Depreciation Not a Deduction in Loss of Income
Calculation
|
Commercial Lines – Property |
Continuing Expenses |
|
Time Element |
Depreciation Excluded from Recovery |
When an insured's
building was destroyed by fire, a dispute arose over the business interruption
insurance claim. The building was used for commercial rental. The issue was
whether the insurer's adjuster properly deducted approximately $15,000 for
depreciation from the gross rents that were lost due to the building's
destruction. The item was listed along with non-continuing expenses such as
water, power, cleaning, and similar costs.
A trial court determined that depreciation was a continuing
expense and should not be deducted from recovery under the policy. The decision
was reversed on appeal and was then appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court.
Loss of income coverage, in pertinent part, applied to:
"....the reduction in rents, less charges and expenses which do not
necessarily continue during the period of untenantability."
The insured argued that depreciation functioned as a tax
credit rather than a direct expense, since it does not involve actual funds
that lowered the rents received. Conversely, the insurer argued that
depreciation is an expense or charge that may not persist throughout the loss
period. As such, it should be deducted from the total prevented gross rents,
alongside other non-recurring expenses, when determining the settlement.
The high court stated: "The insured property was
destroyed, such that depreciation could no longer be subtracted from the value
of the building." It agreed with the insured that, under the loss of rents
provision in the contract, depreciation is purely a tax measure and not a
non-continuing charge or expense. Therefore, depreciation could not be deducted
from the gross rents that were prevented.
The appellate court was reversed, and the circuit (trial)
court affirmed in favor of the insured and against the insurer.
Grevas, Appellant v. US Fidelity And
Guaranty Co., Appellee. Illinois Supreme Court. Docket No. 73127. October 15,
1992. CCH 1993 Fire and Casualty Cases, Paragraph 3986.