado. As part of her settlement, she receives $50
for the loss of her refrigerator/freezer. She thinks this amount is unfair
and she provides documentation on that model’s current value. Her insurer
agrees and sends her another $300 for that part of her loss. |
2.
Dwellings and other structures are covered at replacement cost without
deduction for depreciation. However, any payment would be conditional upon the
following:
a.
At the time of loss, if the amount of insurance in this policy on the damaged
building is 80% or more of the full replacement cost of the building
immediately before the loss, the insurance company will pay the cost to repair
or replace, after application of deductible and without deduction for
depreciation. In no case will the insurance company pay more than the least of
the following:
(1)
The limit of liability under this policy that applies to the building
(2)
The replacement cost of the portion of the damaged building, based on the
building’s function and use of similar materials
(3)
The amount sufficient to either repair or replace the damaged building
Under this section, it does not matter if the
covered property is rebuilt at a new location. Such a move would be considered
inconsequential to the operation of the policy settlement. The payment under
the policy would be limited to the maximum eligible cost that would exist if
damaged property were rebuilt at its original location. The additional cost
would belong to the policyholder.
b.
The relationship of the amount of coverage carried on a damaged building to
that building’s full replacement cost is critical. When a loss occurs, if the
insurance limit is less than 80% of the building’s full replacement cost
(before the loss), the insurance company isn’t obligated to pay more than the
limit of insurance under the policy; further, the insurer is limited to paying
the greater of:
(1)
The damaged building portion’s actual cash value
(2)
That proportion of the cost to repair or replace, after application of
deductible and without deduction for depreciation of the part of the building
damaged, based on the ratio between the part of the limit carried on the policy
and the amount equal to 80% of the replacement cost of the building.
c.
The calculation of the 80% of the full replacement cost figure should not
include the value of any of the following:
(1)
Excavations, footings, foundations, piers, or any supports beneath the covered
structure’s lowest basement floor
(2)
If there is no basement then those supports described in c. (1) that are
beneath the ground located within the foundation walls
(3)
Underground flues, pipes, wiring, and drains
d.
The insurance company pays no more than actual cash value until the actual
repair or replacement is complete. Once it is complete, the insurance company
will settle the loss according to the provisions discussed above. If, however,
the cost to repair or replace the damage is less than 5% of the amount of
insurance in this policy on the building and less than $5,000 (Up from $2,500 - 03 22 Change),
the loss will be settled according to the provisions listed above, regardless
of whether actual repair or replacement is complete.
e.
An insured has the option not to worry about replacement cost loss settlement
provisions and ask that his or her loss or damage to buildings be settled on an
actual cash value basis. However, if the “insured” changes their mind, they
have up to 180 days from the date of the loss to ask for any additional amount
due according to a settlement based on the replacement cost. If the insured
misses this 180-day window, the actual cash value settlement basis is their
only reimbursement.
In several instances, there is specific mention that any
payment obligations include a given policy’s applicable deductible. (03 22
Change).
This condition emphasizes
the point that it is very important to accurately document the replacement cost
of the covered property. Property that doesn’t comply with the Comprehensive
form policy’s replacement costs provisions is subject to a tedious and
complicated settlement process.
When property that is part of a pair or set
suffers a covered loss, the insurer can choose to settle on one of the
following bases:
1.
Repair or replace any component that results in returning the pair or set to
its pre-loss value
2.
Pay the amount equal to the pair or set’s pre-loss and post-loss actual cash
value
|
Example: Lorelei planned to sell a
tea set she inherited from her grandmother. She had it on display in her home
during a burglary. The thieves did not steal the set, but during the theft,
they knocked over part of the set and the creamer and a cup were smashed. The
insurer is unable to find replacements for the set. Lorelei is able to sell
the incomplete set and her insurer pays the difference between it and what
research indicated would’ve been the selling price of a complete set. |
Note: This condition DOES NOT say
whether the insurer has the option of paying the least or most expensive of the
two options. However, it would be consistent with other settlement provisions
of the policy that an insurer is likely to select the least expensive option.
If the “insured” and the insurer disagree on
the amount of loss, either party can demand that the loss be appraised. In this
process:
·
each party chooses a competent, impartial
appraiser no later than 20 days after getting the other party’s request for an
appraisal,
·
the two appraisers will choose an umpire
·
each party has to share the cost of the judge
and pay the entire expense for their own appraiser.
If the appraisers cannot agree upon an umpire
within 15 days, either the insurer or the “insured” can ask that a judge be
selected by a court of record in the state where the "residence
premises" is located.
The appraisers have to submit separate
opinions on the loss amount and an agreement (submitted to the insurer in
writing) between any two persons (among the appraisers and the judge) becomes
binding on both the insurer and the policyholder.
469_C406 Despite Coverage Dispute, Appraisal
Is an Obligation
This represents a broader intent than the
traditional other insurance provision since it addresses other sources of
protection.
1.
If a covered loss is also protected by other insurance, the insurer’s payment
obligation is shared with the other coverage source. Specifically, the insurer
becomes obligated to pay only its share of the loss. The share is determined by
taking the total amount of available insurance and determining the insurer’s
percentage of coverage.
2.
If any valid service agreement applies to the covered property, this insurance
is triggered once the amount available under the service agreement is paid.
Service agreement refers to the following:
·
Service plan
·
Property restoration plan
·
Home warranty
·
Other warranties.
This condition applies even if, rather than
being called a warranty or plan, the other source of coverage calls itself
insurance.
Note: This condition only refers to
other coverage but does not specify whether the other source has to be valid
and collectible. Therefore, a dispute could arise depending upon how this condition
is exercised.
|
|
Example: Joey’s home is covered by a comprehensive
form policy. A few months after moving into his home, a fire starts in his
garage. They discover that a malfunctioning pilot on his water tank
overheated and caused the fire. The total fire loss is for $5,900. Joey’s
insurer deducts $700 for the loss since the appliance warranty he purchased
with the home will handle part of the loss. |
This condition states that an insured can’t
sue the insurer without fully complying with the terms and conditions under
Section I of the policy. Further, any suit has to be filed no later than two
years after the loss date. The intent of this provision is to make certain
that an insured takes every course of action that is available and to use a
lawsuit only as a last resort. It should be to everyone’s advantage if
conflicts can be resolved without having to go to court. However, suits happen
and if this alternative is chosen, the insured must file the action within two
years of the loss date.
Related Court Case: Suit Limitation
Rule Was That of State in Which Property Was Located
“Our” refers to the insurance company. This
condition obligates the insurer to either repair or replace the damaged
property within 30 days after receiving the “insured’s” signed, sworn proof of
loss. The insurer also has the option to use material that is similar in type
or quality to repair or replace the damaged property. In other words, the
insurance company is not obligated to pay a loss with cash. The insurance
company can actually replace the damaged property with new or like property.
The insurance company will adjust all losses
with the named insured. The insurance company will pay the named insured unless
some other person is named in the policy or has a legal right to receive
payment. All losses will be payable 60 days after the insurance company
receives the named insured’s proof of loss and after one of the following
occurs:
1.
The insurance company reaches an agreement with the named insured
2.
An entry of final judgment is entered
3.
The insurance company receives filing of an appraisal award.
This condition explains to the insured that
the insurance company is only obligated to deal with persons who have a valid
interest in the loss and not with disinterested third parties such as lawyers
or independent brokers or specialists.
Related Court Case: Buyer's Insurer
Could Not Secure Contribution from Sellers' Insurer for Loss After Closing
The insurance company is not required to
accept any property which is abandoned by the named insured. In other words, an
insurance company is not automatically responsible for taking care of or
disposing damaged property.
|
Example: Penny’s garage freezer’s
wiring went bad and the short circuit burned it out. Penny receives a $300
payment on the four-year-old freezer and the insurer explains that the cost
includes depreciation. Penny requests that her insurer take the freezer and
she is told that she will have to get rid of the freezer on her own. |
1.
When the policy’s declarations page includes a mortgagee, that mortgagee will
be paid along with the named insured for any eligible loss involving property
covered under dwelling coverage (Coverage A) or other structures coverage
(Coverage B). The payment will be made according to the mortgagee’s insurable
interest and, if there is more than one mortgagee, will reflect any order of
precedence.
2.
If the insurance company denies the named insured’s claim, that mortgagee may
preserve its right to a loss payment by taking corrective action as described
below:
a.
The mortgagee notifies the insurer of any change in ownership, occupancy, or
substantial change in risk of which it is aware
b.
The mortgagee pays any premium due if the named insured fails to make the
premium payment
c.
The mortgagee provides the insurer with a signed, sworn statement of loss
within 60 days of being told that this has NOT been done by the named insured.
In other words, when a mortgagee exists, an
insured’s failure to comply with the policy conditions does NOT endanger the
mortgagee’s recovery for a covered loss IF the mortgagee agrees to fulfill the
policy conditions in place of the named insured. Further, if there are disputes
involving a claim, the mortgagee assumes the ability to exercise the rights to
appraisal or legal action against the insurer. However, the mortgagee is also
obligated to the same terms: specifically, to comply with ALL policy provisions
and to be subject to the same two-year time frame for filing a lawsuit.
3.
If the insurer cancels or does not renew the policy, the mortgagee will be
notified at least 10 days before the date cancellation or nonrenewal takes
effect.
IMPORTANT:
While this is the time frame appearing in the policy, the time limit and
notification requirements are determined by laws of the state in which the
policy is issued.
4.
If the insurance company pays the mortgagee for any loss and denies payment to
the named insured, the insurance company receives the mortgagee’s subrogation
rights.
The insurer reserves the option of paying the
mortgagee the entire principal balance on the mortgage along with any accrued
interest. If the principal and interest are paid, the insurer acquires a full
assignment and transfer of the mortgage. The transfer includes all securities
that are held as collateral for the mortgage.
5.
However, any subrogation won’t affect the mortgagee’s full claim.
Related Court Case: “Mortgage Clause
Held to Indemnify Lender Despite Termination of Insurance Interest of Borrower”
Through this policy provision, an insurer
denies any policy benefit to entities (personal or commercial) that charge or
receive a fee for providing any of the following services:
·
holding property
·
storing property
·
moving property
no matter what appears in any other provision
of the Comprehensive form policy.
"Nuclear hazard" refers to the
following:
·
nuclear reaction
·
radiation
·
radioactive contamination
regardless of the incident being controlled
and no matter how the event is caused. Any consequence of a nuclear hazard is
also considered a nuclear hazard.
Losses created or involving a nuclear hazard
are not considered to be a fire, explosion, or smoke loss, even when these
three perils are included within Section I of the Comprehensive form policy.
This policy does not apply under Section I to
loss caused directly or indirectly by nuclear hazard. The one exception is that
direct loss by fire resulting from the nuclear hazard is covered.
The named insured and the insurer are
obligated to tell each other when, after a loss has been paid, property
involved in the claim has been recovered. What happens next is up to the named
insured. The named insured may allow the company to have or keep the property
or the property may be kept by (or returned to) the named insured. If the
property is returned to the named insured, any payment has to be adjusted to
reflect the condition or value of the property. In other words, the named
insured may have to return part or all of any loss payment.
Within a 72-hour period, all volcanic
eruptions that occur will be treated as one eruption.
This item merely states that the coverage
supplied by this policy is only valid for loss that actually occurs during the
applicable policy period.
This provision voids coverage for all persons
otherwise eligible for protection if the insurer discovers any incidents of
significant information being kept from it (either due to concealment or
misrepresentation). Loss of coverage also results if any otherwise covered
persons are guilty of fraudulent behavior or lying (false statement) regarding
any aspect of the applicable insurance coverage.
The provision attempts to be comprehensive,
barring coverage to all parties, including innocent insureds. However, the
provision wording may likely cause confusion over how it applies and appears to
be vulnerable to court scrutiny in the event of claims.
Related Court Case: Application Information About Previous Cancellation Held to Render Policy Void
The purpose of this provision is to change
the way the policy operates when a loss payee appears on the policy
declarations. When a loss payee appears, the loss payee is included in the
definition of “insured” with regards to the covered property. Further, the loss
payee is entitled to written notification if the policy is cancelled or not
renewed.
This coverage obligates an insurance company to
provide coverage for bodily injury or property damage caused by an occurrence.
Of course, what is meant by property damage, bodily injury and occurrence is
defined by the Comprehensive form policy. If the loss does qualify for
coverage, the policy (through the insurer writing the coverage) will:
1.
Pay up to the policy’s insurance limits for the damages for which an
"insured" is legally liable. Eligible damages include prejudgment
interest levied against an "insured."
2.
The Comprehensive form policy also will, at the insurer’s expense, defend an
insured. The defense is provided even when there are no grounds for the lawsuit
or even when the suit was falsely or fraudulently filed. The insurer has the
right to choose the legal representative.
|
|
Example |
Related Court Case: “Insurer
Required to Defend Suit, But Is Held Not Liable”
Along with its obligation to defend and, if
necessary, pay a lawsuit, the insurer has complete power in investigating and
settling claims as it decides is appropriate.
Once the insurance policy’s liability limit
has been used up by either a settlement or a judgment, the insurer has no
further obligation to provide a legal defense to the insured. The defense
obligation ceases when a payment of a judgment or settlement exhausts the
policy’s applicable insurance limit.
The insurance company will pay the necessary
medical expenses that are incurred or medically ascertained (determined) but
only those incurred within three years from the date of an accident that causes
“bodily injury.” Medical expenses include reasonable charges for:
|
medical |
surgical |
x-ray |
|
dental |
ambulance |
hospital |
|
professional nursing |
prosthetic devices |
funeral services |
This coverage part refers to necessary
medical expenses and, in defining medical expenses, refers to reasonable
charges. Therefore, in order for a charge to be paid under Medical Payments to
Others, the charge has to be the result of accidental “bodily injury” covered
by the policy and the charge has to be for a reasonable amount. There is no
coverage for either unnecessary charges, even when they’re reasonable, or for
necessary treatment that is performed for exorbitant fees.
|
Example: Jim
Frailnode is hosting a party in his home when one of his neighbors is
severely scalded by Jim’s wife spilling grease from a fondue pot onto his
legs. The neighbor sends in a laundry list of treatments, including several
chest x-rays and an MRI. The x-rays and MRI charges are the cheapest in the
state. Although these charges are the least expensive available, the expenses
are not eligible for reimbursement because the treatments are not connected
to the burn accident; so, though they’re reasonable, they’re unnecessary. |
The policy’s Medical Payments to Others
coverage applies to third parties, so the named insured, that insured’s
resident family members and other regular household residents don’t qualify for
medical payments. An exception exists for a named insured’s residence
employees. Even those who are considered third parties, coverage exists only
under the following circumstances:
1.
To those that the named insured permits to be on an "insured
location"
2.
To those who are not on an "insured location," who suffer "bodily
injury" resulting from any of the following:
a.
A condition existing on the "insured location" or the ways
immediately adjoining
b.
Circumstances caused by the activities of an “insured”
c.
Circumstances caused by a "residence employee" in the course of the
"residence employee's" employment by an “insured”
d.
Circumstances caused by an animal owned by or in the care of an
"insured."
Here is where one
finds exposures which ARE NOT covered by the homeowner policy’s liability
coverage part. A policy’s exclusion section is typically the most difficult to
comprehend. As more consumers are exposed to the simplified shortcut writing
used on computers and mobile devices, expectations on understanding such common
forms may force future language changes.
The first four
exclusions are self-contained and feature vehicles or crafts.
1.
The Comprehensive form coverage parts Coverage E - Personal Liability and
Coverage F - Medical Payments to Others do not protect an insured against an
“occurrence” related to “motor vehicle liability” when the loss involves:
a.
A motor vehicle which is actually registered to be used on public roads or
property.
b. Vehicles
that are not registered for public road use but that are required by the
governmental authority to be registered. The registration requirement is
determined by the location where the occurrence happens.
c.
Coverage is also excluded when the “motor vehicle” (as defined by the Comprehensive
form policy’s definition section) meets any of the following conditions:
(1)
Used in an organized or prearranged race, speed contest or other competition,
including or preparing for the race
Note:
Since this exclusion refers to prearranged or organized events, it would appear
that a spontaneous event, such as a drag race, might be covered. Of course,
such a race would have to involve vehicles that aren’t excluded by other parts
of the policy.
(2)
Rented to other persons
(3)
A vehicle whose owner charges a fee to carry persons or property
|
|
Example: Celia lives in a neighborhood next to a
large hardware store. Many of her neighbors are, like her, elderly and many no
longer have cars. Celia has a riding mower with a flat trailer she uses to
help with landscaping. She frequently charges neighbors $10 for them to use
the mower and trailer to carry home heavy supplies that they buy from the
hardware store. This use of the mower and trailer would not qualify for
coverage if a loss occurred. |
(4)
A vehicle that is used in a “business,” with the exception of a motorized golf
cart while it is being used on a golfing facility.
2.
If a vehicle fails to fall under exclusion A.1,
a motor vehicle is still not covered EXCEPT when the vehicle meets the one or
more of the following conditions:
a.
Is on an “insured location” and in dead storage
|
Example: Joey likes that his home is
“the gathering place” for his children’s friends. He’s usually happy to see
and hear kids enjoying themselves, at least until recently. His large home
includes a three-car garage. One space is reserved for a classic car
restoration project and the car is on blocks with its battery removed. While
playing hide and seek, a child is seriously hurt when she runs into a corner
of the car and the trunk hood slams down on her arm. Joey’s policy will
respond to this loss. |
b.
ONLY used in connection with maintaining an “insured’s” residence
c. Riding mowers that are used to mow a
lawn when a loss occurs (03 22 Change)
d.
Made for use by handicapped persons and the loss occurs when either of the
following is true:
(1)
The vehicle is assisting a handicapped person
(2)
The vehicle is parked on an “insured location”
(Note that even if a vehicle such as a
motorized wheelchair is involved in a loss, the loss is not eligible for
coverage UNLESS the wheelchair is ASSISTING a handicapped person or is parked.)
e.
A recreational vehicle that is MADE as a recreational vehicle to be used off
public roads AND one or more of the following apply:
(1)
The vehicle is NOT owned by an insured
(2)(a)
The vehicle IS owned by an insured, but the loss occurs on an insured
location. Note that the insured location must qualify as such under the
policy’s definition.
|
Example:
Yeardly is testing out the repairs that she made on her ATV. She is in
her driveway when she starts it and, as she puts it into gear, it suddenly
accelerates. Before she can turn it off, she hits her neighbor, Sheila, who
was just picking up her newspaper. She hit the neighbor in a part of the
driveway that they share. This accident would be covered. |
(2)(b)
The vehicle is owned by an insured, but the loss occurs away from an insured
location. However, this off-location protection is quite narrow. It applies
only when the loss involves a vehicle that is designed to be used by young
children (6 years and younger) as a toy, is battery-powered and is incapable of
moving faster than 5 mph on level ground. In other words, the policy responds
to, essentially, losses resulting from motorized, pre-school toys.
Note: The
5-mph restriction applies whether the motorized toy’s speed capability was
provided by the manufacturer or is due to later modification.
Of course, though the coverage is narrow, it
is still valuable that the Comprehensive form policy could respond to hazards
caused by certain motorized property.
f.
A motorized golf cart which is owned by an insured and which is built for
carrying four or fewer persons and is not capable of traveling faster than 25
mph on level ground. Further, the golf cart MUST be operated within the legal
boundaries of the following:
(1)
A golfing facility at which the golf cart is either kept or is being used by an
insured to do any of the following:
(a)
Play golf or some other activity sanctioned at the facility (interesting, what
if the facility sanctioned golf cart races?)
(b)
Ride between the areas where golf carts or motor vehicles are parked or stored
(c)
Cross public streets in order to get to other areas of the golfing facility
(2)
A private community which, with the consent of the community’s property-owner
association, allows golf carts to travel upon its roads. However, the person
operating the cart must have a residence located within that private community.
|
Example: Babette was visiting a
friend in WornDown Acres, a housing community consisting of retired citizens.
Use of golf carts on its streets is permitted by their property association.
Babette was turning a last corner before her friend’s house. She lost control
while making a turn and she hit a pedestrian. Her HO policy will not cover
the accident. Babette lives next door to WornDown Acres but is not a resident
of the community. |
The Comprehensive form policy is designed to tightly
control the exposure to any imaginable liability related to motor vehicles.
However, even with the latest wording, it is
not always clear that a vehicle's involvement with a loss will result in it
being ineligible for HO coverage.
Related Court Case: "Motor
Vehicle Exclusion Did Not Apply to Injury by Forced Removal from Parked
Vehicle"
1.
The Comprehensive form coverage parts Coverage E - Personal Liability and
Coverage F - Medical Payments to Others do not protect an insured against an
“occurrence” related to “watercraft liability” when the loss involves
watercraft that meets any of the following criteria:
a.
Used in an organized or prearranged race, speed contest or other competition,
including practicing or preparing for the race
Note: Since this exclusion refers to
prearranged or organized events, it would appear that a spontaneous race might
be covered. Regardless, there is a racing exception. The exclusion does not
apply to races involving sailing vessels or predicted log cruises (where
specified locations or spots are predetermined and the single or multiple
participants compete to see how quickly they can arrive at each destination).
b.
Rented to other persons
c.
Available to carry persons or property if a fee is paid to its owner
d.
Used in a “business.”
|
Example: Lester lives in a small town
that’s a popular tourist attraction due to its lake. It’s a great place for
fishing! Lester’s a fishing veteran and he knows how to choose excellent
fishing spots. There are many small lodges around the lake. Lester uses his
outboard boat to travel all along the lake, making note of good of places
where fish activity is high. He writes up a brief newsletter called “Lester’s
Hot Fishin’” which he delivers to the lodges that are paid subscribers.
Lester’s outboard, which is listed on his HO policy, is not eligible for
coverage because of this use. |
2.
If a situation involving watercraft fails to fall under exclusion B.1., a
watercraft liability loss is still not covered EXCEPT when the watercraft meets
any of the following criteria:
a.
Stored
b.
A sailing vessel. The exception is not affected by the vessel having auxiliary
power, but the sailboat must be one of the following:
(1)
shorter than 26 feet
(2)
Longer than 26 feet as long as it is not owned by an insured.
Item
2.b.2. no longer includes referenced to rented watercraft (03 22 Change)
In other words, a loss involving a short
sailing boat could be covered.
c. Not
a sailing vessel. However, if powered (regardless the type, engine, or motor),
no matter their number, if total amount of power:
(1) (a)
has 25 or less horsepower. There is no ownership requirement.
(2) Is
more powerful than 25 hp and falls under the following
(a) is not a craft that the insured owns
(b) while
it is owned by an insured, ownership of the engine/motor is securing during the
policy period, or
(c) an
insured gets the engine/motor before the policy period, however eligibility is
gained by
but
only if:
(i)
the
insured advised of having possession of the engine or motor at the beginning of
the policy’s inception and
(ii)
the insured insures them within 45 days of purchasing the motor or engine.
Coverage
applicable according to Item (b) exists throughout the entire policy period.
Item
2.c. was made significantly shorter in order to make it simpler and clearer.
(03 22 Change).
Note:
When horsepower appears in the policy, it means the maximum power rating which
the manufacturer has assigned to the engine or motor.
Related Court Case: “HP Rating of Personal Watercraft Held to Relate to Motor Rather Than
Jet Pump”
Unlike the motor vehicle and watercraft
exclusions, there are no exceptions. The size, wingspan, aircraft type does not
matter. Losses related to aircraft are not covered by the Comprehensive form
Policy.
Related Article: Aviation Insurance
Related Court Case: Aircraft
Definition Held Not to Include a Parachute
It will be interesting to see how policy
language and coverage may be affected by increasing use of drones.
This exclusion is a twin of the exclusion for
aircraft liability. The Comprehensive form policy, without exception, does not
provide an insured protection from their liability related to hovercraft. Hovercraft
liability is a term that is found in the Comprehensive form policy’s definition
section. While the decision to specifically exclude hovercraft clarifies the
coverage philosophy of the policy (as opposed to assuming that such property
may be excluded as a type of either air or watercraft), there is now the
possibility that coverage may exist for unusual craft or vehicles that are not
included in any current category. Of course, keeping things in perspective, the
exposure to such craft or vehicle is likely to be rare.
1.
Expected or Intended Injury
There is no coverage for any injury an
“insured” expects or intends.
Intentional acts are excluded EVEN if the
property damage or bodily injury is different in the kind or degree than what
an insured hoped or expected would occur; or it is suffered by a different
party or property than what an insured either expected or hoped.
|
Example: Peter’s 18-year-old son,
Jasper, decides to play a prank on Tommy, his best friend. Jasper sneaks over
and places a large pile of firecrackers underneath the window outside Tommy’s
bedroom. Jasper lights the pile and runs off. The fireworks are so powerful
that they seriously burn the siding on Tommy’s home and break the window. The
explosion also violently startles Tommy who falls out of his bed and onto his
pet pit bull who had been sleeping next to the bed. The dog, already
frightened by the firecrackers, attacks his owner when he lands on top of
him. When Peter contacts you about the bills he received for property repairs
and medical treatments, you’ll have to share the bad news that they all were
due to an intentional act and aren’t eligible for coverage. |
There is an important exception to this
exclusion. When bodily injury or property damage results from an insured acting
to protect persons or property, the loss is covered IF it only involved use of
reasonable force.
Related Court Case: “Intended Act
Determined Not Covered Even If Results Were Different Than Expected or Intended”
2.
Business
a.
There is no coverage for injury related to “business" activity that takes
place at an insured location or in which an “insured” is engaged. This exclusion
applies even if the business is neither owned by nor employs an insured.
Further, the bar to coverage even extends to an insured’s omissions. An
omission is WITHOUT consideration of whether it is related to the nature or
duties of the insured’s business or service.
There are a couple of exceptions to the
business exclusion.
b.
The exclusion is not applied to:
(1) an insured
location that is either rented or available for rental:
(a) only on occasion IF it the rental is for use as a
residence,
(b) a partial rental of an insured location. In other
words, even steady rental is covered if it only involves a portion of the
insured location. HOWEVER, this exception is lost if it involves a single
family unit that is occupied by an insured who rents part of it out to more
than two roomer/boarders.
(c) a partial rental of an insured location if the
purpose of the rental is for a school, studio, office or private garage.
2. b.
(1) States that the exclusion does not take situations that qualify as
home-sharing host activities into consideration. (03 22 Change).
(2) Another exception exists for insureds who are age 20
or younger and are involved in a part-time or occasional business which he or
she owns. However, their business cannot have any employees.
Note: The
exception makes no mention of partners.
Related Court
Case: Business Pursuits Exclusion Debated
3. Professional Services
There’s no
coverage for property damage or bodily injury related to an insured performing
or failing to perform a professional service (medicine, law, accounting,
financial consulting, etc.)
4. Insured’s Premises not An Insured Location
There is also
no coverage for liability stemming from a premises THAT IS NOT an insured
location to which any of the following apply:
a. Is owned
by an insured
b. Another
party rents to an insured
c. An
insured rents to other persons
5. War
No
coverage exists for a loss that is due either directly or indirectly by war and
any consequences of the following:
a.
War that has not been formally declared, civil conflicts, insurrection,
rebellion, or revolution
b.
Activity similar to war that involves military forces or personnel
c.
Related to destruction, confiscation or use for any military purpose.
Please note that even the accidental discharge of a nuclear bomb
is defined as a warlike act.
6.
Communicable Disease
No coverage is available for any liability
due to someone being injured after catching an infectious disease from an
insured. Communicable disease includes those which are transmitted via sexual
relations but is not limited to it.
7. Sexual
Molestation, Corporal Punishment or Physical or Mental Abuse
There is no coverage and there are no
exceptions.
|
Example: Hallie Slapshot was quite
upset to hear from her insurer that her claim wasn’t eligible for coverage
under her Comprehensive form policy. Hallie, a teacher, was at her wit’s end for
one Friday class. Her fifth-grade class was wild the entire day with kids
continually talking and bickering. Hallie decided to tell her children to sit
and be quiet for the last half hour of the school day. When Paul Prestglass
knocked several books onto the floor, Hallie whipped over to his desk, picked
Paul up and whacked him solidly on his bottom. Hallie was ashamed of herself
immediately, but Paul’s parents weren’t interested in her “feeling bad.” The
Prestglasses filed suit, asking for $30,000. Although Hallie’s policy has
liability limits of $300,000, corporal punishment is excluded from coverage. |
Related Court Case: Policy’s Sexual
Molestation Exclusion Upheld
8.
Controlled Substance
a. Protection is unavailable for any loss
developing from the use, sale, manufacture, delivery, transfer, or possession
by any person of a Controlled Substance(s) as defined by the Federal Food and
Drug Law at 21 U.S.C.A. Sections 811 and 812.
Controlled Substances include, but are not
limited to:
·
Cocaine
·
LSD
·
All narcotic drugs
b. Protection is unavailable for any loss
developing from the use, sale, manufacture, delivery, transfer, or possession
by any person of cannabis. This exclusion is not affected when cannabis is not
deemed to be a Controlled Substance. (03 22 Change).
This exclusion’s scope is along the same
lines as the exclusions for motor vehicle liability. In other words, coverage
would be excluded for any loss having any connection with controlled
substances.
This exclusion makes an exception for any loss involving the
legitimate use of prescription drugs by a person following the orders of a
licensed health care professional.
Related Court Case: Damages Sought in
Death from Illegal Drug
This exclusion makes an exception for any
loss involving the legitimate use of prescription drugs by a person following
the orders of a licensed health care professional.
Note:
Medical marijuana use has not been tested. It is a specifically listed
controlled substance and continues to be illegal under the Federal Food and
Drug Law yet it can be prescribed in a number of states.
It is important to be aware that the
following exclusions DO NOT apply to a bodily injury loss to a residence
employee when the loss either occurs during or develops out of the employee
performing his or her job:
·
A. “Motor
Vehicle” Liability
·
B. Watercraft
Liability
·
C. Aircraft
Liability
·
D. Hovercraft
Liability
·
E. 4.
Liability stemming from an insured’s premises which are not defined as an
insured location
1.
Liability:
a.
Caused by any assessment charged against an insured by any association, corporation,
or community of property owners. However, this exclusion can be ignored for any
coverage which applies under Additional
Coverage 4. Loss Assessment.
|
Example: Phil just got a request from
his homeowner association to pay $859 to the Pristine Community Fund. The
association is collecting the money to clean up the association’s community
house. Phil pays the assessment and then sends in a claim to his insurer.
Fire & Calamity, Inc.’s adjuster phones Phil and tells him that the
assessment doesn’t qualify for coverage. |
b.
Created by any contract or agreement made by or involving an insured. This
exclusion does not apply if the agreements or contracts are in writing and
either of the following applies:
(1) They are directly related to the
ownership, maintenance, or use of an "insured location"
(2) An insured takes over some other
person’s liability before an "occurrence" unless the loss is excluded
somewhere else in the Comprehensive form policy.
Note: This exception doesn’t do
anything beyond restoring coverage for liability losses which could have been
lost by being mentioned under a written contract. In other words, the liability
coverage under the Comprehensive form policy is meant to cover losses connected
to the covered property. The fact that such a liability is part of some
contract arranged with an insured won’t affect that eligible coverage.
2. Property Damage to
property owned by an insured.
The Comprehensive form policy prohibits recovery for an insured’s
costs/expenses related to the need to repair, replace, enhance, restore, or
maintain such property to prevent injury to a person or damage to other
persons’ property, anywhere. In other words, there’s no set of circumstances
for property damage liability coverage to be extended to an insured’s own property.
However, damage suffered by a property belonging to an insured is often covered
by the Comprehensive form policy’s Coverage Part C - Personal Property.
3. Property damage to property which is rented to, occupied, or used by
or in the care of an insured. This exclusion does not apply when property
damage is caused by fire, smoke, or explosion.
|
Example: The |
|
4. Bodily injury to any person eligible to receive any benefits that are
provided on a volunteer basis or required to be provided by any “insured”
under any workers compensation law, non-occupational disability law, or
occupational disease law. Again, this is a precaution against obligating the Comprehensive
form policy to grant coverage that should be, rightfully, provided by another.
5. Bodily injury or
property damage for which an insured under this policy also is insured
under a nuclear energy liability policy or would be an insured under a policy
except that the limits have already been exhausted.
A nuclear energy liability policy is one
issued by any one of the following companies:
·
Nuclear Energy Liability Insurance Association
(formerly American Nuclear Insurers)
·
Mutual Atomic Energy Liability Underwriters
·
Nuclear Insurance Association of
or any one of the successors to these
companies.
Note:
Both exclusions 4 and 5 are to prevent the Comprehensive form policy from
offering coverage that should be provided by other, specialized insurance
policies.
6.
Bodily injury to you or an insured within the meaning of the Comprehensive
form policy’s definition of insured.
The Comprehensive form policy’s liability
section is designed to cover an insured against his or her legal liability to
others (or third parties), not for providing first party (an insured)
protection.
G.
Coverage F - Medical Payments to Others
These
exclusions apply only to Coverage F. This coverage does not apply to bodily
injury:
1. To
a "residence employee" but only if both of the following apply:
a.
The bodily injury must occur away from the “insured location”
b.
The bodily injury is not related to the fact that the “residence employee” is
working for the “insured.”
In other words, coverage is only provided in
situations that represent the liability most closely related to the covered
residence. If the loss has either a remote or no relation to the covered
property, the loss is excluded from protection under the Comprehensive form
policy.
2. To
any person who is a beneficiary of protection that is either voluntarily
provided or that is provided under mandate of any of the following:
a.
Workers compensation law
b.
non-occupational disability law
c.
Occupational disease law.
|
Example: Johnny, a local handyman,
was hired by Amy to rebuild a dilapidated shed that was in her backyard.
Johnny slips while climbing a ladder to work on the shed’s roof. He falls
down on top of a pile of tools and lumber, severely injuring his back and
head. The state where they both live demands that Amy buys insurance to
protect such workers. While the loss technically qualifies for coverage under
the Comprehensive form policy, the state-mandated coverage would take the
place of the homeowners policy in responding to Johnny’s injuries. |
3. If
bodily injury occurs from any of the following:
·
Nuclear reaction
·
Nuclear radiation
·
Radioactive contamination
This exclusion applies regardless of how any
of the above was caused or whether it is controlled or uncontrolled. No
coverage is provided from any loss that is a consequence of nuclear reaction,
nuclear radiation, or radioactive contamination.
4. To these parties:
a. any person living/residing in the
covered location who qualifies as a home-sharing occupant.
b. any persons who are ongoing occupants on
any part of the "insured location."
(03 22 Change) The only exception is a
residence employee.
Under its liability portion of coverage, the Comprehensive
form policy provides four coverages which are in addition to the insurance
limits that appear on the declarations page. Specifically, the Comprehensive
form policy also provides coverage for:
·
Claims Expenses
·
First Aid Expenses
·
Damage to Property of Others
·
Loss Assessment
The policy pays:
1.
For costs and expenses tallied up during an insurance company’s efforts to
defend an insured during a lawsuit.
2.
Expenses eligible for coverage include amounts assigned to an insured for a
claim that the insurer is defending on the behalf of an insured. If any
premiums or bonds are required while defending against a lawsuit, these
premiums will be paid by the insurer. However, the company’s obligation to pay
for this expense ends once the amount paid exhausts the Coverage E insurance
limit. Also, the insurer HAS NO OBLIGATION to either apply for or to furnish any
bond.
3.
This additional coverage also pays for an insured’s reasonable expenses that
are created by cooperating with the insurer. This includes the actual loss of
earnings up to $250 per day for assisting the insurance company in the investigation
or defense of a claim or a suit.
4.
Finally, when an entry of judgment takes place, the insurer is obligated to
handle interest that accrues between the time of judgment and when the
insurance company pays its portion of the judgment. It is important to note
that the interest the insurance company must pay is not limited to only its
portion of the judgment. However, its responsibility for the interest ends when
it has paid its portion of the judgment. The insured and/or other parties would
be responsible for accruing interest on the remaining amount of the judgment if
they do not pay before or at the same time the insurance company pays.
If the insured incurs expenses in providing first
aid to others because of “bodily injury" covered under this policy, the
insurance company will reimburse the insured. However, the insurance company
will not pay for first aid to an insured.
|
|
Example: Ike and Mason are playing
basketball at Ike’s home. They are lifelong friends and were also star
basketball players for their town’s rival high schools and both are intensely
competitive. During the last of a particularly hard-fought best-of-three
matchup, Mason drives for a potentially game-winning lay-up. Ike charges hard
for a block. They slam into each other and their momentum carries them into
the basketball goal’s rigid steel pole and onto the cement driveway. Their
wives take them to a hospital to take care of broken limbs and lost teeth.
Ike’s HO policy will handle Mason’s treatment costs, but not his own. |
1.
The Comprehensive form policy pays to cover property belonging to other persons
which is damaged (accidentally) by an insured. The coverage is on a replacement
cost basis. The maximum per occurrence limit is $5,000 (up from $1,000 in
the previous HO edition). (03 22 Change). This coverage is an example of
risk management since the amount is available to quickly handle minor losses
before they can escalate into expensive lawsuits.
2.
However, the insurer will NOT pay for any of the following types of property
damage:
·
That can be fully recovered under Section I of
the policy
·
From an act that is intentionally caused by an
"insured" who is 13 years of age or older
·
If the property is owned by an "insured”
·
If the property is owned by or rented to either an
insured’s tenant or a resident in the named insured’s household
·
That arises out of a “business” pursuit of an
"insured"
·
That arises from any act or omission in
connection with a premises owned, rented, or controlled by an "insured,” that
is not the "insured location”
·
That arises from the ownership, maintenance, or
use of aircraft, watercraft or motor vehicles, or all other motorized land
conveyances
This
exclusion does not apply if the motor vehicle is designed for recreational use
off public roads, is not subject to motor vehicle registration and is not owned
by an "insured.”
1.
The policy will pay up to $2,000 (up from $1,000 in the previous HO edition).
(03 22 Change) in assessments charged to an insured during the policy
period. The assessment has to be made by a corporation or association of
property owners and the assessment has to involve "bodily injury" or
"property damage" that is eligible for coverage under Section II
(liability) of the policy. Further, the coverage applies only to loss
assessments charged against the named insured as owner or tenant of the
"residence premises."
This additional coverage will also pay for
the liability for an act of a director, officer or trustee who causes a loss
while performing their respective duties for the property owner, corporation,
or association. Such persons must have been elected by the member property
owners and their work must be compensation-free.
2. The policy’s Policy
Period condition does not apply to Loss Assessment coverage.
3.
Regardless of the number of assessments, the limit of $2,000 (again, 03 22
change) is the most the insurer is obligated to pay for a loss stemming
from either of the following:
·
One accident, including continuous or repeated
exposure to substantially the same general harmful condition
·
A covered act of a director, officer, or
trustee.
If more than one director, officer or trustee is involved in a
covered act, it is considered to be a single act.
4. The policy will not cover loss
assessments charged against an insured or a corporation or association of
property owners by any governmental body.
The Comprehensive form policy makes a maximum
dollar amount available for any single, eligible loss. The total amount paid
under Coverage E for all damages related to a single loss will not be more than
the Coverage E insurance limit entered on the declarations. The stated limit IS
NOT affected by the number of:
·
Insureds
·
Claims made
·
Persons injured.
All "bodily injury" and
"property damage" that is created by any one accident or from
continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general harmful
conditions that are considered to be the result of a single "occurrence."
The total liability under Coverage F for all
medical expense payable for "bodily injury" to one person as the
result of one accident is no more than the limit of liability for Coverage F. listed
on the declarations.
This insurance applies separately to each
"insured." This condition will not increase the limit of liability
for any single "occurrence."
If different insureds are involved with
distinct losses that are covered by the policy, then the entire insurance limit
is applied to each insured. In other words, the named insured may be sued for
two different events during a single policy period and the total Coverage E
insurance limit will be applied, in full, to each occurrence. Theoretically,
all of the insureds identified under a single policy could suffer losses for
different reasons on the same day and the policy’s full insurance limit would
apply separately to each person and for each occurrence. However, the Comprehensive
form policy does try to limit its exposure to loss by defining all claims or
expenses connected to a covered occurrence as a single loss and by construing
all losses that result from a continuous and substantially same set of harmful
conditions as a single loss.
|
Example: The Connors throw a huge birthday
party for their daughter and it includes a MoonJumper inflatable tent. The
tent is the hit of the party. However, it is quite old and, at the time that
more than a dozen kids are using it, it violently bursts. Half of the
children receive serious injuries requiring emergency room treatment and
surgeries. The families of each child separately sue Kim and Perry Connors.
The number of injured children and the separate suits do not affect the
$500,000 liability limit appearing on the Connors’ HO policy. That amount is
the maximum available for the single loss. |
In case of an "occurrence," an
"insured" is obligated to perform several duties. The policy includes
a specific statement that, if failure to comply with the policy conditions
harms the insurer’s ability to handle the loss, the insurer may not be
obligated to pay for the loss or defend an insured. The policy uses the phrase,
“prejudicial to the insurer,” which does leave room for debate over how an
insured may lose their insurance protection. But the added wording is helpful
to both the insurer and the insured. It gives greater emphasis to the
importance of complying with the policy’s conditions and it gives the insurer a
way to protect itself from an uncooperative insured.
Under this condition, the insured is
obligated to:
1.
Give written notice to the insurance company or the agent. It must be provided as
soon as is practical. This information should include:
a.
The policy number or other method to identify it plus the named insured on the
declarations
b.
The time, place, and circumstances of the "occurrence." Only that
which is reasonably available is required.
c.
The claimants’ and witnesses’ names and addresses.
2.
Cooperate with the insurer as it investigates, settles, or defends a
claim/suit.
This specific requirement has the goal of properly
emphasizing an insured’s role in assisting the insurer with the claims process.
3.
Send every notice, demand, summons, or other process relating to the accident
or "occurrence” to the insurance company. This must be done in a prompt
manner which is different from “as soon as practical.”
4.
Only when requested by the insurance company, the “insured” must help in any of
the following ways:
a.
To make settlement
b.
To enforce rights of contribution or indemnity which may exist against persons
or organizations who may be liable to an “insured.”
c.
Attend hearings, trials and other activities related to conducting a lawsuit
d.
In securing and giving evidence and also in obtaining witnesses to attend.
5.
If the claim is presented under Damage to Property of Others, then a claim must
be submitted to the insurance company within 60 days after the loss and a sworn
statement of loss must be made along with the damaged property. The damaged property
must only be provided if it is in an “insured's" control.
6.
Voluntarily payments, assumptions of obligations and other expenses can be made
or incurred by insureds but only at their own expense. The only expenses the
insurance company will reimburse are those for first aid to others at the time
of the "bodily injury."
This last duty appears to be inconsistent
with the policy’s earlier warning against an insured doing things that may
prejudice the insurer’s rights or ability to handle a claim. One way to
interpret this duty is to assume that as long as an insured is willing to make
a payment out of his or her own pockets, then doing so is approved by the
insurer. Since payments (outside of first aid treatment) can be viewed as an
admission of liability, it does not seem appropriate to allow customers to make
out of pocket payments….at least not without a separate warning that, by doing
so, they may sacrifice their insurance coverage.
1.
Any injured person or someone acting for the injured person who is claiming
medical payments must do both of the following:
·
Provide a written proof of claim to the
insurance company. It must be provided as soon as practical and an oath may be
required.
·
Provide authorization to the insurance company so
that they can obtain copies of medical reports and records.
2.
It is not enough that the injured party provide information from a doctor. They
must be willing to submit to a physical exam by a doctor the insurance
company’s chooses and the person must do so as often as the insurance company
requires. However, the number of exams must be considered reasonable. Note that
there is no definition of “reasonable.” Items like this are often a point of
contention between injured persons and insurers. While four separate exams may
be reasonable to a company claims adjuster, an injured person might question
why he would need to be examined more than one or two times.
The policy explicitly states that receiving a
payment under this coverage DOES NOT mean an insured considers himself guilty
for causing a loss, nor is it an indication that the insurer thinks that they
are obligated to pay an injured party.
Under this condition:
1.
Action can be brought against the insurance company but not until there has
been full compliance with all of the terms under this section of the Comprehensive
form policy. Note that this condition refers to an insured’s need to FULLY
comply with ALL POLICY TERMS before he or she can file a suit.
2.
The second part of this condition mentions that another party can’t play
“piggyback” by assuming a right to join the insurance company as a party to any
action against an "insured."
3.
Action with respect to personal liability can not be brought against the
insurance company until the actual obligation of the "insured" has
been determined by either a final judgment or under an agreement signed by the
insurance company.
The insurance company is not relieved of any
obligation when an insured declares bankruptcy or is considered insolvent.
Of course, it would be interesting to
challenge this condition. For instance, if an insured misses a premium payment
and the policy terminates for nonpayment, but the nonpayment was due to an
insured being bankrupt and a loss occurs…. well, it would be interesting to
test this condition.
Under this provision, the applicable insurer
places itself behind any other available coverage, acting as an excess source.
There is an important exception. If the other source of coverage is written
specifically as excess liability protection; then this policy responds first
(primary coverage).
Related Court Case: Association Group Policy Held Not to Contribute with Member's Homeowners Policy
Coverage under the
policy’s liability section is only valid for BI or PD that takes place during
the policy period.
Whether it occurs before or after a loss, the
policy will not protect an insured who, with regard to the insurance provided
by the policy does any of the following:
·
Conceals or misrepresents any material fact or
circumstance and does so intentionally
·
Engages in conduct that is considered fraudulent
·
Makes false statements.
If the insurance company makes a change which
broadens coverage under this edition of the policy and there is no additional
premium charge for that change it automatically applies to this policy as of
the date the change is implemented in the state in which the policy is issued.
However, this applies only if the implementation date falls within 60 days
prior to the policy inception date or during the policy period stated in the
declarations.
It is very important to note that this clause
does not apply to changes introduced in a general program revision which
includes both broadening and restricting features. A general program revision
can be implemented through either a subsequent policy edition OR though an
amendatory endorsement.
An insurer has to give an insured written
permission or approval in order to make any valid waivers or changes in the
policy. However, an insurer’s request for either an appraisal or examination
will not waive any of an insurer’s rights.
1.
The named insured has the right to cancel the policy at any time and for any
reason. The only requirement is that the policy be returned or that a written
notice be given to the insurance company. The named insured must specify that
date upon which the cancellation is to be effective.
2.
The insurance company is more restricted in how it may cancel the policy. A
written notice must either be given to the named insured or mailed to the
mailing address on the declarations. The reason for the cancellation must be
stated and those reasons and when they can be used are explained below.
Proof of mailing will be sufficient proof of
notice.
a. Non-payment
of premium - When premium has not been paid, the insurance company may cancel
at any time by providing no less than 10 days notice before the date
cancellation takes effect.
b.
Under 60 days of coverage - When this is the first policy issued by this
insurance company for this named insured and it been in effect for less than 60
days, the insurance company may cancel for any reason by providing no less than
10 days notice before the date cancellation takes effect.
c.
When this policy has been in effect for 60 days or more or if the policy is a
renewal of a policy previously issued by this insurance company there are
significant restrictions in cancellation. The insurance company may cancel only
if one of the following occurs:
·
there has been a material misrepresentation of
fact. This fact must be such that, had it been known, the policy would not have
been issued.
·
a substantial change in the risk occurred after the
policy was issued.
If either of these occurs, the insurance
company must provide no less than 30 days notice before the date cancellation
takes effect.
d.
Multi-year policies - When this policy is written for a period of more than one
year, the insurance company has the right to cancel it for any reason on its anniversary
date. The insurance company must provide no less than 30 days notice before the
date cancellation takes effect.
3.
The premium for the unused days of insurance must be refunded when the policy
is cancelled. The refund must be calculated on a pro rata basis.
4.
The return premium can be provided with the notice of cancellation or at a
later date provided the time frame is reasonable.
The insurance company has the right to not
renew this policy. If they do, they must either delivery a non-renewal notice
to the named insured or mail such a notice to the mailing address on the
declarations. The notice must provide no less than 30 days before the
expiration date of this policy. Only proof of mailing is required as a proof of
notice.
Note
on the Cancellation and Nonrenewal Conditions: State laws control most
aspects of how, when and if a policy can be cancelled or nonrenewed. Individual
companies should be thoroughly familiar with the law of each state in which it
uses the Comprehensive form policy, since these laws may stipulate what is
required for:
·
Nonrenewal or cancellation reasons
·
Parties who must receive advanced notice of
either cancellation or nonrenewal
·
An insured’s recourse concerning a cancellation
or nonrenewal
·
How such notices must be mailed
·
Whether a notice must indicate the reason for
either a cancellation or nonrenewal
·
How much advanced notice is required for
cancellations or nonrenewals
·
The timing of such notices, etc.
This policy provision merely states that a
policy assignment cannot take effect unless and until the insurer gives its
approval in writing.
|
Example: The Greebles have been the
contract purchasers of a home owned by Josh Hardline for 15 years. The
homeowners policy was written in Josh’s name. The Greebles finally made their
last loan payment. As soon as Josh received the check, he sent a short letter
to Fairkumpany Mutual. The letter had Josh’s signature and requested that the
insurance coverage be assigned to the Greebles. Fairkumpany sends the
Greebles a statement showing their acceptance of the assignment. With
Fairkumpany’s written approval in hand, Josh Hardline’s assignment of the
policy to the Greebles becomes effective and the Greebles now own all of the
policy rights. |
While a company may validate a policy
assignment, such arrangements are rare. Typically, once the insurable interest
in a home has changed, it is preferable to terminate the old policy and rewrite
coverage in the name of the current insurable interest.
This part of the policy still gives an
"insured" the choice to waive all of his or her rights to recover
against any person who is legally responsible for a loss that is paid under
this policy. Such a waiver may also be allowed to any given organization.
(03 22 Change). The waiver must be in writing and must have been performed
before any applicable loss. If these rights are not waived, the insurer may
require the insured to assign the rights so the insurer can attempt to recover
payment from another party that is responsible for the loss. The rights are
only good for the maximum amount that the insurer paid to handle the loss.
When an insured assigns its rights to the
insurer, the "insured" must sign and deliver all related papers and
cooperate with the insurance company. Why? Well, having the insured’s right to
recover payment against another party does an insurer no good if the insured
does not help it to make its case. For instance, if a relative or friend of the
insured was responsible for the loss, having the insured’s right to subrogate
against the friend or relation is useless if the insured doesn’t want to make
their friend or relative pay the insurer.
Subrogation does not apply under Section II
to medical payments to others or damage to property of others.
If the named insured dies the insurance
company will insure the legal representative of the deceased. This insurance is
limited to only the premises and property of the deceased covered under the
policy at the time of death. This also applies to the death of the spouse of the
named insured provided that spouse is a resident of the same household as the
named insured.
If the named insured
and/or spouse dies, the insured household’s circumstances could alter radically
so in this section the term insured is changed. Whoever was a member of the
named insured’s household at the time of the death is an insured but only while
a resident of the residence premises. Also, whoever has temporary custody of
the named insured’s property is an insured but only until the appointment and
qualification of a legal representative.